By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Edit: if there's any truth at all in this, does the west have to attack those tanks? Edit 2: ie stop those forces before they do any more damage? Sorry if this a stupid comment. It's late. I'm off to bed.
[Post edited 4 Mar 2022 0:41]
Has anyone ever looked at their own postings for last day or so? Oh my... so sorry. Was Ullaa
They've been shelling a nuclear plant? on 11:28 - Mar 4 by DinDjarin
Not minimising at all I just try to find out the truth as Ukraine are desperate for NATO to get involved as are the media.
A firefight at a powerplant is not good and I never said it was but the hysteria is that Europe is about to be destroyed from a blown up powerplant is not even close to the truth.
Quite right
In the spirit of reconciliation and happiness at the end of the Banter Era (RIP) and as a result of promotion I have cleared out my ignore list. Look forwards to reading your posts!
They've been shelling a nuclear plant? on 11:28 - Mar 4 by DinDjarin
Not minimising at all I just try to find out the truth as Ukraine are desperate for NATO to get involved as are the media.
A firefight at a powerplant is not good and I never said it was but the hysteria is that Europe is about to be destroyed from a blown up powerplant is not even close to the truth.
I still can;t find anyone else saying that the plant wasn't shelled. Only some guy from the UN atomic mob saying that it was shelled and that this is extremely concerning. Apparently one of the reactor blocks was hit by a shell.
Who knows, you could yet turn out to be correct, but i think we need more than one video showing what you term a flair.
Has anyone ever looked at their own postings for last day or so? Oh my... so sorry. Was Ullaa
They've been shelling a nuclear plant? on 16:47 - Mar 4 by GavTWTD
The incident is being discussed at the UN Security Council.
Whilst I would usually support the BBC to the hilt ....and the Putin apologists on here boil my p!ss.......the BBC sub header on this topic currently reads:
"UN Security Council meets after Russian Nuclear attack on Ukraine".
Which I am not sure is sensible.
3
They've been shelling a nuclear plant? on 16:57 - Mar 4 with 526 views
They've been shelling a nuclear plant? on 13:50 - Mar 4 by reusersfreekicks
Pretty clear the plant was shelled
Can you post the footage please?
Edit....and if we are discussing war crimes, does anybody know how many coalition forces and/or politicians have been charged over Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya?
[Post edited 4 Mar 2022 17:06]
"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
They've been shelling a nuclear plant? on 16:54 - Mar 4 by WD19
Whilst I would usually support the BBC to the hilt ....and the Putin apologists on here boil my p!ss.......the BBC sub header on this topic currently reads:
"UN Security Council meets after Russian Nuclear attack on Ukraine".
They've been shelling a nuclear plant? on 16:54 - Mar 4 by WD19
Whilst I would usually support the BBC to the hilt ....and the Putin apologists on here boil my p!ss.......the BBC sub header on this topic currently reads:
"UN Security Council meets after Russian Nuclear attack on Ukraine".
Which I am not sure is sensible.
That’s exactly the problem. People put the words together to mean something completely different.
The Russians shouldn’t be there in the Ukraine. And certainly not attacking the plant workers and defenders. But the suggestion that they’re trying to destroy the reactors or create another Chernobyl if that was even possible doesn’t help anyone.
The BBC subheader just takes that and somehow goes even further with it.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
