Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? 08:18 - Sep 16 with 7508 views | bluelagos | |  |
| |  |
Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? on 09:01 - Sep 17 with 407 views | Oldsmoker |
Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? on 16:40 - Sep 16 by Ryorry | Translation of "new" in this context - "at least two other usernames before this one". |
We could start a sweepstake to guess their identity. I'll take Paz. |  |
|  |
Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? on 09:12 - Sep 17 with 361 views | Radlett_blue |
Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? on 10:30 - Sep 16 by StokieBlue | I'm not convinced by that, with this civil case along with Epstein and Maxwell trials I think most of the details are out there, certainly enough for people to join the dots. If the conclusions that people are reaching are incorrect then it would have been in Andrews best interests to push for the case to continue to completion. If we go with your argument we are saying that Andrew paid 12m which he almost certainly didn't have in order to try and preserve some face. This doesn't make sense to me because paying someone off for 12m doesn't look good either and would push many to assume guilt. SB |
The consensus is that the Queen paid the hush money to Giuffre. She was hugely wealthy, Andrew was her favourite child & she was probably advised that not settling would lead to plenty of lurid details becoming public, which would have been damaging to the reputation of the family & the monarchy. Andrew's reputation is shot anyway; I assume Charles has the sense to keep him out of public life. |  |
|  |
Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? on 11:59 - Sep 17 with 278 views | Ryorry |
Makes you proud to be British doesn't it? on 09:01 - Sep 17 by Oldsmoker | We could start a sweepstake to guess their identity. I'll take Paz. |
Didn't have any time for Paz, but he was never as patronisingly pompous as this geezer - who I don't think is a returnee actually, if you get my drift. |  |
|  |
| |