| Sheff Weds are VERY good aren’t they? 20:50 - Oct 26 with 5453 views | Wallingford_Boy |
3 horse race this year?
|  |
| |  |
| Sheff Weds are VERY good aren’t they? on 22:27 - Oct 26 with 879 views | tractordownsouth |
| Sheff Weds are VERY good aren’t they? on 22:17 - Oct 26 by itfcjoe |
Only watched second half and they are just a thoroughly dislikable side to watch.
Also not very good, but do have some good players who produce big moments for them but it's nowhere near the quality of play we put together regularly |
They remind me a bit of Town under Lambert, relying on individual quality to carry them through games, which explains their poor record against the top sides. They definitely aren’t as well coached as ourselves or Plymouth. From that perspective, having them in 3rd is probably good for us because it means they’re behind us but not doing badly enough to get rid of Moore. Like Sunderland appointing Alex Neil to get them over the line last year, they’d be able to attract a high quality replacement so hopefully they don’t make a change. |  |
| |
| Sheff Weds are VERY good aren’t they? on 22:45 - Oct 26 with 771 views | clive_baker |
We’re better. Should’ve beaten them at their place, a draw was a robbery. Should be 8 points cleat but I’ll take 5. Hopefully we can extend that over the next 16 games and go into the last 1/3 season with a nice cushion.
We’re going up. |  |
| |
| Sheff Weds are VERY good aren’t they? on 22:48 - Oct 26 with 759 views | theinbetweener |
No, not really.
Take Bannon out of that team and they’d be mid-table mediocrity. |  | | |
| Sheff Weds are VERY good aren’t they? on 23:15 - Oct 26 with 682 views | BlueBadger |
Well, this aged at least as well as your views on Jackson. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
