| Humphreys performance against port vale 16:35 - Oct 27 with 3622 views | hunty21 |
He was great going forward and passing wise however he needs to bulk up which hopefully will overtime against bigger opposition he might struggle defensively and looked missing till the goal in the 1st half hopefully he sees more of the ball |  | | |  |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 13:32 - Oct 28 with 523 views | hunty21 |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 23:44 - Oct 27 by Deano69 |
He got absolutely clatter by their number 10 in the first few seconds, didn’t lose possession, got up and shook himself down and got on with it. Absolutely no problem with his physicality, I would prefer him agile and hard to catch than a bollard.
Absolutely ridiculous to offer criticism like that with such a terrific performance. |
Think you will find i have pointed out negatices and positives of his performance so a balanced view IMO hes had a good start just hope hes not another dozzell who get injured or has more of an end product | | | |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 15:08 - Oct 28 with 479 views | SamWhiteUK |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 20:00 - Oct 27 by Kropotkin123 |
I agree he needs to bulk up with time. But struggling defensively and going missing is absolute nonsense.
Tackles against Port Vale
Cameron Humphreys: 8!
Janoi Donacien: 3
Wes Burns: 3
Leif Davis: 2
Dominic Ball: 2
For context, from memory, that is the most amount of successful tackles I've seen in a single game from a player all season.
In terms of going missing, he made the second-most passes in the game. |
40320 tackles is a hell of a lot, I'll give you that. |  | | |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 15:29 - Oct 28 with 462 views | FrimleyBlue |
I think he said himself he took a little while to find his feet in the game and whilst the way you've said it might have upset a few, you are right in certain aspects however I feel its more that he took a little time to work our where his space was, how the players mark him, what foot do they lead with etc.. Once he found this he suddenly found that extra yard, found the gaps and managed to keep out of problems rather than facing problems when he received the ball. |  |
| |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 15:36 - Oct 28 with 453 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 15:08 - Oct 28 by SamWhiteUK |
40320 tackles is a hell of a lot, I'll give you that. |
Haha, you've done me there! Well played |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 16:09 - Oct 28 with 423 views | Sawtrich |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 00:14 - Oct 28 by BondiBlue |
That had me off my seat. I got more excited by that than the goal. He's a very good technical tackler. Don't need strength if you time your tackles that well. |
Yes, I loved that moment as well, I'm sure we all did!! |  | | |
| Humphreys performance against port vale on 18:18 - Oct 28 with 386 views | SheffordBlue |
Looking at it further Fotmob and FBRef who use Opta data have a 'successful tackle' definition as being one where possession is regained from the tackle. That would rule out e.g a crunching tackle that goes out for an opposition thow in or one which breaks up an attack but is then picked up by an opposition player.
Lies, damned lies and statistics! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
