Connor wickham 18:20 - Feb 4 with 820 views | snipes | 29, fit at present. On a pay as you play , nothing to lose and has been playing more than Hirst Thoughts … |  | | |  |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 with 800 views | pointofblue | Yes, this squad is rubbish and needs even more players if we're going to win promotion... |  |
|  |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 with 798 views | Cheltenham_Blue | No. For the hundredth time. |  |
|  |
Connor wickham on 18:21 - Feb 4 with 784 views | Swansea_Blue | I think this was done to death during the window. If we were going to sign him we’d have done it then. |  |
|  |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 772 views | Nthsuffolkblue | I would have taken Wickham before we signed Hirst. However, we now have Hirst and he hasn't been given a chance. If we decided Hirst was a better choice, we can't write that off on the basis of the little pitch time he has had. |  |
|  |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 770 views | J2BLUE | In the window 100% instead of Hirst but not now. |  |
|  |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 769 views | snipes |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 by pointofblue | Yes, this squad is rubbish and needs even more players if we're going to win promotion... |
He won’t cost a penny , he’s free and he has scored this season . If one of the front players gets injured you have him ready to go |  | |  |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 761 views | Churchman | No. We already have too many players. |  | |  |
Connor wickham on 18:25 - Feb 4 with 710 views | snipes |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 by Cheltenham_Blue | No. For the hundredth time. |
9 goals in 20 games |  | |  |
| |