Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Connor wickham 18:20 - Feb 4 with 601 viewssnipes

29, fit at present. On a pay as you play , nothing to lose
and has been playing more than Hirst
Thoughts …
0
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 with 581 viewspointofblue

Yes, this squad is rubbish and needs even more players if we're going to win promotion...

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 with 579 viewsCheltenham_Blue

No.

For the hundredth time.

Poll: Smooth Mash or Mash with Lumps?

0
Connor wickham on 18:21 - Feb 4 with 565 viewsSwansea_Blue

I think this was done to death during the window. If we were going to sign him we’d have done it then.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 553 viewsNthsuffolkblue

I would have taken Wickham before we signed Hirst. However, we now have Hirst and he hasn't been given a chance. If we decided Hirst was a better choice, we can't write that off on the basis of the little pitch time he has had.

Poll: Is Jeremy Clarkson misogynistic, racist or plain nasty?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 551 viewsJ2BLUE

In the window 100% instead of Hirst but not now.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 550 viewssnipes

Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 by pointofblue

Yes, this squad is rubbish and needs even more players if we're going to win promotion...


He won’t cost a penny , he’s free and he has scored this season . If one of the front players gets injured you have him ready to go
0
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 542 viewsChurchman

No. We already have too many players.
0
Connor wickham on 18:25 - Feb 4 with 491 viewssnipes

Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 by Cheltenham_Blue

No.

For the hundredth time.


9 goals in 20 games
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024