Connor wickham 18:20 - Feb 4 with 601 views | snipes | 29, fit at present. On a pay as you play , nothing to lose and has been playing more than Hirst Thoughts … | | | | |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 with 581 views | pointofblue | Yes, this squad is rubbish and needs even more players if we're going to win promotion... | |
| |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 with 579 views | Cheltenham_Blue | No. For the hundredth time. | |
| |
Connor wickham on 18:21 - Feb 4 with 565 views | Swansea_Blue | I think this was done to death during the window. If we were going to sign him we’d have done it then. | |
| |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 553 views | Nthsuffolkblue | I would have taken Wickham before we signed Hirst. However, we now have Hirst and he hasn't been given a chance. If we decided Hirst was a better choice, we can't write that off on the basis of the little pitch time he has had. | |
| |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 551 views | J2BLUE | In the window 100% instead of Hirst but not now. | |
| |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 550 views | snipes |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 by pointofblue | Yes, this squad is rubbish and needs even more players if we're going to win promotion... |
He won’t cost a penny , he’s free and he has scored this season . If one of the front players gets injured you have him ready to go | | | |
Connor wickham on 18:22 - Feb 4 with 542 views | Churchman | No. We already have too many players. | | | |
Connor wickham on 18:25 - Feb 4 with 491 views | snipes |
Connor wickham on 18:20 - Feb 4 by Cheltenham_Blue | No. For the hundredth time. |
9 goals in 20 games | | | |
| |