Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN 15:03 - Feb 10 with 2102 views | ArnieM | For gods sake stop the pair if them and get Axel / Burgess in there. I’m the summer we need to bring in a couple of decent CB’s who can actually defend. EVERY WEEK we gift soft goals to the opposition. Our CB’s today are a bloody joke. |  |
| |  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:04 - Feb 10 with 2087 views | Herbivore | Ridiculous post again. |  |
|  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:15 - Feb 10 with 2006 views | GavTWTD | I do think Burgess is a step up from Edmundson |  |
|  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:17 - Feb 10 with 1999 views | pointofblue |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:15 - Feb 10 by GavTWTD | I do think Burgess is a step up from Edmundson |
Being left footed helps. |  |
|  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:17 - Feb 10 with 1998 views | Nutkins_Return |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:15 - Feb 10 by GavTWTD | I do think Burgess is a step up from Edmundson |
Edmundson has been really good. Wouldn't have had Burgess back in honestly but slightly more shaky last couple. Goalkeeper can not be letting their second in though. It's miles out and he has to get across. I genuinely think 90% of the divisions keeper keep that out. Hladky isn't a good enough goalkeeper though he's class with his feet. [Post edited 10 Feb 2024 15:19]
|  |
|  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 19:00 - Feb 10 with 1857 views | Alberto_the_frog | That wouldn't have helped as Clarke was rubbish |  | |  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 19:03 - Feb 10 with 1846 views | tractor_lady |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:17 - Feb 10 by pointofblue | Being left footed helps. |
So Fridge right, Burgess left?….. |  | |  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 19:08 - Feb 10 with 1811 views | pointofblue |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 19:03 - Feb 10 by tractor_lady | So Fridge right, Burgess left?….. |
Woolfenden had a blunder today, but is that enough for him to be dropped? I can see him being rested on Wednesday if Clarke can play three games in a week whilst managing his injury, but dropped? We'll see. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 19:35 - Feb 10 with 1728 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 15:15 - Feb 10 by GavTWTD | I do think Burgess is a step up from Edmundson |
I agree, that pass today was not the right ball. Edmundson hasn't had a great deal go his way of late though but still sticks with it. |  |
|  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 19:36 - Feb 10 with 1718 views | BloomBlue | Although Axel was outrun / outmuscled by a Maidstone striker a couple of weeks ago. |  | |  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 05:04 - Feb 11 with 1543 views | PhuketPete | It’s amazing how many recent conceded goals have come thru our right defensive side. But how that translates to wanting Axel and Cam back in is a mystery. For starters Cam wasn’t match fit but even if he was Fridge wouldn’t have been dropped as he has been our best defender lately. I also credit him in part for NB’s goal. Fridge competed strongly to deny their defenders a head on the ball allowing it thru to Nathan. I do think BW would be a step up of his head and body are in the right place. |  | |  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 07:29 - Feb 11 with 1458 views | ibbleobble |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 05:04 - Feb 11 by PhuketPete | It’s amazing how many recent conceded goals have come thru our right defensive side. But how that translates to wanting Axel and Cam back in is a mystery. For starters Cam wasn’t match fit but even if he was Fridge wouldn’t have been dropped as he has been our best defender lately. I also credit him in part for NB’s goal. Fridge competed strongly to deny their defenders a head on the ball allowing it thru to Nathan. I do think BW would be a step up of his head and body are in the right place. |
Exactly this. Clarke’s high-line is the issue and has been for a while. When that ball bounced for their first he was caught in two minds and stuck in no man’s man land. 15 yards back and inline with Wolfenden and we don’t concede. KM had to sort it out - we ship far too many down that side. |  | |  |
Sh1 t defending from the CB’s YET AGAIN on 08:54 - Feb 11 with 1331 views | Mullet | Both goals were down to the midfield, the second one was a terrible decision by Fridge and a result of Harness thinking he could collect that ball. |  |
|  |
| |