Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Natalie Elphicke... 13:14 - May 8 with 13395 viewsTangledupin_Blue

Can't Starmer just refuse to take her and send her back to the swivel-eyed nut-job benches?

Poll: Which Two Will Gain Automatic Promotion?

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:37 - May 9 with 1155 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:30 - May 9 by Herbivore

It sends an important message: that Labour is a home for everyone, even the far right. Well, almost everyone, if you're left of centre you're very much not welcome anymore.


it sends the message that the tories are disintegrating and aren't capable of forming a credible government. important message that.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-1
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:39 - May 9 with 1131 viewsHerbivore

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:37 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

it sends the message that the tories are disintegrating and aren't capable of forming a credible government. important message that.


Yeah, nobody had noticed that before yesterday. Genius.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

3
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:41 - May 9 with 1125 viewsfooters

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:37 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

it sends the message that the tories are disintegrating and aren't capable of forming a credible government. important message that.


So why couldn't she have sat as an independent instead of tarnishing what little reputation Labour have left? Or is it there to attract voters like you?

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:47 - May 9 with 1093 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:41 - May 9 by footers

So why couldn't she have sat as an independent instead of tarnishing what little reputation Labour have left? Or is it there to attract voters like you?


no the strategy is to widen the party's appeal rather than focus on those, like me, who are already committed to it. being endorsed as an imminent government by a former opponent widens the party's reach. it's really not rocket science, but it's still nice to be able to help.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-3
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:49 - May 9 with 1077 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:39 - May 9 by Herbivore

Yeah, nobody had noticed that before yesterday. Genius.


significantly more people, including some of those who it is hard for labour to reach, will have noticed it now.
[Post edited 9 May 2024 13:50]

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-2
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:51 - May 9 with 1057 viewsBlueschev

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:47 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

no the strategy is to widen the party's appeal rather than focus on those, like me, who are already committed to it. being endorsed as an imminent government by a former opponent widens the party's reach. it's really not rocket science, but it's still nice to be able to help.


That's a pretty patronising theory to the electorate to be honest. "We don't like you and you don't like me but lets join forces, they won't remember." Makes both parties look completely spineless.
3
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:55 - May 9 with 1029 viewsfooters

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:47 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

no the strategy is to widen the party's appeal rather than focus on those, like me, who are already committed to it. being endorsed as an imminent government by a former opponent widens the party's reach. it's really not rocket science, but it's still nice to be able to help.


Widen the party's appeal to whom, exactly?

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 13:55 - May 9 with 1027 viewsHerbivore

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:49 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

significantly more people, including some of those who it is hard for labour to reach, will have noticed it now.
[Post edited 9 May 2024 13:50]


Keep telling yourself that if it helps.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:01 - May 9 with 992 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:55 - May 9 by footers

Widen the party's appeal to whom, exactly?


voters? the electorate? citizens? you remember all those millions of people who rejected that corbyn guy. you must remember them surely?

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-2
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:03 - May 9 with 968 viewsfooters

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:01 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

voters? the electorate? citizens? you remember all those millions of people who rejected that corbyn guy. you must remember them surely?


Labour have a 30-point lead. There was absolutely no reason for them to accept Elphicke and endorse her vile views by-proxy.

If you hadn't noticed, a lot of people, including shadow ministers, aren't very happy about it either. But hey, what do they know?

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:11 - May 9 with 929 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:03 - May 9 by footers

Labour have a 30-point lead. There was absolutely no reason for them to accept Elphicke and endorse her vile views by-proxy.

If you hadn't noticed, a lot of people, including shadow ministers, aren't very happy about it either. But hey, what do they know?


what have shadow ministers said?

labour has a 30 point lead precisely because starmer is taking every opportunity to widen its appeal.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-3
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:14 - May 9 with 910 viewsfooters

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:11 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

what have shadow ministers said?

labour has a 30 point lead precisely because starmer is taking every opportunity to widen its appeal.


keep up slowhouse

One shadow cabinet minister said: “People are upset and angry right across the party about the decision.”

Another shadow minister said: “Logically or politically, we didn’t need this … I worry that they’ll not have done sufficient due diligence on her.” They added: “Her hard-right views are a big red line too. Are we welcoming Nigel Farage next week?”

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

1
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:17 - May 9 with 894 viewsHerbivore

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:11 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

what have shadow ministers said?

labour has a 30 point lead precisely because starmer is taking every opportunity to widen its appeal.


Labour has a 30 point lead because at this point everyone, including life long Tories, despises the Tories. Accepting Natalie Elphicke into the party isn't the masterstroke you seem to think it is, most of the debate today is about whether it's a misstep from Starmer, not how much of a shambles the Tories are as everyone already knows that after 14 years of mismanagement.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:19 - May 9 with 879 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:14 - May 9 by footers

keep up slowhouse

One shadow cabinet minister said: “People are upset and angry right across the party about the decision.”

Another shadow minister said: “Logically or politically, we didn’t need this … I worry that they’ll not have done sufficient due diligence on her.” They added: “Her hard-right views are a big red line too. Are we welcoming Nigel Farage next week?”


unattributed. off the record lobby gossip to the guardian is the westminster equivalent of someone tutting under their breath.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:19 - May 9 with 863 viewsGlasgowBlue

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:26 - May 9 by DJR

Following on with a theme I touched on in an earlier post, this is an interesting passage from today's Politics Live in the Guardian.

There is a lot more about Diane Abbott, and the purge of leftwingers under Keir Starmer, in Andy Beckett’s new book about the Labour left, The Searchers, an insightful, sympathetic, brilliantly researched and extremely readable 50-year history of the Labour left told through the biographies of five of its leading players: Tony Benn, Ken Livingstone, Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell and Abbott. Beckett argues that under Starmer the party is imposing “a level of ideological control not even achieved by New Labour at its most intolerant”.


Changing the subject slightly, you’re a big fan of the SNP. Are you happy that Kate Forbes, somebody whose views are even further to the right than Elphicke, has been appointed deputy leader of the SNP?

Would there be similar outrage on here if Forbes defected to Labour?

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:22 - May 9 with 847 viewsfooters

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:19 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

unattributed. off the record lobby gossip to the guardian is the westminster equivalent of someone tutting under their breath.


Ah, so now we can't trust anything in the press because you think you know better.

Have a guess what? All the headlines are about what a bad decision it was, as Herb points out.

You are Nigel Pearson and I claim my five pounds.

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:22 - May 9 with 835 viewsGlasgowBlue

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:47 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

no the strategy is to widen the party's appeal rather than focus on those, like me, who are already committed to it. being endorsed as an imminent government by a former opponent widens the party's reach. it's really not rocket science, but it's still nice to be able to help.


I like how some people were slavishly supportive of the previous leadership at a time when they were the first party since the BNP to have been found guilty of racial discrimination by the EHRC, yet now leat that this move dents their credibility.

Says a lot about those people imo.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:24 - May 9 with 836 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:17 - May 9 by Herbivore

Labour has a 30 point lead because at this point everyone, including life long Tories, despises the Tories. Accepting Natalie Elphicke into the party isn't the masterstroke you seem to think it is, most of the debate today is about whether it's a misstep from Starmer, not how much of a shambles the Tories are as everyone already knows that after 14 years of mismanagement.


you are confusing your own bubble with what is gong on outside it. your concept of "everyone" excludes lots of the electorate.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-3
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:24 - May 9 with 833 viewsitfcjoe

Natalie Elphicke... on 13:34 - May 9 by DJR

The Labour spokesman said yesterday that standing for another seat was a possibility, and Annelisa Dodds confirmed this when interviewed this morning.
[Post edited 9 May 2024 13:36]


I hadn't seen that, I can't imagine it will end up being the case though

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:27 - May 9 with 805 viewsHerbivore

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:24 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

you are confusing your own bubble with what is gong on outside it. your concept of "everyone" excludes lots of the electorate.


Yes mate, it's definitely in my own bubble only that people recognise that the Tories are a shambles, it's not like they've spent months polling horrifically or anything. Until yesterday, the general perception was clearly that the Tories were the party of competence and stability, then Natalie Elphicke defected to Labour and BOOM! suddenly the scales fell from the electorate's eyes and only now can they see that the Tories are awful. It's you who lives in a bubble, mate, but the kind that isn't blown from the mouth.
[Post edited 9 May 2024 14:30]

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

1
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:28 - May 9 with 805 viewsBlueschev

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:24 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

you are confusing your own bubble with what is gong on outside it. your concept of "everyone" excludes lots of the electorate.


I very much doubt the two of you are acquaintances in real life? Yet you both seem to be making quite big assertions about how the other has come to their position.
1
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:31 - May 9 with 774 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:22 - May 9 by footers

Ah, so now we can't trust anything in the press because you think you know better.

Have a guess what? All the headlines are about what a bad decision it was, as Herb points out.

You are Nigel Pearson and I claim my five pounds.


i don't think that just knowing how lobby gossip works is really any claim to "know better". it's well known that the threshold for off the record one liners is very low. politicians keep journalists sweet by giving them something unattributable to fill space with.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-1
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:34 - May 9 with 751 viewsGlasgowBlue

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:19 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

unattributed. off the record lobby gossip to the guardian is the westminster equivalent of someone tutting under their breath.


I wouldn’t bother mate. These people were happy with grubby little racists and paid shills of the Iranian regime like Ken Livingston, Chris WIlliamson and Jeremy Corbyn being in the party.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:37 - May 9 with 736 viewslowhouseblue

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:27 - May 9 by Herbivore

Yes mate, it's definitely in my own bubble only that people recognise that the Tories are a shambles, it's not like they've spent months polling horrifically or anything. Until yesterday, the general perception was clearly that the Tories were the party of competence and stability, then Natalie Elphicke defected to Labour and BOOM! suddenly the scales fell from the electorate's eyes and only now can they see that the Tories are awful. It's you who lives in a bubble, mate, but the kind that isn't blown from the mouth.
[Post edited 9 May 2024 14:30]


you said "most of the debate today is about whether it's a misstep from starmer". that may be true in your bubble, it isn't true for most of the electorate. most of the electorate will have seen or heard a one sentence headline - 'another tory mp defects to labour'. outside of your bubble few people will be thinking about missteps.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-1
Natalie Elphicke... on 14:43 - May 9 with 708 viewsHerbivore

Natalie Elphicke... on 14:37 - May 9 by lowhouseblue

you said "most of the debate today is about whether it's a misstep from starmer". that may be true in your bubble, it isn't true for most of the electorate. most of the electorate will have seen or heard a one sentence headline - 'another tory mp defects to labour'. outside of your bubble few people will be thinking about missteps.


Nobody I know is talking about it, I'm talking about the media coverage so hardly my own bubble. Glad you've been out talking to all of the electorate though in order to know what they're really thinking rather than just making stuff up to justify your unprincipled stance on this.

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025