Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... 21:42 - Jan 27 with 1495 viewsVaughan8

When we played Arsenal Odegaard got fouled (apparently.,.....) and received treatment and didn't have to go off for 30 seconds. People said on here it is because if you are fouled then that 30 seconds off doesn't count. Sounds reasonable.

Haven't thought much about it until now, watching the Burnley v Leeds, Brownhill has just down while being fouled, received treatment and had to go off for 30 seconds?

0
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:43 - Jan 27 with 1452 viewsSwansea_Blue

Did the other guy get a yellow card?

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:44 - Jan 27 with 1443 viewsredrickstuhaart

Its only if carded.

Though it seems to have been applied in very variable fashion of late.
1
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:44 - Jan 27 with 1444 viewsSitfcB

It’s when the offender gets a yellow card the player who receives treatment doesn’t have to go off.

COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

0
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:46 - Jan 27 with 1406 viewsSwansea_Blue

Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:44 - Jan 27 by SitfcB

It’s when the offender gets a yellow card the player who receives treatment doesn’t have to go off.


As long as the treatment is done ‘quickly’ (don’t you just love the way they keep introducing subjective criteria into the Laws of the Game?).

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

1
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:50 - Jan 27 with 1369 viewsVaughan8

Ah Ok. Thanks people!

I must have missed the booking part!
0
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:53 - Jan 27 with 1330 viewsNeedhamChris

Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:46 - Jan 27 by Swansea_Blue

As long as the treatment is done ‘quickly’ (don’t you just love the way they keep introducing subjective criteria into the Laws of the Game?).


You say that like subjectivity is new...

Goal scoring opportunity, violent conduct, diving, the list of subjective decisions goes on and on. I'd say this one is one of the least controversial

Winner of the "most obvious troll ever seen on here" award, sponsored by _Clive_Baker
Poll: If McKenna had gone to Brighton - do you think we'd have had...

0
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:55 - Jan 27 with 1306 viewsHighgateBlue

Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:44 - Jan 27 by SitfcB

It’s when the offender gets a yellow card the player who receives treatment doesn’t have to go off.


This makes absolutely no sense.

You can get a yellow card for persistent fouling. If you foul players A, B, C and D, and then get a yellow for persistent fouling, why the hell should it cause player D not to have to go off, when exactly the same (unlawful) tackle on player D without first having committed any fouls would cause him to have to go off?
1
Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 22:01 - Jan 27 with 1245 viewsberkstractorboy

Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:55 - Jan 27 by HighgateBlue

This makes absolutely no sense.

You can get a yellow card for persistent fouling. If you foul players A, B, C and D, and then get a yellow for persistent fouling, why the hell should it cause player D not to have to go off, when exactly the same (unlawful) tackle on player D without first having committed any fouls would cause him to have to go off?


Its the FA, there is an awful lot that doesn't make sense.
0
Login to get fewer ads

Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 08:16 - Jan 28 with 662 viewsSwansea_Blue

Can someone clear up this rule for me...... on 21:53 - Jan 27 by NeedhamChris

You say that like subjectivity is new...

Goal scoring opportunity, violent conduct, diving, the list of subjective decisions goes on and on. I'd say this one is one of the least controversial


Oh I agree, it’s not at all new. But they can’t help themselves in adding more. It’s as if they do it deliberately to create controversy to get people talking and generate more publicity.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025