| Rachel Reeves 22:57 - Feb 13 with 7799 views | blueasfook |
When's she gonna come clean and admit she only did a work placement from school at the BoE? |  |
| |  |
| Rachel Reeves on 22:33 - Feb 14 with 667 views | DJR |
| Rachel Reeves on 13:36 - Feb 14 by J2BLUE |
Doubt it. I imagine you to be Frank Pickle. [Post edited 14 Feb 13:36]
|
I looked up who he is and he sounds like me down to a T.
Frank Pickle is the likable but boring and pedantic clerk of the parish council. He is so boring that nobody listens to him, even when he tries to relate such momentous events such as "the time he went down to the pub and they'd completely run out of crisps" or "the time when the milkman was 47 minutes late" or "when he heard a cuckoo in March, only it turned out to be a pigeon". |  | | |
| Rachel Reeves on 22:43 - Feb 14 with 632 views | Dubtractor |
Parking any views on Reeve's performance as chancellor, this BBC story is beyond piss weak, and yet they keep on pushing it. |  |
| |
| GDP per head fell… on 10:10 - Feb 15 with 481 views | StokieBlue |
| GDP per head fell… on 13:25 - Feb 14 by Bloots |
…it’s a more accurate measure.
So technically he is right. |
Whether it's a more accurate measure depends on what you are trying to measure, it's a different measure and certainly wasn't what was being cited in the thread originally although I can understand why you've moved the goalposts.
GDP per capita is economic output by head of population and thus can be used as an indicator to current standards of living (which everyone knows have been decreasing for a long time) whereas Growth (or just GDP) is an indicator of the expansion of a countries economy overall.
For instance, GDP per capita can still reduce even if an economy is booming if immigration is very high and GDP growth can increase if one sector is doing amazingly well but in reality the general trend is downward.
So technically, he wasn't right.
SB |  | | |
| Rachel Reeves on 11:31 - Feb 15 with 417 views | vapour_trail |
| Rachel Reeves on 13:35 - Feb 14 by PassionNotAnger |
How is that response not trolling?!
He corrected something you said in your previous post with an absolute fact - he didn't use bad language or insult you but you just come back with this?
It's just childish |
Succinctly summed up two decades of his posting history on these pages.
And that of his mate. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
