Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds 22:41 - Jul 22 with 1402 viewshunty21

If the year was 2026 that england Lioness goal wouldn't have stood
[Post edited 23 Jul 6:52]
2
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:49 - Jul 22 with 1300 viewsEastTownBlue

Hopefully not but FIFA will need to get that approved by IFAB first.
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:52 - Jul 22 with 1269 viewsVaughan8

Of all the rules they could change............!

Seems a silly to me and could cause confusion (i.e. if it hits the post does that mean its still in play?)
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:54 - Jul 22 with 1264 viewsCheltenham_Blue

England Women won’t be playing in 2026. And if the last US World Cup is anything to go by, anything that gets it over with quicker will help.

Poll: Is it more annoying when builders

0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:56 - Jul 22 with 1247 viewsSmoresy

On the other hand I love a penalty save when it goes the right way. Letting keeper and fans go crazy without the immediate jeopardy of rebounds or open play could bring some cool moments.
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:58 - Jul 22 with 1213 viewsMark

Absolutely. The ball is back in play after a penalty, always has been. Leave the rules of football alone!
3
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:04 - Jul 22 with 1164 viewsDeano69

Ridiculous isn’t.

So many bits they could improve on but rather fanny about with something that has worked well for decades. Just plain daft.

Poll: Best Tin of Chocolates

0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:05 - Jul 22 with 1154 viewsRadioOrwell

Disagree. One shot. That's it.

Never ever liked the rebound goal.
1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:14 - Jul 22 with 1100 viewsTrequartista

Don't think the rule about auxiliary verbs is changing though.

Poll: Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

2
Login to get fewer ads

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:16 - Jul 22 with 1080 viewsBigalhunter

Wouldn’t have.

Three down….just two more to go..(WhatsApp Group, July 2025)
Poll: September 2025. Which one?

3
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:22 - Jul 22 with 1005 viewsWhos_blue

I can't see the need to mess with this at all.
What benefit does it bring?
Just nonsense.
So many things are going from the game.
I'm not sure they even list missed pens in final scores anymore.
Oh for the days of:
Missed pen - Kelly 119
Goal - Kelly 119

Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness.

1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:27 - Jul 22 with 953 viewsSimonBatfordITFC

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:52 - Jul 22 by Vaughan8

Of all the rules they could change............!

Seems a silly to me and could cause confusion (i.e. if it hits the post does that mean its still in play?)


Imagine it’d be once the ball stops moving forwards, same as in penalty shoot out.
1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:28 - Jul 22 with 939 viewsSimonBatfordITFC

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:54 - Jul 22 by Cheltenham_Blue

England Women won’t be playing in 2026. And if the last US World Cup is anything to go by, anything that gets it over with quicker will help.


What a load of rubbish. Of course they will.
1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:50 - Jul 22 with 850 viewsJ2BLUE

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:05 - Jul 22 by RadioOrwell

Disagree. One shot. That's it.

Never ever liked the rebound goal.


Why keep changing things which slow the game down?

Let it flow. When you allow the game to flow instead of stopping every three seconds you get magic like this

[Post edited 22 Jul 23:51]

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 01:51 - Jul 23 with 691 viewsTheMoralMajority

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:52 - Jul 22 by Vaughan8

Of all the rules they could change............!

Seems a silly to me and could cause confusion (i.e. if it hits the post does that mean its still in play?)


The ball is effectively dead as soon as the penalty is taken.

Either it ends up in the net (goal) or it doesn't (goal kick).

...but do signatures really work?

0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 03:17 - Jul 23 with 636 viewsIllinoisblue

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:05 - Jul 22 by RadioOrwell

Disagree. One shot. That's it.

Never ever liked the rebound goal.


What about free kicks?

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 06:51 - Jul 23 with 459 viewshunty21

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:14 - Jul 22 by Trequartista

Don't think the rule about auxiliary verbs is changing though.


Here we go again
..
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 07:43 - Jul 23 with 337 viewshunty21

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 01:51 - Jul 23 by TheMoralMajority

The ball is effectively dead as soon as the penalty is taken.

Either it ends up in the net (goal) or it doesn't (goal kick).


Yep like ice hockey rules ...
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:29 - Jul 23 with 223 viewsScuzzer

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:05 - Jul 22 by RadioOrwell

Disagree. One shot. That's it.

Never ever liked the rebound goal.


Yeah...that's what the game needs...fewer goals.

Established 1968

1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:39 - Jul 23 with 182 viewsArnoldMoorhen

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:05 - Jul 22 by RadioOrwell

Disagree. One shot. That's it.

Never ever liked the rebound goal.


It is only one shot, like any shot, and then the ball either goes in, or off the pitch, and is dead, or comes back into play and is live.

Why should a direct free kick from just outside the area, which the keeper saves brilliantly by fingertipping it onto the bar, be treated differently if it then falls back into the area?

Or a corner? One shot only, then the ref blows up?

Or how about a striker running through one-on-one on goal, and the keeper saves with their legs? Whistle up quick ref, it was a save!
1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:42 - Jul 23 with 157 viewsArnoldMoorhen

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:27 - Jul 22 by SimonBatfordITFC

Imagine it’d be once the ball stops moving forwards, same as in penalty shoot out.


So if the keeper claws the ball out, when most, but not all, of the ball is behind the line, and onto the post, which it hits and then goes in...

...would we have to have VAR to if the ball went forward before it hit the post, and was therefore dead?
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:58 - Jul 23 with 95 viewsSimonBatfordITFC

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:42 - Jul 23 by ArnoldMoorhen

So if the keeper claws the ball out, when most, but not all, of the ball is behind the line, and onto the post, which it hits and then goes in...

...would we have to have VAR to if the ball went forward before it hit the post, and was therefore dead?


Fair point and actually I’d remembered the law incorrectly. Currently the laws for a shootout state:

“The kick is completed when the ball stops moving, goes out of play or the referee stops play for any offence; the kicker may not play the ball a second time”

I guess that’d need updating to state that nobody other than the keeper can touch the ball after it’s been kicked.

Not a fan of the proposed change myself.
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 09:14 - Jul 23 with 44 viewsSimonBatfordITFC

And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:58 - Jul 23 by SimonBatfordITFC

Fair point and actually I’d remembered the law incorrectly. Currently the laws for a shootout state:

“The kick is completed when the ball stops moving, goes out of play or the referee stops play for any offence; the kicker may not play the ball a second time”

I guess that’d need updating to state that nobody other than the keeper can touch the ball after it’s been kicked.

Not a fan of the proposed change myself.


But now I have visions of the goalkeeper partying the shot and then dribbling up the field and scoring in the opposition goal without the ball stopping moving.

God knows how they’ll word it. Stick it in the bin.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025