By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
On the other hand I love a penalty save when it goes the right way. Letting keeper and fans go crazy without the immediate jeopardy of rebounds or open play could bring some cool moments.
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 22:58 - Jul 22 with 1678 views
I can't see the need to mess with this at all. What benefit does it bring? Just nonsense. So many things are going from the game. I'm not sure they even list missed pens in final scores anymore. Oh for the days of: Missed pen - Kelly 119 Goal - Kelly 119
Distortion becomes somehow pure in its wildness.
2
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:27 - Jul 22 with 1415 views
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:05 - Jul 22 by RadioOrwell
Disagree. One shot. That's it.
Never ever liked the rebound goal.
It is only one shot, like any shot, and then the ball either goes in, or off the pitch, and is dead, or comes back into play and is live.
Why should a direct free kick from just outside the area, which the keeper saves brilliantly by fingertipping it onto the bar, be treated differently if it then falls back into the area?
Or a corner? One shot only, then the ref blows up?
Or how about a striker running through one-on-one on goal, and the keeper saves with their legs? Whistle up quick ref, it was a save!
2
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:42 - Jul 23 with 622 views
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:42 - Jul 23 by ArnoldMoorhen
So if the keeper claws the ball out, when most, but not all, of the ball is behind the line, and onto the post, which it hits and then goes in...
...would we have to have VAR to if the ball went forward before it hit the post, and was therefore dead?
Fair point and actually I’d remembered the law incorrectly. Currently the laws for a shootout state:
“The kick is completed when the ball stops moving, goes out of play or the referee stops play for any offence; the kicker may not play the ball a second time”
I guess that’d need updating to state that nobody other than the keeper can touch the ball after it’s been kicked.
Not a fan of the proposed change myself.
1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 09:14 - Jul 23 with 506 views
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:58 - Jul 23 by SimonBatfordITFC
Fair point and actually I’d remembered the law incorrectly. Currently the laws for a shootout state:
“The kick is completed when the ball stops moving, goes out of play or the referee stops play for any offence; the kicker may not play the ball a second time”
I guess that’d need updating to state that nobody other than the keeper can touch the ball after it’s been kicked.
Not a fan of the proposed change myself.
But now I have visions of the goalkeeper partying the shot and then dribbling up the field and scoring in the opposition goal without the ball stopping moving.
God knows how they’ll word it. Stick it in the bin.
1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 09:37 - Jul 23 with 456 views
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:58 - Jul 23 by SimonBatfordITFC
Fair point and actually I’d remembered the law incorrectly. Currently the laws for a shootout state:
“The kick is completed when the ball stops moving, goes out of play or the referee stops play for any offence; the kicker may not play the ball a second time”
I guess that’d need updating to state that nobody other than the keeper can touch the ball after it’s been kicked.
Not a fan of the proposed change myself.
If that is really the wording then it is theoretically possible that a hard penalty could be saved by the keepers legs, rebound out of the area towards the half way line, and a player from the attacking team could intercept it before it stops moving, keep it moving, dribble into the area, go round the keeper and score, without breaching those terms and conditions!
If the rules for a shootout say that all players apart from the penalty taker and keeper have to be behind the Half Way line, there is still the theoretical possibility of the ball rebounding that far out, and then one of the penalty taker's team doing a Beastie from behind the Halfway line while the keeper is celebrating.
1
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 09:41 - Jul 23 with 434 views
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 08:39 - Jul 23 by ArnoldMoorhen
It is only one shot, like any shot, and then the ball either goes in, or off the pitch, and is dead, or comes back into play and is live.
Why should a direct free kick from just outside the area, which the keeper saves brilliantly by fingertipping it onto the bar, be treated differently if it then falls back into the area?
Or a corner? One shot only, then the ref blows up?
Or how about a striker running through one-on-one on goal, and the keeper saves with their legs? Whistle up quick ref, it was a save!
yeah maybe you're right.
0
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 09:50 - Jul 23 with 403 views
And this is why you should allow penalty rebounds on 23:50 - Jul 22 by J2BLUE
Why keep changing things which slow the game down?
Let it flow. When you allow the game to flow instead of stopping every three seconds you get magic like this
[Post edited 22 Jul 23:51]
And of course the daddy of them all. Play Off Semi. 2-2 on aggregate. Last minute of injury time penalty save, rebound save, up the other and score the winner.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
