Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Banksy 20:33 - Sep 10 with 2469 viewswrightsrightglove

Has this been discussed? Really powerful bit of artwork which they’ve now tried to remove but it’s only made it even more powerful in a classic Banksy way. Makes me wonder whether he’s used some form of paint / technique where he knew they’d try and remove it and he knew exactly how it would look after they tried to do so? Could prove to become more famous than the shredder incident
0
Banksy on 14:17 - Sep 11 with 394 viewsWeWereZombies

Banksy on 14:01 - Sep 11 by lowhouseblue

how about starting with people who shop here:

https://hanguppictures.com/artists/banksy


Yes, very clever, now on the subject of definitions and their use in adult debate...

Poll: Jack Clarke is

0
Banksy on 14:29 - Sep 11 with 347 viewsmellowblue

Banksy on 09:06 - Sep 11 by WeWereZombies

Auctioneers use gavels...


and American judges, to maintain order.
0
Banksy on 14:36 - Sep 11 with 314 viewsBlueschev

Banksy on 07:50 - Sep 11 by lowhouseblue

it's worse than trite. it's cliched and unchallenging - it's conformist, safe, unoriginal, and going along with the dominant middle class political world view. there's nothing vaguely unexpected in it. the reaction of everyone who thinks it's great will be "oh yes, i agree with that." if that's what he trades in why doesn't he just stick it on a tea towel or a biscuit tin? but doubtless his bank account will benefit from the publicity. i hope they're passing on to him the cost of repairing the damage to a grade 1 listed building.


Is there anyone to the left of Tony Blair you don't hold in utter contempt?
0
Banksy on 14:49 - Sep 11 with 284 viewsWeWereZombies

Banksy on 14:29 - Sep 11 by mellowblue

and American judges, to maintain order.


I was thinking more in terms of deals being made by knocking something on the head, maybe a bit too tenuous for an off the cuff remark.

Poll: Jack Clarke is

0
Banksy on 14:56 - Sep 11 with 265 viewsDJR

Banksy on 07:46 - Sep 11 by BanksterDebtSlave

The law is being used to suppress dissent, politicians make them, judges enact them, what is Banksy missing in his symbolism?


It is magistrates and juries which decide guilt in criminal trials in England and Wales?

I am also puzzled as to why he put it on the Royal Courts of Justice (which apart from appeals from the Crown Court to the Court of Appeal) deals with civil cases. The Old Bailey or Westminster Magistrates Court would probably have been a better location but probably each of those is less sheltered from public gaze when it comes to painting such things.

[Post edited 11 Sep 15:07]
0
Banksy on 15:09 - Sep 11 with 229 viewslowhouseblue

Banksy on 14:36 - Sep 11 by Blueschev

Is there anyone to the left of Tony Blair you don't hold in utter contempt?


lots and lots of people. from politics, for example starmer, and most of the government along with every previous labour leader except one. it's only the shouty, online left that i find i have less and less patience for. plus banksy would be fine if he did the occasional cartoon in the guardian - as long as you're not expecting to be in any way surprised by it - but instead he's turned reaffirmingly unchallenging pap into a multi-million pound business.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

-2
Banksy on 15:13 - Sep 11 with 221 viewsmellowblue

Banksy on 14:49 - Sep 11 by WeWereZombies

I was thinking more in terms of deals being made by knocking something on the head, maybe a bit too tenuous for an off the cuff remark.


ha, I see your drift.
0
Banksy on 15:17 - Sep 11 with 199 viewsSwansea_Blue

Banksy on 09:06 - Sep 11 by WeWereZombies

Auctioneers use gavels...


I’m not sold on that idea

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Banksy on 15:21 - Sep 11 with 189 viewsThe_Flashing_Smile

Banksy on 13:45 - Sep 11 by lowhouseblue

where have i said that i "think damage to a wall is more problematic than people's rights to protest being eroded"? arguing against the erosion of the right to protest while at the same time opposing vandalism to our national heritage by the hackneyed daubs of a self-promoting multi-millionaire are not in anyway incompatible. cliched is defined as "showing a lack of originality; based on frequently repeated phrases or opinions" and nothing describes bansky better. he makes his millions and runs his business by quoting back their own opinions to the privileged classes to that they can say "oh he thinks the same as me and everyone i know - he must be clever, and if he's clever we must be as well". seldom have the emperor's new clothes been worn with self-congratulatory smugness to match that of banksy.
[Post edited 11 Sep 13:53]


We were talking about this piece of art rather than Banksy generally.

What's cliched and non-challenging about this piece of art? Given this thread and the fact we're discussing it from opposite sides suggests neither of those are true.

In your previous post you ridiculued the message of the art and said you "hope they're passing on to him the cost of repairing the damage to a grade 1 listed building" - so it looks very much like you care more about the building than the message.

You seem to have a massive chip on your shoulder about an artist, which is rather odd... but then art is meant to inflame, so I guess it's done its job.

Trust the process. Trust Phil.
Blog: Flowing Moves - The Poetry Of Ipswich Town, No.4

0
Banksy on 15:24 - Sep 11 with 175 viewsThe_Flashing_Smile

Banksy on 15:09 - Sep 11 by lowhouseblue

lots and lots of people. from politics, for example starmer, and most of the government along with every previous labour leader except one. it's only the shouty, online left that i find i have less and less patience for. plus banksy would be fine if he did the occasional cartoon in the guardian - as long as you're not expecting to be in any way surprised by it - but instead he's turned reaffirmingly unchallenging pap into a multi-million pound business.


LOL. You call him cliched and unchallenging and then suggested he'd be fine if he did the occasional cartoon in the Guardian?!?

You're all over the place, again.

Trust the process. Trust Phil.
Blog: Flowing Moves - The Poetry Of Ipswich Town, No.4

0
Banksy on 15:45 - Sep 11 with 138 viewslowhouseblue

Banksy on 15:21 - Sep 11 by The_Flashing_Smile

We were talking about this piece of art rather than Banksy generally.

What's cliched and non-challenging about this piece of art? Given this thread and the fact we're discussing it from opposite sides suggests neither of those are true.

In your previous post you ridiculued the message of the art and said you "hope they're passing on to him the cost of repairing the damage to a grade 1 listed building" - so it looks very much like you care more about the building than the message.

You seem to have a massive chip on your shoulder about an artist, which is rather odd... but then art is meant to inflame, so I guess it's done its job.


judges with gavels oppressing people is a pretty tired trope in political cartoons. every paper will have some version at some point. the first one on this page is the first one i found:

https://www.toonsmag.com/editorial-cartoons-in-holding-governments/

it's unchallenging because its giving you something you agree with. it's safe and tells you that you're views are right. it's about as challenging as a richard osman book.
[Post edited 11 Sep 15:51]

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

0
Banksy on 15:48 - Sep 11 with 120 viewslowhouseblue

Banksy on 15:24 - Sep 11 by The_Flashing_Smile

LOL. You call him cliched and unchallenging and then suggested he'd be fine if he did the occasional cartoon in the Guardian?!?

You're all over the place, again.


it would give guardian readers* what they most desire - their own views echoing back to them. it's not exactly a great compliment.

* the same is of course also true of other newspapers - it's how they all work.

And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show

0
Banksy on 15:57 - Sep 11 with 90 viewsThe_Flashing_Smile

Banksy on 15:45 - Sep 11 by lowhouseblue

judges with gavels oppressing people is a pretty tired trope in political cartoons. every paper will have some version at some point. the first one on this page is the first one i found:

https://www.toonsmag.com/editorial-cartoons-in-holding-governments/

it's unchallenging because its giving you something you agree with. it's safe and tells you that you're views are right. it's about as challenging as a richard osman book.
[Post edited 11 Sep 15:51]


It's clearly challenged you as evidenced in this thread!

And this is 'justice' (rather than a judge per se) against people wishing to protest, which is a bit different.

So art is only challenging if you disagree with it? That's a new one on me. And also doesn't makes sense as some people will agree and some will disagree. So the challenging aspect depends on the viewer's POV rather than the art itself.

Trust the process. Trust Phil.
Blog: Flowing Moves - The Poetry Of Ipswich Town, No.4

0
Banksy on 16:47 - Sep 11 with 21 viewsClapham_Junction

Banksy on 08:26 - Sep 11 by BanksterDebtSlave

Middle class concerns....lol


'middle class' is the new 'champagne socialist'
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025