Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Chris Wilder 19:57 - Sep 14 with 994 viewsITFCMonk

Am I right in thinking he could potentially be on a double wage if his previous contract was paid out? Or do some sackings not cost money?

S A Monk

0
Apparently they are just.... on 19:58 - Sep 14 with 973 viewsBloots

....reinstating him back on his previous contract.

"Trite Sixth-Form Politics” - TWTD User (Sept 2025)

0
Chris Wilder on 20:00 - Sep 14 with 948 viewsBlueandTruesince82

My guess would be that he wasn't paid all at once and they are still paying him (as we were woth Lambert). I assume that there will be a clause in the contract that means if he takes another role Sheff U no longer have to pay him or pay a reduced amount and i would imagine that will then get wrapped into his new contract or, clause depending him returning is seen as a new managerial role and they will just negotiate a new contract but if I was Wilder id be playing hardball

Poll: Will Phil ever confirm we are actually close on a signing ever again

0
Chris Wilder on 20:05 - Sep 14 with 899 viewsPhilTWTD

Chris Wilder on 20:00 - Sep 14 by BlueandTruesince82

My guess would be that he wasn't paid all at once and they are still paying him (as we were woth Lambert). I assume that there will be a clause in the contract that means if he takes another role Sheff U no longer have to pay him or pay a reduced amount and i would imagine that will then get wrapped into his new contract or, clause depending him returning is seen as a new managerial role and they will just negotiate a new contract but if I was Wilder id be playing hardball


I would guess they hadn't had time to agree a settlement of his contract or he wasn't interested in doing so as he assumed he'd get another job soon enough, at which point they'd stop paying him.

I very much doubt Lambert continued to be paid for too long after he left, these deals usually have cut-off clauses after sackings.
0
Chris Wilder on 20:16 - Sep 14 with 761 viewsVic

Chris Wilder on 20:05 - Sep 14 by PhilTWTD

I would guess they hadn't had time to agree a settlement of his contract or he wasn't interested in doing so as he assumed he'd get another job soon enough, at which point they'd stop paying him.

I very much doubt Lambert continued to be paid for too long after he left, these deals usually have cut-off clauses after sackings.


You mean you don’t think we’re we’re paying him until a few months ago? You’ve just spoilt a lovely urban myth.

Poll: Right now, who would you rather have as Prime Minister?

0
Chris Wilder on 20:36 - Sep 14 with 597 viewsBlueandTruesince82

Chris Wilder on 20:16 - Sep 14 by Vic

You mean you don’t think we’re we’re paying him until a few months ago? You’ve just spoilt a lovely urban myth.


This. I thought we paid Lambert the full 4 years? Phil are you saying thats not the case? How long dod we pay him for?

Poll: Will Phil ever confirm we are actually close on a signing ever again

0
Chris Wilder on 20:37 - Sep 14 with 587 viewsPhilTWTD

Chris Wilder on 20:36 - Sep 14 by BlueandTruesince82

This. I thought we paid Lambert the full 4 years? Phil are you saying thats not the case? How long dod we pay him for?


Of course, I don't think I've ever heard anyone seriously suggest that was the case.
0
Chris Wilder on 20:43 - Sep 14 with 537 viewsolimar

Chris Wilder on 20:37 - Sep 14 by PhilTWTD

Of course, I don't think I've ever heard anyone seriously suggest that was the case.


Always remember the fuss when Magilton went to QPR, seemingly people at ITFC were delighted as it meant we stopped paying him.
If its dependent on not getting any other form of employment, I imagine a settlement is pretty much a given quite early on.
0
Chris Wilder on 20:51 - Sep 14 with 470 viewsPhilTWTD

Chris Wilder on 20:43 - Sep 14 by olimar

Always remember the fuss when Magilton went to QPR, seemingly people at ITFC were delighted as it meant we stopped paying him.
If its dependent on not getting any other form of employment, I imagine a settlement is pretty much a given quite early on.


Often that's the case. Or there are break clauses at various stages.
0
Login to get fewer ads

Chris Wilder on 22:36 - Sep 14 with 51 viewsSitfcB

Chris Wilder on 20:37 - Sep 14 by PhilTWTD

Of course, I don't think I've ever heard anyone seriously suggest that was the case.


He said himself he was, not publicly mind.
[Post edited 14 Sep 22:36]

COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025