| Walliams eh? 22:46 - Dec 19 with 1594 views | Zx1988 |
Never saw that one coming.
|  |
| |  |
| Walliams eh? on 09:48 - Dec 20 with 1098 views | NthQldITFC |
Darty bistird. |  |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 09:49 - Dec 20 with 1094 views | wischip |
Computer Says No |  | | |
| Walliams eh? on 11:40 - Dec 20 with 931 views | Zx1988 |
Why is it always the ones you most suspect? | |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 11:49 - Dec 20 with 902 views | mellowblue |
| Walliams eh? on 11:40 - Dec 20 by Zx1988 |
Why is it always the ones you most suspect? |
and always hiding in plain sight | | | |
| Walliams eh? on 12:06 - Dec 20 with 857 views | Zx1988 |
| Walliams eh? on 11:49 - Dec 20 by mellowblue |
and always hiding in plain sight |
And protected by the system as well.
Whoever knew enough to put those 'lone female' rules in place should have refused to work with him, rather than put in place mitigation measures.
Twas ever thus, and ever thus shall be.
Assuming these allegations actually get any traction, he'll no doubt find Jesus, get baptised by Bear Grylls, and be back for the Christmas book season next year.
I see even Huw Edwards is now angling some sort of comeback. | |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 12:42 - Dec 20 with 762 views | You_Bloo_Right |
| Walliams eh? on 12:06 - Dec 20 by Zx1988 |
And protected by the system as well.
Whoever knew enough to put those 'lone female' rules in place should have refused to work with him, rather than put in place mitigation measures.
Twas ever thus, and ever thus shall be.
Assuming these allegations actually get any traction, he'll no doubt find Jesus, get baptised by Bear Grylls, and be back for the Christmas book season next year.
I see even Huw Edwards is now angling some sort of comeback. |
"Huw Edwards is now angling some sort of comeback".
Bob and Paul have got that corner of the market sewn up, surely? |  |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 12:44 - Dec 20 with 755 views | Swansea_Blue |
Is that sarcasm? I had no idea there were any rumours (naive as heck here). Edit - and also not in the slightest bit interested in ‘celebrities’. [Post edited 20 Dec 12:45]
|  |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 12:45 - Dec 20 with 738 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Walliams eh? on 12:06 - Dec 20 by Zx1988 |
And protected by the system as well.
Whoever knew enough to put those 'lone female' rules in place should have refused to work with him, rather than put in place mitigation measures.
Twas ever thus, and ever thus shall be.
Assuming these allegations actually get any traction, he'll no doubt find Jesus, get baptised by Bear Grylls, and be back for the Christmas book season next year.
I see even Huw Edwards is now angling some sort of comeback. |
I found those mitigations odd myself. Surely there is no obligation to work with him at all if there is that much unease and doubt with working with him.
Walliams has always given me bad vibes if I'm honest and I doubt I am alone. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Walliams eh? on 12:45 - Dec 20 with 736 views | Zx1988 |
| Walliams eh? on 12:44 - Dec 20 by Swansea_Blue |
Is that sarcasm? I had no idea there were any rumours (naive as heck here). Edit - and also not in the slightest bit interested in ‘celebrities’. [Post edited 20 Dec 12:45]
|
Have a squint at the 'Public Image' section of his Wikipedia page. | |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 12:51 - Dec 20 with 705 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Walliams eh? on 12:45 - Dec 20 by Zx1988 |
Have a squint at the 'Public Image' section of his Wikipedia page. |
Blimey. That’s, er, an eye opener. | |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 12:54 - Dec 20 with 692 views | Herbivore |
| Walliams eh? on 09:49 - Dec 20 by wischip |
Computer Says No |
Not just the computer apparently. |  |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 12:56 - Dec 20 with 686 views | Zx1988 |
Explains a lot... | |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 13:07 - Dec 20 with 645 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Walliams eh? on 12:56 - Dec 20 by Zx1988 |
Explains a lot... |
Facks sake. Not good at all if true. Whether or not it is true is anyone’s guess given it’s the Mail. But there’ll no doubt be a lot come out from different sources now his publisher has belatedly made a stand. And maybe even the Mail can be right sometimes! | |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 13:18 - Dec 20 with 615 views | Zx1988 |
| Walliams eh? on 13:07 - Dec 20 by Swansea_Blue |
Facks sake. Not good at all if true. Whether or not it is true is anyone’s guess given it’s the Mail. But there’ll no doubt be a lot come out from different sources now his publisher has belatedly made a stand. And maybe even the Mail can be right sometimes! |
Given the talk of his PR firm and the like, I'd imagine that the Telegraph would have made sure everything was watertight before deciding to publish. | |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 13:21 - Dec 20 with 598 views | Ryorry |
Had no idea. And to think I used to like him ...
 |  |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 13:58 - Dec 20 with 522 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Walliams eh? on 13:18 - Dec 20 by Zx1988 |
Given the talk of his PR firm and the like, I'd imagine that the Telegraph would have made sure everything was watertight before deciding to publish. |
Taking aside the seriousness of the allegations, this does make me chuckle. When the Telegraph ran with their BBC bias investigation many of the people on this thread went with the "Can't believe the Torygraph" line. |  |
| |
| Walliams eh? on 19:27 - Dec 20 with 308 views | Ryorry |
| Walliams eh? on 19:21 - Dec 20 by Swansea_Blue |
Yeah, same. I’ve a couple of his books on the kids’ bookshelves that will be going to a charity shop.
I’m going to hang on to Rolf’s didgeridoo though. It’s what he would have wanted. Badum tish. [Post edited 20 Dec 19:22]
|
The 'I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue' kazoo is much better  [Post edited 20 Dec 19:27]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
