Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Please, let’s not have… 19:41 - Dec 26 with 702 viewsITFC_84

… 30-31 days of January p1ssing around for a makeshift no.9, a 5th choice CM and a reserve team RW. Ashton said we’ve got money to spend and will be active. Let’s be active in the 1st week and not wait until we’re nearly in February before much needed quality reinforcements come through the door.
Surely we’ve identified 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice targets…
2
Please, let’s not have… on 19:46 - Dec 26 with 663 viewsLeoMuff

Unfortunately the standard of striker we want will have options so won’t be rushing into anything.

The only Muff in Town.
Poll: Lamberts rotational policy has left us....

2
Please, let’s not have… on 19:49 - Dec 26 with 629 viewsITFC_84

Please, let’s not have… on 19:46 - Dec 26 by LeoMuff

Unfortunately the standard of striker we want will have options so won’t be rushing into anything.


Let’s hope they’ve been identified, they’ll be contacted on Jan 1st, and will be given a decent wages (+bonuses for promotion). If they don’t agree, move onto next. Surely, we’re an attractive proposition for many?
0
Please, let’s not have… on 19:52 - Dec 26 with 596 viewsWacko

Please, let’s not have… on 19:49 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Let’s hope they’ve been identified, they’ll be contacted on Jan 1st, and will be given a decent wages (+bonuses for promotion). If they don’t agree, move onto next. Surely, we’re an attractive proposition for many?


Forgetting the fact that any decent player in form would need to be replaced by their club

Poll: Who would you rather see lose their job?

1
Please, let’s not have… on 19:52 - Dec 26 with 595 viewsitfcsuth

Nothing for 10 days, few mumblings from fanbase, get one in, then we’ll hear how hard the January market is, everyone is working hard, waiting for PL clubs to move first, competition for players and make a couple of late knee jerk additions late in the window.

Transfer market heritage.
[Post edited 26 Dec 22:14]
2
Please, let’s not have… on 20:13 - Dec 26 with 515 viewsITFC_84

Please, let’s not have… on 19:52 - Dec 26 by Wacko

Forgetting the fact that any decent player in form would need to be replaced by their club


Not our problem. Pay the money, get him in (whoever he is).

Let’s have none of this: “it’s a difficult window.”

We have more money than all other championship clubs and are a much better proposition than almost all of them.
-2
Please, let’s not have… on 20:19 - Dec 26 with 487 viewsblueoutlook

Don’t forget they will need until April to gel, so don’t expect much this season from whoever is signed.
-3
Please, let’s not have… on 20:21 - Dec 26 with 469 viewsBloomBlue

Please, let’s not have… on 20:13 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Not our problem. Pay the money, get him in (whoever he is).

Let’s have none of this: “it’s a difficult window.”

We have more money than all other championship clubs and are a much better proposition than almost all of them.


But what if the players we're interested in are also interesting lower PL teams?
0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:22 - Dec 26 with 463 viewsLeoMuff

Please, let’s not have… on 19:49 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Let’s hope they’ve been identified, they’ll be contacted on Jan 1st, and will be given a decent wages (+bonuses for promotion). If they don’t agree, move onto next. Surely, we’re an attractive proposition for many?


Not sure how many you think there will be ? Probably 1 or 2 at best. We are fishing in a very difficult pond. The premier league will have many of them and the top championship ones will be at another championship club who will be highly unwilling to sell or abroad and have options.

It’s going to be another Keiffer scenario I would think.

The only Muff in Town.
Poll: Lamberts rotational policy has left us....

0
Login to get fewer ads

Please, let’s not have… on 20:25 - Dec 26 with 442 viewsStokieBlue

Please, let’s not have… on 20:19 - Dec 26 by blueoutlook

Don’t forget they will need until April to gel, so don’t expect much this season from whoever is signed.


The relentless negativity must be really tiring.

SB
0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:26 - Dec 26 with 428 viewsBloomBlue

Please, let’s not have… on 20:19 - Dec 26 by blueoutlook

Don’t forget they will need until April to gel, so don’t expect much this season from whoever is signed.


Another closet Norwich fan
0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:27 - Dec 26 with 425 viewsIllinoisblue

Please, let’s not have… on 20:13 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Not our problem. Pay the money, get him in (whoever he is).

Let’s have none of this: “it’s a difficult window.”

We have more money than all other championship clubs and are a much better proposition than almost all of them.


I agree with your general points but to say “it’s not our problem” is rather simplistic. You can’t make a club sell a player Jan 1st just because we need them in urgently. They may not get a replacement until Jan 27th. Or not at all.

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:29 - Dec 26 with 392 viewsStokieBlue

Please, let’s not have… on 20:13 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Not our problem. Pay the money, get him in (whoever he is).

Let’s have none of this: “it’s a difficult window.”

We have more money than all other championship clubs and are a much better proposition than almost all of them.


What a load of nonsense.

Selling teams are under no obligation to sell on our terms or timescales regardless of the funds we have.

SB
0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:35 - Dec 26 with 343 viewsHerbivore

In this week's episode of Real life is not like Football Manager......

Poll: Latest TWTD opinion poll - who are you voting for?
Blog: Where Did It All Go Wrong for Paul Hurst?

0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:35 - Dec 26 with 340 viewsJ2BLUE

Please, let’s not have… on 20:25 - Dec 26 by StokieBlue

The relentless negativity must be really tiring.

SB


Surely with that username they are just playing a character? Which would be even more odd...

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:36 - Dec 26 with 327 viewstcblue

Please, let’s not have… on 20:13 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Not our problem. Pay the money, get him in (whoever he is).

Let’s have none of this: “it’s a difficult window.”

We have more money than all other championship clubs and are a much better proposition than almost all of them.


Then the realistic shopping window is Championship level.

Which is fine, but as a fan base we should appreciate that it'll be incredibly tough to convince a higher league level player to come (unless perhaps on a loan) - no PL (for example) club will sell themselves short, nor do any player contracts expire in January.

This is all the hangover for being slow and not getting the striker business done early enough in the summer. "It's a difficult window" is multiple times more apt for January.

In Ashton we trust, etc
0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:40 - Dec 26 with 293 viewsSwansea_Blue

Please, let’s not have… on 20:13 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Not our problem. Pay the money, get him in (whoever he is).

Let’s have none of this: “it’s a difficult window.”

We have more money than all other championship clubs and are a much better proposition than almost all of them.


And this is why we’ll end up having threads criticising the club for not getting in a top quality striker in the first week. If it was easy, we’d always have all our first pick signings in the door at the start of the window. But we’re competing with other clubs, we’re competing with agents who are hawking their players around, and we’re having to take into account the demands of the selling club who may refuse an approach until they have a replacement lined up. We’re not the only club in the process unfortunately.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Please, let’s not have… on 20:52 - Dec 26 with 204 viewslazyblue

Please, let’s not have… on 19:49 - Dec 26 by ITFC_84

Let’s hope they’ve been identified, they’ll be contacted on Jan 1st, and will be given a decent wages (+bonuses for promotion). If they don’t agree, move onto next. Surely, we’re an attractive proposition for many?


One of them has
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025