| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 14:02 - Feb 8 with 472 views | J2BLUE |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 14:00 - Feb 8 by chicoazul |
5-6 years is hopelessly optimistic, or pessimistic if you prefer. Stick a zero on the end of both maybe. |
Very much doubt that. It's getting better and better, fast and faster. |  | |  |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 14:22 - Feb 8 with 405 views | giant_stow |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 10:08 - Feb 8 by Herbivore |
This is daft. People who don't have kids already subsidise those that do, their taxes pay for schools, health care,.and things like child benefits and tax credit. Why should they pay even more when they take less out? |
That arguement is vaguely reminiscent of what some rich bods say about healthcare / public services. |  |
| |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 14:55 - Feb 8 with 350 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 19:33 - Feb 7 by EddyJ |
People who can't have children will be a small minority of those that don't.
As others have said, its not significantly different from child benefit or schools being paid for from taxation.
Having children is beneficial to society and expensive. People who don't have children (including those who can't) will not be providing that benefit or receiving that expense. I think it is fair to redistribute wealth to those who need it more. |
F me
What nonsense.
Don't those wanna be fascists bang on about the state getting too involved in people's lives and paying too much tax?
Hypocritical cobblers again from those who want us to be a 1930s Germany copy |  | | |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 14:58 - Feb 8 with 348 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 19:55 - Feb 7 by EddyJ |
I'm far from a Reform spokesperson, but I understand their pollicies are now:
1) Cut general taxation
2) Increase taxation on the child-free
That will mean parents become relatively better off. It is exactly the policy you seem to want. |
Not that far | | | |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 15:14 - Feb 8 with 307 views | Herbivore |
| Reform candidate says you should be taxed more for not having children on 14:22 - Feb 8 by giant_stow |
That arguement is vaguely reminiscent of what some rich bods say about healthcare / public services. |
Think that's a bit of a false equivalence. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
