| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ 13:13 - Feb 9 with 4336 views | ElderGrizzly |
Massie, who is behind the Epstein Transparency Act, has threatened the DoJ he will read out the unredacted names of all those communicating with Epstein in the files.
He has ‘privilege’ due to how Congress works (a bit how Parliament is here)
Also Maxwell is in a hearing soon, but is likely to ‘plead the 5th’ to all questions. [Post edited 9 Feb 13:13]
|  | | |  |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 17:27 - Feb 9 with 1039 views | Blueschev |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 16:38 - Feb 9 by ElderGrizzly |
They’ve said exactly that |
So there's been a huge sex scandal involving rich, powerful men spanning decades, and the sole conviction is that of a woman? What a world. |  | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 18:38 - Feb 9 with 969 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 17:27 - Feb 9 by Blueschev |
So there's been a huge sex scandal involving rich, powerful men spanning decades, and the sole conviction is that of a woman? What a world. |
The side-effects of so many powerful men being involved. Mutual self-destruction is never going to happen | | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 20:00 - Feb 9 with 909 views | ElderGrizzly |
The death is looking more and more suss
| | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 20:00 - Feb 9 with 904 views | Dubtractor |
Saw that a few minutes ago - apparently its an old clip. |  |
| |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 20:04 - Feb 9 with 889 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 20:00 - Feb 9 by Dubtractor |
Saw that a few minutes ago - apparently its an old clip. |
They’re busy ensuring Bannon’s compliance/silence
| | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 20:37 - Feb 9 with 825 views | eirannach_gorm |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 20:00 - Feb 9 by ElderGrizzly |
The death is looking more and more suss
|
I thought the camera stopped working  |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 00:41 - Feb 10 with 696 views | WicklowBlue |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 23:22 - Feb 9 by ElderGrizzly |
Maybe the camera redacted these 6 people too
[Post edited 9 Feb 23:32]
|
Well lets see how redacting the redaction's goes...
RTE news : Unredacted Epstein files opened to US politicians
http://www.rte.ie/news/us/2026 [Post edited 10 Feb 1:00]
|  | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 11:07 - Feb 10 with 557 views | leitrimblue |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 00:41 - Feb 10 by WicklowBlue |
Well lets see how redacting the redaction's goes...
RTE news : Unredacted Epstein files opened to US politicians
http://www.rte.ie/news/us/2026 [Post edited 10 Feb 1:00]
|
Holly feck, their talking about trafficking and abusing 9 year old girls!
How are these scumbags not facing justice? |  | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 12:28 - Feb 10 with 498 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 11:07 - Feb 10 by leitrimblue |
Holly feck, their talking about trafficking and abusing 9 year old girls!
How are these scumbags not facing justice? |
It's unthinkable isn't it. It's also not going to go away. |  |
| |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 12:35 - Feb 10 with 478 views | leitrimblue |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 12:28 - Feb 10 by GlasgowBlue |
It's unthinkable isn't it. It's also not going to go away. |
It is indeed. Did you read the 2 sentences in the rte piece referring to the 9 year old girl?
Not gonna repeat um as their so feck1n disturbing, but really gives a tiny glimpse into the sick minds of those involved | | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 13:04 - Feb 10 with 434 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 12:35 - Feb 10 by leitrimblue |
It is indeed. Did you read the 2 sentences in the rte piece referring to the 9 year old girl?
Not gonna repeat um as their so feck1n disturbing, but really gives a tiny glimpse into the sick minds of those involved |
Unfortunately I did. Maxwell cannot be allowed to do any deal at all. She is as bad as Epstein. Even worse as a woman. | |
| |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 13:25 - Feb 10 with 396 views | Pinewoodblue |
It looks as if a lot of files are still being held back. Can’t believe no evidence has surfaced showing who Epstein shared the sensitive information gathered from Andrew & Mandelson with. |  |
| |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 13:32 - Feb 10 with 360 views | LeoMuff |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 12:28 - Feb 10 by GlasgowBlue |
It's unthinkable isn't it. It's also not going to go away. |
Another Saville I would think, once those in power have passed on the truth comes out.
I don’t get how Maxwell has been upgraded to a cushy prison yet won’t testify ? |  |
| |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 13:55 - Feb 10 with 303 views | soupytwist |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 13:32 - Feb 10 by LeoMuff |
Another Saville I would think, once those in power have passed on the truth comes out.
I don’t get how Maxwell has been upgraded to a cushy prison yet won’t testify ? |
Presumably in testifying she thinks she will incriminate herself as complicit in what happened to enable the abuse, and therefore expose herself to further charges and punishment. While names are redacted there's not enough evidence unless she provides it.
And she has the leverage of demanding immunity from Trump in exchange for not mentioning anything about him which, of course, may be because he wasn't involved.
She was moved to the cushy prison after speaking in prison to Trump's ex-personal lawyer who is now US Deputy Attorney General. I'm sure that was an entirely above board conversation where no kind of quid pro quo was discussed. |  | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 14:11 - Feb 10 with 262 views | DJR |
So long as this drags on and gets worse, it is difficult to think that Starmer can ever extricate himself from appointing someone so closely linked with Epstein.
And the fact that he appointed someone "intensely relaxed" about the filthy rich will no doubt also be cutting through with the many struggling with the cost of living.
This BTL comment struck me as quite pertinent, and it is clear to me that Starmer would no longer be in post were he a mere minister.
"Boris Johnson, famous for his childish behaviour and for having no decency whatsoever resigns when he wrongheadedly appoints Chris Pincher Deputy Chief Whip.
Kier Starmer, who calls himself an adult in the room and people refer to as decent doubles down and refuses to resign after wrongheadedly appointing Peter Mandelson in what is probably the biggest political scandal in British History.
Anyone see the problem here?" [Post edited 10 Feb 14:14]
|  | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 14:17 - Feb 10 with 238 views | nrb1985 |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 14:11 - Feb 10 by DJR |
So long as this drags on and gets worse, it is difficult to think that Starmer can ever extricate himself from appointing someone so closely linked with Epstein.
And the fact that he appointed someone "intensely relaxed" about the filthy rich will no doubt also be cutting through with the many struggling with the cost of living.
This BTL comment struck me as quite pertinent, and it is clear to me that Starmer would no longer be in post were he a mere minister.
"Boris Johnson, famous for his childish behaviour and for having no decency whatsoever resigns when he wrongheadedly appoints Chris Pincher Deputy Chief Whip.
Kier Starmer, who calls himself an adult in the room and people refer to as decent doubles down and refuses to resign after wrongheadedly appointing Peter Mandelson in what is probably the biggest political scandal in British History.
Anyone see the problem here?" [Post edited 10 Feb 14:14]
|
To your last point about Pincher though, wasn't that rather the straw that broke the camel's back rather than being the explicit issue that caused him to step down?
This obviously followed party gate and various other indiscretions - which were a clear pattern.
Whatever you or I think of Starmer, I believe he's a good man trying to do an honest job. I don't think you could ever have said that about Johnson - who was and is a c@nt. | | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 14:19 - Feb 10 with 233 views | wischip |
Files are going to be selectively drip fed for years, maybe decades to come. No one else will go to prison. When everyone involved has died of natural causes someone will say "Lessons will be learned. As far as we are concerned, that is the end of the matter and the case is closed, we will now move on". |  | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:18 - Feb 10 with 160 views | Camul123 |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 14:11 - Feb 10 by DJR |
So long as this drags on and gets worse, it is difficult to think that Starmer can ever extricate himself from appointing someone so closely linked with Epstein.
And the fact that he appointed someone "intensely relaxed" about the filthy rich will no doubt also be cutting through with the many struggling with the cost of living.
This BTL comment struck me as quite pertinent, and it is clear to me that Starmer would no longer be in post were he a mere minister.
"Boris Johnson, famous for his childish behaviour and for having no decency whatsoever resigns when he wrongheadedly appoints Chris Pincher Deputy Chief Whip.
Kier Starmer, who calls himself an adult in the room and people refer to as decent doubles down and refuses to resign after wrongheadedly appointing Peter Mandelson in what is probably the biggest political scandal in British History.
Anyone see the problem here?" [Post edited 10 Feb 14:14]
|
Johnson resigned because eventually everyone refused to work with him.
It was always a matter of time. | | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:22 - Feb 10 with 149 views | DJR |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 14:17 - Feb 10 by nrb1985 |
To your last point about Pincher though, wasn't that rather the straw that broke the camel's back rather than being the explicit issue that caused him to step down?
This obviously followed party gate and various other indiscretions - which were a clear pattern.
Whatever you or I think of Starmer, I believe he's a good man trying to do an honest job. I don't think you could ever have said that about Johnson - who was and is a c@nt. |
Yes, the parallels aren't exactly the same but he did come to power on a promise to be whiter than white and, coupled with his numerous mis-steps, it could be said that the camel's back has been broken by the latest disaster.
It is certainly difficult to see his or the Labour Party's poll ratings improving with him in charge and I can't really see him surviving for much longer.
I do feel sorry for him because he is said to be devastated by what happened but maybe he was never really cut out for politics and didn't have the sort of political nous that saw dangers in appointing Mandelson. [Post edited 10 Feb 15:28]
| | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:23 - Feb 10 with 150 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 14:11 - Feb 10 by DJR |
So long as this drags on and gets worse, it is difficult to think that Starmer can ever extricate himself from appointing someone so closely linked with Epstein.
And the fact that he appointed someone "intensely relaxed" about the filthy rich will no doubt also be cutting through with the many struggling with the cost of living.
This BTL comment struck me as quite pertinent, and it is clear to me that Starmer would no longer be in post were he a mere minister.
"Boris Johnson, famous for his childish behaviour and for having no decency whatsoever resigns when he wrongheadedly appoints Chris Pincher Deputy Chief Whip.
Kier Starmer, who calls himself an adult in the room and people refer to as decent doubles down and refuses to resign after wrongheadedly appointing Peter Mandelson in what is probably the biggest political scandal in British History.
Anyone see the problem here?" [Post edited 10 Feb 14:14]
|
I think this excerpt for the Cabinet Office officials due diligence report damages Starmer's credibility.
Including that Mandelson:
- Had been friends w Epstein since at least 2002 and discussed personal and business life with him
- Stayed at Epstein's NY home while he was in prison for child sex offences
- Was a senior figure in a conservation charity run by Ghislaine Maxwell
- Celebrated a birthday at Epstein’s Paris apartment after the financier had been charged with soliciting a woman for prostitution
- Was referred to as "Petie" in emails sent by Epstein years after his conviction
- Went shopping for belts in an infamous photo from St Barts | |
| |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:32 - Feb 10 with 133 views | DJR |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:23 - Feb 10 by GlasgowBlue |
I think this excerpt for the Cabinet Office officials due diligence report damages Starmer's credibility.
Including that Mandelson:
- Had been friends w Epstein since at least 2002 and discussed personal and business life with him
- Stayed at Epstein's NY home while he was in prison for child sex offences
- Was a senior figure in a conservation charity run by Ghislaine Maxwell
- Celebrated a birthday at Epstein’s Paris apartment after the financier had been charged with soliciting a woman for prostitution
- Was referred to as "Petie" in emails sent by Epstein years after his conviction
- Went shopping for belts in an infamous photo from St Barts |
A lawyer having seen that should have run a mile (and I say that as a lawyer, part of a profession noted for its caution and standards of integrity).
And presumably much more will emerge as more information is released.
They are no longer in control (as they had hoped to be) of what will emerge and effectively it seems to me to be death by a thousand cuts. [Post edited 10 Feb 15:35]
| | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:45 - Feb 10 with 89 views | eirannach_gorm |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 13:32 - Feb 10 by LeoMuff |
Another Saville I would think, once those in power have passed on the truth comes out.
I don’t get how Maxwell has been upgraded to a cushy prison yet won’t testify ? |
Thats the reason she won't testify. If she gets immunity, her testimony won't have any mention of Trump or any Republican supporting sleezebags involvement. | | | |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:46 - Feb 10 with 84 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Epstein files could be about to go ‘nuclear’ on 15:23 - Feb 10 by GlasgowBlue |
I think this excerpt for the Cabinet Office officials due diligence report damages Starmer's credibility.
Including that Mandelson:
- Had been friends w Epstein since at least 2002 and discussed personal and business life with him
- Stayed at Epstein's NY home while he was in prison for child sex offences
- Was a senior figure in a conservation charity run by Ghislaine Maxwell
- Celebrated a birthday at Epstein’s Paris apartment after the financier had been charged with soliciting a woman for prostitution
- Was referred to as "Petie" in emails sent by Epstein years after his conviction
- Went shopping for belts in an infamous photo from St Barts |
Isn’t Starmer’s line on all this, that Mandelson lied repeatedly about these things.
So incompetence or naivety on his or his ‘vetting’ peoples part, but not intentionally appointed knowing these things | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
