| Time to get rid of that rule now ? 19:27 - May 19 with 854 views | Perublue |
Obviously there is a rule which has been broken and Southampton will be rightly punished but I wonder if it should be dropped now or asap the rule not the punishment ?
I’ve got no problem with teams spying on each other to gain any advantage they can, it’s not like it doesn’t happen all the time in some form or another anyway be it reading notes goal keepers have on their bottles in penalty shootouts or an ex player passing on their knowledge to their new teammates.
It’s opening a huge can of uncontrollable worms which could send clubs into constant court appearance’s and is it really necessary.. if anything well done on using your initiative.
|  |
| |  |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:29 - May 19 with 798 views | bartyg |
eh?? |  |
| |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:29 - May 19 with 799 views | SouperJim |
Why get rid of the rule now there is a precedent on what happens if you break it? They've put down a marker which should be all the deterrent needed. |  |
| |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:29 - May 19 with 789 views | J2BLUE |
No, the punishment will end any chance of it happening again. You don't change the rules to enable cheats. |  | | |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:30 - May 19 with 765 views | Perublue |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:29 - May 19 by J2BLUE |
No, the punishment will end any chance of it happening again. You don't change the rules to enable cheats. |
I think that’s my point..should there have been a rule anyway ? | |
| |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:36 - May 19 with 713 views | Guthrum |
It's a very specific rule about not observing training in the 72 hours before a match. None of those other things come into it. |  |
| |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:48 - May 19 with 605 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:29 - May 19 by SouperJim |
Why get rid of the rule now there is a precedent on what happens if you break it? They've put down a marker which should be all the deterrent needed. |
Looking forward to a clever team finding lookalikes for a rival clubs staff, and then sending them to ‘spy’ on opposition teams in the run up to matches |  |
| |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:48 - May 19 with 597 views | J2BLUE |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 19:30 - May 19 by Perublue |
I think that’s my point..should there have been a rule anyway ? |
Yes | | | |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 21:47 - May 19 with 412 views | Olcol |
They obviously believe they got an advantage otherwise they would not have done it.
Every tiny detail is analysed, for a championship team to get to the premier league and the £ 110 million pay check. Most games are won or lost on very small margins.
Why on earth would you want the rule changed???? |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 21:50 - May 19 with 375 views | Dubtractor |
What a bizarre take. |  |
| |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 21:53 - May 19 with 351 views | bournemouthblue |
It amuses me how low tech Southampton's approach was
It's clearly been going on for a while, I assume Boro just confirmed earlier suspicions |  |
| |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 21:54 - May 19 with 341 views | bournemouthblue |
| Time to get rid of that rule now ? on 21:47 - May 19 by Olcol |
They obviously believe they got an advantage otherwise they would not have done it.
Every tiny detail is analysed, for a championship team to get to the premier league and the £ 110 million pay check. Most games are won or lost on very small margins.
Why on earth would you want the rule changed???? |
Very little detail put towards not getting caught though, as far as we are aware any way | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
