Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Early thoughts for Saturday 08:30 - Sep 8 with 1874 viewsIPSWICHFANITFC

I wonder if we will see a slight formation change on Saturday. Palace play a 3-4-2-1 with 3 CB's who want a physical battle and create a box 4 to outnumber in midfield with the two 10's and two 8's.

Thinking back to GON pre match presser against Liverpool, toying with the idea of going with Enciso as a false 9. I wonder if we go with that this weekend to disjoint their back 3.

The central CB in the 3 (Disasi) will want a big striker to play against to be aggressive, have physical contact with and duel, but with a false 9 like Enciso, will he want to be dragged out of their defensive shape and follow his movement deeper?

I would also bring Ouattara in to provide some extra legs in midfield to help cover ground on the wider areas. We haven't seen a lot from him, but what has stood out to me is that he is dynamic, athletic and can provide legs in midfield.

Scherpen
O'Shea Diop Greaves Davis
Ouattara Lukic Palacios
Fatawu Enciso Maeda

Something like this maybe. It would enable us to gain more control in the match, and if we needed to adapt formation and switch to a back 3 ourselves, then we could with the personnel on the pitch.

Poll: If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt?

0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 08:34 - Sep 8 with 1838 viewsBacktoblue78A

Please not Greaves again. Not fair on him or the fans
-13
Early thoughts for Saturday on 08:47 - Sep 8 with 1789 viewsGuthrum

Tho if they are playing that kind of formation, it will reduce the threat on our goal (with only three attackers). So what we will need is more width to play around their midfield and put shots in from wide, with followers-up for the rebounds.

Going defensive will only match their negativity and risk a stalemate, when we could otherwise pepper their goal and get a win.

Edit: Giving Disasi his big, physical forward to play against, Emersonn, will take him out of the game, leaving our other attackers with just the two to play against. Plus the Brazillian might win the battle - the Palace player has to prevail every time, our no.9 only once and the ball could be in the net.
[Post edited 8 Sep 8:57]

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

1
Early thoughts for Saturday on 08:52 - Sep 8 with 1757 viewshomer_123

Early thoughts for Saturday on 08:34 - Sep 8 by Backtoblue78A

Please not Greaves again. Not fair on him or the fans


Good morning you little ray of sunshine!

Ade Akinbiyi couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo...
Poll: Has Omari travelled?

3
Early thoughts for Saturday on 09:14 - Sep 8 with 1661 viewsIPSWICHFANITFC

Early thoughts for Saturday on 08:47 - Sep 8 by Guthrum

Tho if they are playing that kind of formation, it will reduce the threat on our goal (with only three attackers). So what we will need is more width to play around their midfield and put shots in from wide, with followers-up for the rebounds.

Going defensive will only match their negativity and risk a stalemate, when we could otherwise pepper their goal and get a win.

Edit: Giving Disasi his big, physical forward to play against, Emersonn, will take him out of the game, leaving our other attackers with just the two to play against. Plus the Brazillian might win the battle - the Palace player has to prevail every time, our no.9 only once and the ball could be in the net.
[Post edited 8 Sep 8:57]


There's two ways of looking at it, in possession and out of possession.

In possession, I would disagree that it is defensive and matching their negativity. It can be an effective style provided the front 3 offer variations of movement. Enciso is intelligent and would find space to receive the ball. Maeda would need to give them something to think about in behind and Fatawu can go 1v1 effectively. Defensive units in a back 3 do not want to be moved about, they want to remain in their comfort zone within their structure. Can we make them uncomfortable or play into their hands?

Out of possession, you narrow off central passing lanes and force them to play wide. Remain compact in our shape by covering that side of the pitch the ball is in and let their centre backs try and find the forward passes. I'm sure they would give it away more often than not or play longer as they are not good enough to break a compact shape down in my opinion. Also, the less Adam Wharton sees of the ball, the better it is for us.

With Flemming and Emersonn on the bench, we have two options to change momentum if it is going against us.

I also think back to Friday. Van Dijk and Jacquet were brilliant at winning duels. Palace back 3 are similar profiles in the sense that they welcome the duels. Everton's CB pairing will be the same. They are big physical monsters who want to head it, kick it and kick you, but you play into their hands if you give them that target man to do so.

Poll: If selling Jackson meant getting in a wide man, would you be happy with Garbutt?

0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 09:33 - Sep 8 with 1583 viewsGarv

I am increasingly of the opinion our captain and player of the year last season should be in the middle of defence. Not to say Greaves has been particularly poor, but he's just not as good a defender. Comes with risk due to the right/left balance, but it's a worth it, especially somewhere we're not likely to be playing free flowing football out from the back.

I also think Ouattara can only have been signed with the idea of him playing right back eventually in mind. He's not going to get many midfield minutes at all once everyone is fit, and he won't play left back.

Sherpen
Ouattara O'Shea Diop Davis
Palacios Lukic
Fatawu Enciso Maeda
Emersonn/Flemming

Poll: If forced to sell one of the following this summer, who would you sell?

2
Early thoughts for Saturday on 10:07 - Sep 8 with 1446 viewsDennyx4

If we are to change formation, think I would go 532, with Ouattarra (sic) and Davis as wing backs.

Bring Nunez into midfield, he covers a lot of ground , as well as being comfortable on the ball, with Emersonn and Enciso as a front two, Enciso almost has a free role to drop deeper, go left or right.

Scherpen
Ouattarra, O Shea, Diop, Greaves, Davis
Lukic, Palacios, Nunez,
Enciso Emersonn

Would allow you to bring Fatawu and Maeda off the bench to change formation if needed.

Gives us a lot more protection in central areas, 3 centre half’s and 3 central midfielders.
1
Early thoughts for Saturday on 10:19 - Sep 8 with 1404 viewsBluemike31

I believe that Flemming will definitely start Saturday, whatever the formation may be.
2
Early thoughts for Saturday on 10:43 - Sep 8 with 1313 viewshomer_123

I'd just keep closing the game and re-starting until we won.

Ade Akinbiyi couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo...
Poll: Has Omari travelled?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Early thoughts for Saturday on 12:42 - Sep 8 with 1146 viewsbarcelonablue2

All 3 Palace goals last week against Fulham came from their wing/ fullbacks.

Also noticeable in the city game was that was Kamada is closed down and can't pass back to Wharton he lost the ball. A lot. In fact when Wharton is closed off they really really struggle to advance whatsoever now without Munoz. Khalili looks decent but certainly not found his legs like his predecessor to any extent yet.

If i am GON i go 5 at the back with Outarra on the right and tell him or Davis to invert when the fullbacks are not forward. I put Enciso/ Maeda as a man marker on Wharton and force him to pass backwards or more quickly forwards. I tell Greaves to man mark the striker and DOS/ DIOP to clear the back lines. Then go Palacios Lukic mid and Flemming up top.

As proven by their previous games Palace do not really care if you get the ball out wide but they are so slow at dealing with smart passing in the centre of the pitch. Palacios/ Lukic/ Enciso are all capable of doing that and Flemming is a good striker at finding space for through balls.
5
Early thoughts for Saturday on 12:53 - Sep 8 with 1101 viewsParky

Palace’s defence is absolutely rubbish, let’s get at them I say. I’d love to see Flemming and Emersonn play together. Something like:

Scherpen

DOS
Diop
Greaves
Davis

Palacios
Lukic

Fatawu
Enciso

Flemming
Emersonn
0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 15:06 - Sep 8 with 902 viewsbilllm

Early thoughts for Saturday on 09:33 - Sep 8 by Garv

I am increasingly of the opinion our captain and player of the year last season should be in the middle of defence. Not to say Greaves has been particularly poor, but he's just not as good a defender. Comes with risk due to the right/left balance, but it's a worth it, especially somewhere we're not likely to be playing free flowing football out from the back.

I also think Ouattara can only have been signed with the idea of him playing right back eventually in mind. He's not going to get many midfield minutes at all once everyone is fit, and he won't play left back.

Sherpen
Ouattara O'Shea Diop Davis
Palacios Lukic
Fatawu Enciso Maeda
Emersonn/Flemming


Bang there you go,
0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 15:08 - Sep 8 with 902 viewsbilllm

Early thoughts for Saturday on 09:33 - Sep 8 by Garv

I am increasingly of the opinion our captain and player of the year last season should be in the middle of defence. Not to say Greaves has been particularly poor, but he's just not as good a defender. Comes with risk due to the right/left balance, but it's a worth it, especially somewhere we're not likely to be playing free flowing football out from the back.

I also think Ouattara can only have been signed with the idea of him playing right back eventually in mind. He's not going to get many midfield minutes at all once everyone is fit, and he won't play left back.

Sherpen
Ouattara O'Shea Diop Davis
Palacios Lukic
Fatawu Enciso Maeda
Emersonn/Flemming


Bang there you go,
0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 15:23 - Sep 8 with 864 viewsBseaBlue

Scherpen
Fatawu O'Shea Diop Greaves Davis
Lukic Palacios Ouattara
Enciso
Flemming

5-3-2 (Fatawu and Davis wing backs) with Enciso to have more of a free role behind Flemming. A midfield three to give us more control and Palacios less of the physical stuff to worry about, in hope he dictates the game.

Hybrid formation with Leif dropping back into a back 4 with Dara acting as a secondary right back if Fatawu pushes forward.
[Post edited 8 Sep 15:24]
0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 15:43 - Sep 8 with 800 viewsTRUE_BLUE123

Do not let Adam Wharton run the game.

Poll: Will Paul Lambert be Ipswich Town manager on the final day of this season ?

0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 16:01 - Sep 8 with 752 viewsjonny1964

i would like to see Furlong right back and dara in the centre with diop. and maybe jack clarke for maeda?
0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 16:18 - Sep 8 with 726 viewsmuccletonjoe

Early thoughts for Saturday on 15:43 - Sep 8 by TRUE_BLUE123

Do not let Adam Wharton run the game.


My worry , is he will do exactly that, with 2 players in there , neither are combative.
0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 17:31 - Sep 8 with 601 viewsBlueBadger

Early thoughts for Saturday on 08:34 - Sep 8 by Backtoblue78A

Please not Greaves again. Not fair on him or the fans


Hope it's not been too rainy in Norfolk today

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: How did you do the England game?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 18:57 - Sep 8 with 487 viewsTRUE_BLUE123

Early thoughts for Saturday on 16:18 - Sep 8 by muccletonjoe

My worry , is he will do exactly that, with 2 players in there , neither are combative.


Palacios is combative.

Poll: Will Paul Lambert be Ipswich Town manager on the final day of this season ?

0
Early thoughts for Saturday on 19:38 - Sep 8 with 432 viewsjas0999

Early thoughts for Saturday on 08:34 - Sep 8 by Backtoblue78A

Please not Greaves again. Not fair on him or the fans


Who replaces him? Kipre?

No no. Greaves to start.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026