| Yellow and FK 21:11 - Oct 23 with 718 views | Zx1988 |
Can those be retrospectively awarded by VAR? |  |
| Not a prophet, or a stone-age man; just a mortal with potential of a superman. | | Poll: | Worst Ginger? |
| |  |
| Yellow and FK on 21:12 - Oct 23 with 702 views | J2BLUE |
No idea but I happily accept it!
Thought he was gone. |  | | |
| Yellow and FK on 21:12 - Oct 23 with 683 views | FrimleyBlue |
Never seen that before |  |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 21:14 - Oct 23 with 645 views | Mullet |
Also baffling it was only reviewed when Forest demanded it seemingly. O’Shea walks off with half a shirt and Delap gets nothing too.
Makes no sense |  |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 21:15 - Oct 23 with 619 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Neither can. They are making it up as they go. |  |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 21:17 - Oct 23 with 571 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Yellow and FK on 21:12 - Oct 23 by J2BLUE |
No idea but I happily accept it!
Thought he was gone. |
Clearly VAR thought it was a clear and obvious error from the ref so two officials thought so.
However, it was clear it was never a clear goalscoring opportunity so the on-field ref was right until he gave the free kick and yellow card which he is not allowed to do!
Re-refereeing the game because VAR got it wrong. | |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 21:18 - Oct 23 with 562 views | Zx1988 |
| Yellow and FK on 21:15 - Oct 23 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Neither can. They are making it up as they go. |
IFAB suggests otherwise:
https://www.theifab.com/laws/2
Every day's a school day! | |
| Not a prophet, or a stone-age man; just a mortal with potential of a superman. | | Poll: | Worst Ginger? |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 21:19 - Oct 23 with 539 views | FrimleyBlue |
But what about giving a freekick | |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 21:22 - Oct 23 with 510 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
If that was why it was reviewed, OK. Did VAR really think that was a red card for violent conduct? They appeared to be reviewing for denial of a goalscoring opportunity. But I expect they are now allowed to re-referee that. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Yellow and FK on 21:23 - Oct 23 with 502 views | Blue_Uprising |
| Yellow and FK on 21:22 - Oct 23 by Nthsuffolkblue |
If that was why it was reviewed, OK. Did VAR really think that was a red card for violent conduct? They appeared to be reviewing for denial of a goalscoring opportunity. But I expect they are now allowed to re-referee that. |
If the referee completely misses a foul or gives no card at all, and VAR sends them to the monitor to review a potential direct red card, the referee has the authority to award a yellow card and a free kick/penalty after looking at the screen.
According to IFAB protocol:
• The Trigger: VAR can only prompt an on-field monitor review if they believe a "clear and obvious" direct red card offense occurred (or a penalty/goal incident). They cannot call a review just for a missed yellow card.
• The Review Process: Once the referee is at the pitch-side monitor, they are reviewing the entire context of that specific incident.
• The Final Decision: The referee has full authority over the final outcome. If they look at the replays and conclude, "It wasn't quite severe enough for a direct red card, but it definitely was a reckless foul," they can issue a yellow card and restart play with a free kick (or a penalty, if it happened inside the box). |  | | |
| Yellow and FK on 21:24 - Oct 23 with 494 views | Zx1988 |
| Yellow and FK on 21:19 - Oct 23 by FrimleyBlue |
But what about giving a freekick |
This bit seems to cover it:
As for the other query, I assume that the 'dangerous conduct' example is the most common/obvious scenario. I can see how it would equally apply to a possible DOGSO in that both incidents would raise the possibility of a red card. | |
| Not a prophet, or a stone-age man; just a mortal with potential of a superman. | | Poll: | Worst Ginger? |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 21:24 - Oct 23 with 494 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Yellow and FK on 21:23 - Oct 23 by Blue_Uprising |
If the referee completely misses a foul or gives no card at all, and VAR sends them to the monitor to review a potential direct red card, the referee has the authority to award a yellow card and a free kick/penalty after looking at the screen.
According to IFAB protocol:
• The Trigger: VAR can only prompt an on-field monitor review if they believe a "clear and obvious" direct red card offense occurred (or a penalty/goal incident). They cannot call a review just for a missed yellow card.
• The Review Process: Once the referee is at the pitch-side monitor, they are reviewing the entire context of that specific incident.
• The Final Decision: The referee has full authority over the final outcome. If they look at the replays and conclude, "It wasn't quite severe enough for a direct red card, but it definitely was a reckless foul," they can issue a yellow card and restart play with a free kick (or a penalty, if it happened inside the box). |
It's the trigger where it went wrong.
How did VAR decide it was a clear and obvious red card?
Well done to the ref for actually looking at the incident and pointing out they were wrong. | |
| |
| Yellow and FK on 22:38 - Oct 23 with 278 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Yellow and FK on 21:23 - Oct 23 by Blue_Uprising |
If the referee completely misses a foul or gives no card at all, and VAR sends them to the monitor to review a potential direct red card, the referee has the authority to award a yellow card and a free kick/penalty after looking at the screen.
According to IFAB protocol:
• The Trigger: VAR can only prompt an on-field monitor review if they believe a "clear and obvious" direct red card offense occurred (or a penalty/goal incident). They cannot call a review just for a missed yellow card.
• The Review Process: Once the referee is at the pitch-side monitor, they are reviewing the entire context of that specific incident.
• The Final Decision: The referee has full authority over the final outcome. If they look at the replays and conclude, "It wasn't quite severe enough for a direct red card, but it definitely was a reckless foul," they can issue a yellow card and restart play with a free kick (or a penalty, if it happened inside the box). |
Since a fee kick was given have to assume ref didn’t, in real time, regard it as a foul. VAR does not authority to award a free kick. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
