VAR Controversy no 100000000 14:28 - Oct 17 with 1019 views | StochesStotasBlewe | How the hell did they determine Mane was offside. Disgraceful. Clearly onside. Feckin joke. |  |
| We have no village green, or a shop.
It's very, very quiet.
I can walk to the pub. |
| |  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:33 - Oct 17 with 976 views | noggin | Ask Fishers, he's better than VAR. |  |
|  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:36 - Oct 17 with 953 views | StochesStotasBlewe |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:33 - Oct 17 by noggin | Ask Fishers, he's better than VAR. |
Indeed. |  |
| We have no village green, or a shop.
It's very, very quiet.
I can walk to the pub. |
|  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:40 - Oct 17 with 933 views | You_Bloo_Right | Now come along, be fair. The VAR referee has used footage from a not in line camera filming at about 30 frames per second (i.e. within the range but not at the upper limit of the reception rate of the human eye) and fed this through a computer system to draw a, by definition, arbitrary line on a football pitch at an equally arbitrary moment in time to prove that Mane was an inch offside. Offside is offside, apparently. |  |
|  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:41 - Oct 17 with 922 views | Wickets | And add to that how did Pickford stay on the pitch ? |  | |  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:41 - Oct 17 with 916 views | tiptreeblue | Aaaaarrrrggggghahahahahahah |  | |  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:43 - Oct 17 with 902 views | RobTheMonk |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:41 - Oct 17 by Wickets | And add to that how did Pickford stay on the pitch ? |
Haha it was literally the worst tackle I've seen for quite some time. I'm actually laughing at how nothing was done. Complete fluke that Van Dijk didn't break a leg there. |  | |  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:59 - Oct 17 with 845 views | ITFC_Forever | Not offside in a million years... the only part of him that is possibly not level or worse is his arm, which you can’t score with anyway. |  |
|  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 15:07 - Oct 17 with 827 views | rickw | They can't/won't say anything is level anymore even if it means spending 4 minutes to find a 1mm difference. I would change the rule so if they can't tell with just 1 line then it's level |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 15:08 - Oct 17 with 820 views | Ftnfwest |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:41 - Oct 17 by Wickets | And add to that how did Pickford stay on the pitch ? |
Offside and dead ball at that point apparently. Yes I think it’s mad as well. Especially when you consider what was given as a penalty against walker the other night. |  | |  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 15:14 - Oct 17 with 798 views | Radlett_blue |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 15:08 - Oct 17 by Ftnfwest | Offside and dead ball at that point apparently. Yes I think it’s mad as well. Especially when you consider what was given as a penalty against walker the other night. |
The referee couldn't give a penalty as the offside had occurred before, but it should still have been a red for Pickford. |  |
|  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 18:24 - Oct 17 with 721 views | Wickets |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 15:14 - Oct 17 by Radlett_blue | The referee couldn't give a penalty as the offside had occurred before, but it should still have been a red for Pickford. |
And that is my point. No Pen but must be a red card . |  | |  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 18:31 - Oct 17 with 694 views | strikalite | Just change the damn rule, the attacking player is offside only if there is daylight between him and the last man.... I mean, they want more goals anyway don't they? [Post edited 17 Oct 2020 18:32]
|  | |  |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 18:39 - Oct 17 with 670 views | Swansea_Blue |
VAR Controversy no 100000000 on 14:59 - Oct 17 by ITFC_Forever | Not offside in a million years... the only part of him that is possibly not level or worse is his arm, which you can’t score with anyway. |
It ws today. One in a million is good odds if you can get them |  |
|  |
| |