| Thomas and Harrop 12:49 - Jan 19 with 708 views | homer_123 |
Whilst Harrops preferred position is the number 10 role. We don't operate with that formation.
So, do we see these two coming in as our left and right sided attackers?
Does this mean that Judge will be dropped or will Judge end up playing at right back? |  |
| |  |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:51 - Jan 19 with 686 views | Beckets |
Lambert will probably drop Dozzell and put Judge there. |  | | |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:52 - Jan 19 with 670 views | homer_123 |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:51 - Jan 19 by Beckets |
Lambert will probably drop Dozzell and put Judge there. |
Balls. | |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:52 - Jan 19 with 671 views | Herbivore |
Think Judge is earmarked to play the false 9 role again, either that or give him a go in goal with neither Holy nor Cornell having nailed down the number 1 shirt. |  |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:58 - Jan 19 with 629 views | tractorboy1978 |
Apparently Harrop is coming here to play number 10, was pretty much a condition of the deal. I wouldn't be surprised if Dozzell ends up being the one making way as discussed in an thread earlier. [Post edited 19 Jan 2021 12:59]
|  | | |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:08 - Jan 19 with 572 views | homer_123 |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:58 - Jan 19 by tractorboy1978 |
Apparently Harrop is coming here to play number 10, was pretty much a condition of the deal. I wouldn't be surprised if Dozzell ends up being the one making way as discussed in an thread earlier. [Post edited 19 Jan 2021 12:59]
|
Dozzell isn't and doesn't play as a number 10 though. | |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:08 - Jan 19 with 572 views | homer_123 |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:52 - Jan 19 by Herbivore |
Think Judge is earmarked to play the false 9 role again, either that or give him a go in goal with neither Holy nor Cornell having nailed down the number 1 shirt. |
When you say false, do you mean he's not really footballer? | |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:08 - Jan 19 with 571 views | StokieBlue |
| Thomas and Harrop on 12:52 - Jan 19 by Herbivore |
Think Judge is earmarked to play the false 9 role again, either that or give him a go in goal with neither Holy nor Cornell having nailed down the number 1 shirt. |
The formation simply has to change. If it doesn't then nothing else will change as we don't have enough options to get it forward quicker from the back.
Perhaps a 4-1-2-1-2 diamond or 4-1-3-2 might work. Either way we have to give Jackson a chance playing off another attacker and I still think we should persist with Dozzell in that deep position but he just needs more options going forward.
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:10 - Jan 19 with 554 views | Ewan_Oozami |
They sound like Savile Row Bespoke Outfitters...... |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:11 - Jan 19 with 551 views | homer_123 |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:08 - Jan 19 by StokieBlue |
The formation simply has to change. If it doesn't then nothing else will change as we don't have enough options to get it forward quicker from the back.
Perhaps a 4-1-2-1-2 diamond or 4-1-3-2 might work. Either way we have to give Jackson a chance playing off another attacker and I still think we should persist with Dozzell in that deep position but he just needs more options going forward.
SB |
As someone else has just posted though - you can easily see Lambert dropping Dozzer for Judge.
I can also see Lambert persisting with 1 up top - which means Jacksons strengths continue to be under utilised.
Finally, can he change formation and approach though? If he does, how is that going to chime with what's gone before and rhetoric about consistent approaching and Evans wanting a style and formation etc etc? | |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:13 - Jan 19 with 538 views | StokieBlue |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:11 - Jan 19 by homer_123 |
As someone else has just posted though - you can easily see Lambert dropping Dozzer for Judge.
I can also see Lambert persisting with 1 up top - which means Jacksons strengths continue to be under utilised.
Finally, can he change formation and approach though? If he does, how is that going to chime with what's gone before and rhetoric about consistent approaching and Evans wanting a style and formation etc etc? |
I said it had to happen, not that it would happen.
I don't expect Lambert to change anything and I expect to keep seeing total rubbish dished out on the pitch until promotion is impossible and then he will finally get the sack.
ME is not going to complain if the formation is changed, we play better football and comfortably win matches unless he's a total idiot.
Depressing times.
SB [Post edited 19 Jan 2021 13:14]
| |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:16 - Jan 19 with 517 views | hype313 |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:11 - Jan 19 by homer_123 |
As someone else has just posted though - you can easily see Lambert dropping Dozzer for Judge.
I can also see Lambert persisting with 1 up top - which means Jacksons strengths continue to be under utilised.
Finally, can he change formation and approach though? If he does, how is that going to chime with what's gone before and rhetoric about consistent approaching and Evans wanting a style and formation etc etc? |
Lambert is completely lost in himself with formations, adding two more players to the mix will just confuse him even more, you just can't second guess they guy. |  |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:17 - Jan 19 with 514 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:08 - Jan 19 by homer_123 |
Dozzell isn't and doesn't play as a number 10 though. |
No but you could play a more dynamic midfield 3 with Harrop at the point, Bishop and Downes have the legs to play box to box. | | | |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:22 - Jan 19 with 486 views | suffolkpoker |
Surely we will play Dodz deep playing mid, with 2 infront of him which most likely would be Downes and Bish.
Then we would have a front 3 off Norwood at the point and Harrops left and Thomas right.
Which leaves Harrop out of posistion imo. The only other option is he will play as an attacking mid for Bish or Downes. |  |
| |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:35 - Jan 19 with 452 views | Simonds92 |
| Thomas and Harrop on 13:08 - Jan 19 by homer_123 |
Dozzell isn't and doesn't play as a number 10 though. |
Personally i would be dropping Judge to accomodate him. He pretty much played the 10 role against Swindon and he goes walkabout every game anyway so your not losing anything in terms of the midfield battle. Downes coming in to the team offers more cover with one of Bishop or Dozzell. Personally think the link play from Bishop and the way he carries the ball has been a huge miss for us the last few weeks. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
