| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) 10:45 - Feb 20 with 1677 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
|  | | |  |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 10:47 - Feb 20 with 1664 views | Bluefish |
Because the pay off isn't agreed and contracts signed? That suggests we have days left.
How can he give the team talk when he has such a hollow position? How can he give them a rocket at HT when he has no future here? |  |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 10:51 - Feb 20 with 1626 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 10:47 - Feb 20 by Bluefish |
Because the pay off isn't agreed and contracts signed? That suggests we have days left.
How can he give the team talk when he has such a hollow position? How can he give them a rocket at HT when he has no future here? |
It's a bizarre situation. I don't know much about the financial side of a sacking, and how it works, but I don't get why it couldn't be done as quick as Hurst.
The performance today will be interesting. If they know he's gone then imagine their performance... | | | |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 10:51 - Feb 20 with 1625 views | Freddy |
He's going to give him a bit longer why the play offs are still a possibility?? |  | | |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 10:52 - Feb 20 with 1608 views | Pilgrimblue |
Last game! |  | | |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:00 - Feb 20 with 1524 views | Freddies_Ears |
Maybe they'll announce Lambert's 2 year contract extension later. Which would be awesome trolling! | | | |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:00 - Feb 20 with 1522 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 10:47 - Feb 20 by Bluefish |
Because the pay off isn't agreed and contracts signed? That suggests we have days left.
How can he give the team talk when he has such a hollow position? How can he give them a rocket at HT when he has no future here? |
The pay off would normally be decided by solicitors after a manager is out the door. Standard practice.
My feeling is Evans said, 'Lose to Oxford and you're gone immediately, win or draw and we'll talk again next week'
I just don't see any other reason for him to even be there today. Taylor can take charge. [Post edited 20 Feb 2021 11:01]
|  |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:03 - Feb 20 with 1489 views | Bluefish |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:00 - Feb 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
The pay off would normally be decided by solicitors after a manager is out the door. Standard practice.
My feeling is Evans said, 'Lose to Oxford and you're gone immediately, win or draw and we'll talk again next week'
I just don't see any other reason for him to even be there today. Taylor can take charge. [Post edited 20 Feb 2021 11:01]
|
This isn't a standard case though the release clause is being renegotiated. That is very different to negotiating paying off the end of a contract | |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:05 - Feb 20 with 1463 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:03 - Feb 20 by Bluefish |
This isn't a standard case though the release clause is being renegotiated. That is very different to negotiating paying off the end of a contract |
The release clause is being renegotiated? Where's that come from?
A renegotiation needs Lambert to say 'Yes'. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:07 - Feb 20 with 1436 views | OsborneOneNil |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:00 - Feb 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
The pay off would normally be decided by solicitors after a manager is out the door. Standard practice.
My feeling is Evans said, 'Lose to Oxford and you're gone immediately, win or draw and we'll talk again next week'
I just don't see any other reason for him to even be there today. Taylor can take charge. [Post edited 20 Feb 2021 11:01]
|
I’ll be amazed if he’s on a game by game thing.
He’s gone. |  | | |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:08 - Feb 20 with 1425 views | jayessess |
Either
(a) They've not ironed out the finances on his going yet and taking the first team off him would be a little bit dicey legally
(b) Evans continue to be paralysed by indecision and doubt |  |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:09 - Feb 20 with 1420 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:07 - Feb 20 by OsborneOneNil |
I’ll be amazed if he’s on a game by game thing.
He’s gone. |
Then why leave him on the bench today? Makes no sense.
Unless he won't be, as you say he's gone and the club haven't announced it as yet? | |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:10 - Feb 20 with 1402 views | BlueBadger |
My fervent hope is that Evans is getting some watertight legal advice that will mean he can sack him for minimal outlay. |  |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:10 - Feb 20 with 1386 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:08 - Feb 20 by jayessess |
Either
(a) They've not ironed out the finances on his going yet and taking the first team off him would be a little bit dicey legally
(b) Evans continue to be paralysed by indecision and doubt |
(a) Maybe. Isn't that what 'Gardening Leave' is for??
(b) Probably [Post edited 20 Feb 2021 11:11]
| |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:12 - Feb 20 with 1367 views | Bluefish |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:05 - Feb 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
The release clause is being renegotiated? Where's that come from?
A renegotiation needs Lambert to say 'Yes'. |
Eh? It is quite clear now that there is a performance related break option in the summer. Lambert needs to be in post to activate it and sack him cheaply. Of he is sacked before a full payout is needed. The position is untenable and Lambert is pushing for the pay off now, Evans wanted to wait for the cheap option and says he can sit it our and deny shambert a pay out. They have been at a standoff but have now finally gone to the table to agree a compromise [Post edited 20 Feb 2021 11:15]
| |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:12 - Feb 20 with 1361 views | abracaDOBRA_ |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:10 - Feb 20 by BlueBadger |
My fervent hope is that Evans is getting some watertight legal advice that will mean he can sack him for minimal outlay. |
Thats my hope too. The fact that Phil's article pretty much said he''ll be gone in a few days must mean something is happening.
I mean he wouldn't say that if he wasn't sure of it. | | | |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:16 - Feb 20 with 1315 views | BlueBadger |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:12 - Feb 20 by abracaDOBRA_ |
Thats my hope too. The fact that Phil's article pretty much said he''ll be gone in a few days must mean something is happening.
I mean he wouldn't say that if he wasn't sure of it. |
Given that This Is Ipswich Town, we will probably fluke a win somehow and Lambert will convince Evans to keep him on till next season. | |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:16 - Feb 20 with 1310 views | Bluefish |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:10 - Feb 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
(a) Maybe. Isn't that what 'Gardening Leave' is for??
(b) Probably [Post edited 20 Feb 2021 11:11]
|
Putting him on gardening leave now could leave the clause null and void because he wasn't in position to change the result today | |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:16 - Feb 20 with 1315 views | Fixed_It |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:10 - Feb 20 by BlueBadger |
My fervent hope is that Evans is getting some watertight legal advice that will mean he can sack him for minimal outlay. |
Lambert has begged him for the opportunity to storm out of the post-match presser like Mick did. Evans has agreed as long as Lambert waives his compensation. All agreed amicably. Duff info. |  |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:20 - Feb 20 with 1292 views | jayessess |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:10 - Feb 20 by Cheltenham_Blue |
(a) Maybe. Isn't that what 'Gardening Leave' is for??
(b) Probably [Post edited 20 Feb 2021 11:11]
|
Gardening Leave is a way of seeing out notice period after an employee has resigned/has a set date for termination of employment. Putting an employee on gardening leave without their consent can be construed as constructive dismissal. | |
| |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 11:24 - Feb 20 with 1264 views | billlm |
| If he's going, why's he still in charge today? (n/t) on 10:47 - Feb 20 by Bluefish |
Because the pay off isn't agreed and contracts signed? That suggests we have days left.
How can he give the team talk when he has such a hollow position? How can he give them a rocket at HT when he has no future here? |
Talks, contract extension?, |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
