Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? 12:55 - Mar 21 with 575 viewsfactual_blue

Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter?


Your Vote:

You need to be logged in to vote on our site polls


Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Do you grind your gears
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:06 - Mar 21 with 548 viewsYou_Bloo_Right

No "Battenberg" option?

Poll: Are this group of ITFC players the best squad in the division?

0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:10 - Mar 21 with 544 viewsWD19

Which responses would give pink and yellow segments on the graph?
0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:11 - Mar 21 with 543 viewsMattinLondon

Battenberg is lovely. If any food or drink is to be deemed abusive than ‘real ale’ or ‘bitter’ is more fitting.
0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:24 - Mar 21 with 525 viewswkj

Battenberg is awful, but much less offensive to the taste buds than day old Madera.

Crybaby
Poll: Who do you want to have win the playoffs then?
Blog: The Identity Crisis of Modern Football

0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:26 - Mar 21 with 519 viewswkj

Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:11 - Mar 21 by MattinLondon

Battenberg is lovely. If any food or drink is to be deemed abusive than ‘real ale’ or ‘bitter’ is more fitting.


I do think that Ghostship is horrific if that helps.

Crybaby
Poll: Who do you want to have win the playoffs then?
Blog: The Identity Crisis of Modern Football

0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:34 - Mar 21 with 513 viewsBasingstokeBlue

Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:06 - Mar 21 by You_Bloo_Right

No "Battenberg" option?


Go Battenberg yourself.

Poll: What do you think of the three stars being relocated?

1
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:09 - Mar 21 with 496 viewshoppy

No, because that would be giving it some kind of recognition, which it doesn’t deserve.

Poll: Which Which nickname for ITFC do you prefer? poll do you prefer?
Blog: Graphical Blog: I Feel the Need...

0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:31 - Mar 21 with 490 viewsGeoffSentence

Would it appease you if we called it Mountbatten cake?

Don't boil a kettle on a boat.
Poll: The best Williams to play for Town

0
Login to get fewer ads

Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 15:25 - Mar 21 with 471 viewsfactual_blue

Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:31 - Mar 21 by GeoffSentence

Would it appease you if we called it Mountbatten cake?


No.

Just ban it.

Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Do you grind your gears
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 21:28 - Mar 21 with 417 viewsronnyd

Love it.
0
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 21:37 - Mar 21 with 410 viewsEwan_Oozami

Careful Facters, I'll get the "phantom" on to you...

Just one small problem; sell their houses to who, Ben? Fcking Aquaman?
Poll: What else could go on top of the cake apart from icing and a cherry?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024