| Brizzle are safe but 18:03 - Apr 25 with 2328 views | rgp1 |
Pearson still not committing himself to them should we read into it? |  | | |  |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:04 - Apr 25 with 2310 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Sigh.
No. |  |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:07 - Apr 25 with 2273 views | J2BLUE |
Let's say for a second there is something in it. Pearson goes to an interview at City with (presumably) Ashton. Ashton says look, i'm going to Ipswich in the summer and there may be an opportunity there so why don't you join until the end of the season and then we'll see what happens?
It's clearly a daft theory. Bristol City would rightfully go nuts if this happened. Ashton and Pearson would be left looking like dishonest tossers. It's just not going to happen is it?
Their owner hasn't even met Pearson yet. That's why he has a short deal. They wanted to meet face to face before signing anything more permanent. |  |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:11 - Apr 25 with 2241 views | Illinoisblue |
Mourinho’s available. Should we read something into that too? |  |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:13 - Apr 25 with 2219 views | AlanG296 |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:11 - Apr 25 by Illinoisblue |
Mourinho’s available. Should we read something into that too? |
Paul Lambert's available. Think he's already got a home in the area too. | | | |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:24 - Apr 25 with 2147 views | positivity |
3 points from the last 8 games, that's even worse than us (& cardiff)! | |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:31 - Apr 25 with 2103 views | SuperCoops |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:11 - Apr 25 by Illinoisblue |
Mourinho’s available. Should we read something into that too? |
So is John Duncan. |  | | |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:47 - Apr 25 with 1988 views | AlanG296 |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:31 - Apr 25 by SuperCoops |
So is John Duncan. |
Those were the days. Don't seem as bad now as they did at the time. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:50 - Apr 25 with 1976 views | Illinoisblue |
| Brizzle are safe but on 18:47 - Apr 25 by AlanG296 |
Those were the days. Don't seem as bad now as they did at the time. |
7th in Division 2 felt so disappointing at the time. We’d have a parade for it nowadays. | |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 19:03 - Apr 25 with 1911 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
I hope not!! |  |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 20:55 - Apr 25 with 1687 views | bluejacko |
So despite in every interview and podcast done by our new owners who have stated repeatedly thar Cook is their man you decide that Pearson could be linked to us🙄 | | | |
| Brizzle are safe but on 21:41 - Apr 25 with 1575 views | ArnieM |
Doubt he’d be Paul Cooks assistant somehow , but good suggestion. Next? |  |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 00:57 - Apr 26 with 1391 views | Coastalblue |
| Brizzle are safe but on 20:55 - Apr 25 by bluejacko |
So despite in every interview and podcast done by our new owners who have stated repeatedly thar Cook is their man you decide that Pearson could be linked to us🙄 |
Realistically they're never going to say anything else are they? Plenty of details about the takeover seemed to find their way into the public domain before it happened, Cook being their first choice wasn't one of them. (I think Appleton came up repeatedly?) |  |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 07:52 - Apr 26 with 1206 views | WeWereZombies |
As no one has mentioned Curbishley in the thread yet... |  |
| |
| Brizzle are safe but on 08:24 - Apr 26 with 1134 views | itfcjoe |
Wasn't all the talk at Bristol end that the Chairman had appointed Pearson over Ashton's head, and Pearson was power playing to get more control over transfers etc before signing up?
Either way, I don't think he was Ashton's man - if someone like Lee Johnson was available it would be interesting |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
