| And another WRONG decision 21:36 - Jun 29 with 2037 views | redrickstuhaart |
Despite what the silly american sounding woman says.
Its a natural position, justified by the movement and from 3 yards away.
Simply wrong under the wording of the law. |  | | |  |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:37 - Jun 29 with 2001 views | iamatractorboy |
Are players meant to run with their arms glued to their sides? Ridiculous decision. | | | |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:37 - Jun 29 with 1991 views | SWBlue22 |
That’s a ridiculous decision. |  | | |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:38 - Jun 29 with 1979 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
It's gonna be hard to beat Germany with VAR being so bent. |  |
| |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:39 - Jun 29 with 1956 views | Superblue95 |
2 ridiculously harsh decisions that make so many dislike modern football/VAR |  |
| |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:39 - Jun 29 with 1942 views | LankHenners |
It's right by how UEFA interpret it but very harsh. |  |
| |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:43 - Jun 29 with 1862 views | BlueForYou |
Officials have lost the plot in this match! |  | | |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:45 - Jun 29 with 1843 views | redrickstuhaart |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:39 - Jun 29 by LankHenners |
It's right by how UEFA interpret it but very harsh. |
But the actual laws say something different. So to claim it is a correct intrerpretation is nonsensical. Referees need to apply the laws as written. | | | |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:48 - Jun 29 with 1794 views | LankHenners |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:45 - Jun 29 by redrickstuhaart |
But the actual laws say something different. So to claim it is a correct intrerpretation is nonsensical. Referees need to apply the laws as written. |
Regardless of how daft it is or how angry you're going to get about it, that will be a penalty 10 times out of 10 this tournament because of how UEFA have decided to implement the handball law for it. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| And another WRONG decision on 21:48 - Jun 29 with 1790 views | stonojnr |
that was a ridiculous decision, atypical for Premier League standard refs, but wtf, theyre basically saying boot the ball at someones hand in the penalty area, and you get a free penalty. | | | |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:51 - Jun 29 with 1746 views | stonojnr |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:48 - Jun 29 by LankHenners |
Regardless of how daft it is or how angry you're going to get about it, that will be a penalty 10 times out of 10 this tournament because of how UEFA have decided to implement the handball law for it. |
well you say that, so why arent teams just telling players boot the ball at a players hand all the time in the penalty area, because its free penalty every time then ? | | | |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:55 - Jun 29 with 1676 views | LankHenners |
| And another WRONG decision on 21:51 - Jun 29 by stonojnr |
well you say that, so why arent teams just telling players boot the ball at a players hand all the time in the penalty area, because its free penalty every time then ? |
Because it's easier and more beneficial to try and put it in the goal. | |
| |
| And another WRONG decision on 08:04 - Jun 30 with 1298 views | RIPbobby |
I think I'm getting old because I think it's the right decision. I think rules should be black and white. If it touches you hand then it is breaking the rules.
In my opinion the word 'intention' should not be in the rules. If it hits you it hits you. Just like feet in hockey. Deal with it. |  | | |
| And another WRONG decision on 09:13 - Jun 30 with 1190 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
I think we just need to simplify the whole thing.
If you NEED to draw a line, it’s not offside, if you NEED a ‘snickometer’ it’s not handball.
The game is becoming over officiated and the referee’s love it, because now they are more important than they ever were.
As Clive Tyldesley said last night, “you should be able to apply the rules at all levels, technology will always be different, but as a primary school games teacher, you try explaining to a 9 year old that their silhouette was in an ‘un-natural position’” |  |
| |
| And another WRONG decision on 09:20 - Jun 30 with 1175 views | GlasgowBlue |
It’s not a wrong decision. It’s a wrong rule. We need to go back to the definition of handball being intentional and deliberate. Just like the disallowed goal was technically correct, we need to make the line 12 inches wide so that people can’t be offside by millimetres. |  |
| |
| And another WRONG decision on 09:26 - Jun 30 with 1155 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| And another WRONG decision on 09:20 - Jun 30 by GlasgowBlue |
It’s not a wrong decision. It’s a wrong rule. We need to go back to the definition of handball being intentional and deliberate. Just like the disallowed goal was technically correct, we need to make the line 12 inches wide so that people can’t be offside by millimetres. |
Yep. I’d agree with that. I’m sure the rule is, if you’re level, you’re onside. Not, ‘if you’re level, but your a size 12 and the last defender is a size 7, then you’re offside by 25mm’ | |
| |
| And another WRONG decision on 11:17 - Jun 30 with 991 views | Ryorry |
| And another WRONG decision on 09:26 - Jun 30 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Yep. I’d agree with that. I’m sure the rule is, if you’re level, you’re onside. Not, ‘if you’re level, but your a size 12 and the last defender is a size 7, then you’re offside by 25mm’ |
Good point well made! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
