| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? 20:49 - Oct 19 with 1493 views | 3_5_2 |
Yet another defensive cock up (worrying thing, it seems players are taking turns)
80mins for first shot on target
Burns anonymous / starved of the ball. Omari far better out there.
Or will I be told to go and support another team ?
[Post edited 19 Oct 2024 20:50]
|  |
| |  |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 20:50 - Oct 19 with 1470 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
You do know you're not saying anything controversial don't you? |  |
| |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 20:54 - Oct 19 with 1432 views | 3_5_2 |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 20:50 - Oct 19 by Marshalls_Mullet |
You do know you're not saying anything controversial don't you? |
Just my view, I have others.
But there are fans who think we just accept what we see.
I was at West Ham and I expected us to be better today, but we seem to have lost our way massively
today. Injuries mounting up too so having a solid
Defensive unit seems unlikely.
Personally I would like to see a change of shape but that won’t happen. | |
| |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 21:04 - Oct 19 with 1391 views | GreenEye |
I think we all know that we have to stop giving away cheap goals.
I thought Clarke & Wolfy at the back made a big difference today and would have brought on Sammy sooner.
There's time to fix it but we concede too many early on and Brentford have a habit of coring too many in the first few minutes. Next match needs an intelligent performance.
I don't expect greatness this season but it would be nice to have a bit to cheer about before Christmas. |  | | |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 21:11 - Oct 19 with 1358 views | homer_123 |
What was odd was that Burns had the beating of their full back, as we saw in the first few minutes to create Clarkes opportunity.
We never managed to play him in again all match. |  |
| |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 21:15 - Oct 19 with 1324 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 21:11 - Oct 19 by homer_123 |
What was odd was that Burns had the beating of their full back, as we saw in the first few minutes to create Clarkes opportunity.
We never managed to play him in again all match. |
I don't know if it was burns or mckenna. But burns barely ran into space after that opening exchange. Just hugged the halfway line. |  |
| |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 22:22 - Oct 19 with 1118 views | LittleBoyBlue1 |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 20:50 - Oct 19 by Marshalls_Mullet |
You do know you're not saying anything controversial don't you? |
Plenty of happy clappers on here that bleat "get behind the team" or "why do you have to be so negative" so you can understand the trepidation | | | |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 22:27 - Oct 19 with 1103 views | Dubtractor |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 22:22 - Oct 19 by LittleBoyBlue1 |
Plenty of happy clappers on here that bleat "get behind the team" or "why do you have to be so negative" so you can understand the trepidation |
Christ you are tedious on here after we lose. Going on ignore I think. |  |
| |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 22:28 - Oct 19 with 1064 views | LittleBoyBlue1 |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 22:27 - Oct 19 by Dubtractor |
Christ you are tedious on here after we lose. Going on ignore I think. |
What have I done now 😂
Didn't realise we had such a sensitive fanbase | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Discerning, not sensitive. (n/t) on 22:33 - Oct 19 with 1011 views | Bloots |
| Am I allowed to say that was poor today? on 22:28 - Oct 19 by LittleBoyBlue1 |
What have I done now 😂
Didn't realise we had such a sensitive fanbase |
|  |
| "Trite Sixth-Form Politics” - TWTD User (Sept 2025) |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
