Forum | cheeky bid? by Trequartista

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

cheeky bid? 10:18 - Jan 21 with 3209 views

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ckgxnkwdxnxo

Pretty sure they won't sell to us, but if Wolves weren't a rival, that would be an absolute bargain at £5m in an area we need to improve.

Poll:

Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

cheeky bid? on 10:20 - Jan 21 with 3138 views

Swansea_Blue

Wages?

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

cheeky bid? on 10:23 - Jan 21 with 3056 views

Trequartista

cheeky bid? on 10:20 - Jan 21 by Swansea_Blue
Wages?

There will be wages, yes. He's probably on less than Kalvin Phillips. Wolves won't sell or loan to us anyway.

[Post edited 21 Jan 10:24]

Poll:

Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

cheeky bid? on 10:25 - Jan 21 with 2999 views

Swansea_Blue

cheeky bid? on 10:23 - Jan 21 by Trequartista
There will be wages, yes. He's probably on less than Kalvin Phillips. Wolves won't sell or loan to us anyway. [Post edited 21 Jan 10:24]

I wasn't sure if he's high earner and if we've got the headroom for any more of them. He'd be decent enough.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

cheeky bid? on 10:27 - Jan 21 with 2962 views

bournemouthblue

cheeky bid? on 10:20 - Jan 21 by Swansea_Blue
Wages?

He's also nuts?

	Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll:	How much for Omari

cheeky bid? on 10:34 - Jan 21 with 2846 views

ipswichtillidie

He has essentially downed tools looking for a move and your suggesting him as a target for us, a team in a relegation battle.. Jesus wept

Gav

cheeky bid? on 10:34 - Jan 21 with 2824 views

Mediocre_Quick

Why do we need yet another defensive midfielder?

cheeky bid? on 10:36 - Jan 21 with 2790 views

Trequartista

cheeky bid? on 10:34 - Jan 21 by Mediocre_Quick
Why do we need yet another defensive midfielder?

Because the ones we have are our weakest link. As i posted yesterday, no point buying Philogene if we can't get the ball to him enough.

Poll:

Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

cheeky bid? on 10:45 - Jan 21 with 2662 views

Swansea_Blue

cheeky bid? on 10:34 - Jan 21 by ipswichtillidie
He has essentially downed tools looking for a move and your suggesting him as a target for us, a team in a relegation battle.. Jesus wept

Ah, fails the character test then. Stuff him.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

cheeky bid? on 10:45 - Jan 21 with 2656 views

Mediocre_Quick

cheeky bid? on 10:36 - Jan 21 by Trequartista
Because the ones we have are our weakest link. As i posted yesterday, no point buying Philogene if we can't get the ball to him enough.

Morsy has been class
Philips is coming into form
Cajuste has been class
Taylor has shown he can do it in the prem

We don't need another midfielder to sit,

If anything, our weakest area is up front and in goal

cheeky bid? on 10:47 - Jan 21 with 2618 views

Trequartista

cheeky bid? on 10:45 - Jan 21 by Mediocre_Quick
Morsy has been class Philips is coming into form Cajuste has been class Taylor has shown he can do it in the prem We don't need another midfielder to sit, If anything, our weakest area is up front and in goal

Disagree, see here

Midfield conundrum by Trequartista 20 Jan 10:30
I agree its turning out to be our weakest link. The attacking midfielders are starved of service.

I think Morsy started the season well but has declined, Cajuste is clearly premier league class but as of yet hasn't imposed himself on a game for long enough periods, and I don't think Phillips is any better than neat and tidy. Taylor is not suited to the pivot role and Luongo is only good enough to see games out with 15 mins left.

If we have one more player to come in, that's where we need to strengthen. No point spending all the money on Philogene if we can't get the ball to him.

Do you think up front the strikers are getting plenty of the ball and wasting it?

[Post edited 21 Jan 10:47]

Poll:

Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

cheeky bid? on 10:47 - Jan 21 with 2618 views

ipswichtillidie

cheeky bid? on 10:45 - Jan 21 by Swansea_Blue
Ah, fails the character test then. Stuff him.

Gav

cheeky bid? on 11:05 - Jan 21 with 2336 views

Mediocre_Quick

cheeky bid? on 10:47 - Jan 21 by Trequartista

Disagree, see here

Do you think up front the strikers are getting plenty of the ball and wasting it?

[Post edited 21 Jan 10:47]

Talking to yourself by the looks of things,

You post nothing but negativity

If the midfield was the problem, the management would be targeting midfielders, instead they've targeted attackers,

Shows they know a hell of a lot more than you do

-1

cheeky bid? on 11:12 - Jan 21 with 2225 views

bsw72

Yes - can't imagine that he would be a disruptive influence in our dressing room, his approach to date has been super professional!

cheeky bid? on 11:15 - Jan 21 with 2165 views

SuffolkPunchFC

Unlikely they'd sell to us, and I don't like his attitude - he wouldn't fit in with our team ethos.

cheeky bid? on 11:24 - Jan 21 with 2051 views

NeedhamChris

cheeky bid? on 11:05 - Jan 21 by Mediocre_Quick
Talking to yourself by the looks of things, You post nothing but negativity If the midfield was the problem, the management would be targeting midfielders, instead they've targeted attackers, Shows they know a hell of a lot more than you do

Another poster without either the ability to read or engage in a polite constructive way.

Takes 30 seconds to see that there's nothing obsessively negative about Trequartistas posting, and it's a perfectly reasonable view.

What about the Matic link? I would not be surprised to see us upgrade Massimo this window.

	Winner of the "most obvious troll ever seen on here" award, sponsored by _Clive_Baker
Poll:	If McKenna had gone to Brighton - do you think we'd have had...

cheeky bid? on 14:35 - Jan 21 with 1443 views

Trequartista

cheeky bid? on 11:05 - Jan 21 by Mediocre_Quick
Talking to yourself by the looks of things, You post nothing but negativity If the midfield was the problem, the management would be targeting midfielders, instead they've targeted attackers, Shows they know a hell of a lot more than you do

No need to get upset about differing opinions.

I said Cajuste was clearly Premier League class. Some may think that's overly positive.

[Post edited 21 Jan 14:36]

Poll:

Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

cheeky bid? on 14:45 - Jan 21 with 1336 views

bluefunk

Attitude stinks, no thanks

cheeky bid? on 14:58 - Jan 21 with 1250 views

bluebud

cheeky bid? on 11:05 - Jan 21 by Mediocre_Quick
Talking to yourself by the looks of things, You post nothing but negativity If the midfield was the problem, the management would be targeting midfielders, instead they've targeted attackers, Shows they know a hell of a lot more than you do

We need defenders.

We've just been cuffed 8 - 0 on agregate at home over the past two games

Back 5 or back 3, doesn't matter, its a hotch potch of gambles and hopes that they can step up. It's not looking likely that many of them will or can. BG, granted it was his first game after not playing for a while...all he did was ball watch after a player gets past him at least half a dozen times and I don't remember him tackling once. If you noticed the body language of the players to him they are not convinced. However he isn't the biggest problem.

[Post edited 21 Jan 15:05]

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread