| Rasmus Højlund 17:53 - Mar 9 with 2047 views | gtsb1966 |
Cost United 72million quid and is on the bench not because he has been injured but because he is a waste of money. Shows us what we have to compete with. |  | | |  |
| Rasmus Højlund on 18:05 - Mar 9 with 1974 views | Swansea_Blue |
Utd’s recruitment has been appalling for a while now. Why spend £20 mill on a player who doesn’t quite deliver when you can spend £50-70 mill lol.
Their leadership overall has been pretty crap. And now they’re getting rid of concessions and whacking up prices for the fans to help cover the cost of their incompetence. And the >£1.3 BILLION the Glazers have taken out of the club. It’s sad how one of England’s greatest clubs is being lead by these a-holes. |  |
| |
| Rasmus Højlund on 18:17 - Mar 9 with 1910 views | NeedhamChris |
If there was a team in the PL not to use as the example of a strong bench though, that United bench would be a good shout. |  |
| |
| Rasmus Højlund on 18:30 - Mar 9 with 1874 views | benrhyddingblue |
Probably wished he’d stayed on the bench given the two chances he had late on - didn’t even manage a shot for either | | | |
| Rasmus Højlund on 19:25 - Mar 9 with 1759 views | SaffronWaldenBlues |
He’s an absolute woeful player at this level, if he’s worth that then Delap and even Hirst are worth at least double! |  |
| An East Anglian Town overtaken by Londoners |
| |
| Rasmus Højlund on 20:42 - Mar 9 with 1570 views | Garv |
When he went in at United he looked a great prospect with a lot of aggression and effort. I can see why they spent that.
Inclined to say he'll come good under the right boss and with a bit of confidence. He's young. |  |
| |
| Rasmus Højlund on 20:51 - Mar 9 with 1490 views | Churchman |
| Rasmus Højlund on 18:05 - Mar 9 by Swansea_Blue |
Utd’s recruitment has been appalling for a while now. Why spend £20 mill on a player who doesn’t quite deliver when you can spend £50-70 mill lol.
Their leadership overall has been pretty crap. And now they’re getting rid of concessions and whacking up prices for the fans to help cover the cost of their incompetence. And the >£1.3 BILLION the Glazers have taken out of the club. It’s sad how one of England’s greatest clubs is being lead by these a-holes. |
It’s not just MU. Chelsea blasted £53m on Nkunko has started three times this season and looked poor at PR and £30m on Dewsbury-Divealot who has hardly ripped it up.
However, these clubs can afford it. A £20m buy is a speculative punt to them. Chump change. A snip. That’s what we’ve been up against. |  | | |
| Rasmus Højlund on 22:30 - Mar 9 with 1288 views | vapour_trail |
| Rasmus Højlund on 20:42 - Mar 9 by Garv |
When he went in at United he looked a great prospect with a lot of aggression and effort. I can see why they spent that.
Inclined to say he'll come good under the right boss and with a bit of confidence. He's young. |
100%.
The last decade is littered with world class footballers who have moved to Man U and suddenly become sh1te, as well as absolute failures at Man U who have suddenly recovered form as soon as they’ve moved on to another club.
Basket case of a football club. |  |
| |
| Rasmus Højlund on 08:50 - Mar 10 with 863 views | textbackup |
| Rasmus Højlund on 20:42 - Mar 9 by Garv |
When he went in at United he looked a great prospect with a lot of aggression and effort. I can see why they spent that.
Inclined to say he'll come good under the right boss and with a bit of confidence. He's young. |
Swap for Delap in the summer I reckon |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rasmus Højlund on 10:07 - Mar 10 with 775 views | Garv |
| Rasmus Højlund on 08:50 - Mar 10 by textbackup |
Swap for Delap in the summer I reckon |
Wouldn't be disappointed with that at all, funnily enough. | |
| |
| Rasmus Højlund on 10:11 - Mar 10 with 750 views | textbackup |
| Rasmus Højlund on 10:07 - Mar 10 by Garv |
Wouldn't be disappointed with that at all, funnily enough. |
I bet he would though 😂 | |
| |
| Rasmus Højlund on 11:51 - Mar 10 with 660 views | OldFart71 |
Think they thought they were buying Haarland ? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
