| Another VAR shocker in the United game. 13:48 - May 17 with 857 views | ITFC_Forever |
Clearly just there to make sure the big clubs get the decisions.
Corrupt as feck. |  |
| |  |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 13:49 - May 17 with 831 views | gainsboroughblue |
It wasn't VAR. It was the ref overriding it. |  |
| |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 13:51 - May 17 with 795 views | berkstractorboy |
It isn't actually VAR fault but the ref who watches that back and somehow thinks that is accidental. Beyond shocking that. If VAR wasn't there he probably gives that as a goal anyway so actually VAR has made no difference here it is the officiating. |  | | |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 13:52 - May 17 with 792 views | Westover |
If that had been Town or any of the smaller clubs no way would the goal been given. | | | |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 13:55 - May 17 with 757 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 13:51 - May 17 by berkstractorboy |
It isn't actually VAR fault but the ref who watches that back and somehow thinks that is accidental. Beyond shocking that. If VAR wasn't there he probably gives that as a goal anyway so actually VAR has made no difference here it is the officiating. |
VAR should be outright disallowing it and not even giving the ref the decision. | |
| |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:02 - May 17 with 716 views | berkstractorboy |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 13:55 - May 17 by ITFC_Forever |
VAR should be outright disallowing it and not even giving the ref the decision. |
Don't think it can. If Mbeumo put it in they can as it was a handball immediately before the goal. It's factual. As Cunha scores it then becomes subjective if it was accidental or not. However they got to the decision it is wrong and they need to look at it again and either give VAR greater input, which they don't want to do, or educate the Ref. | | | |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:04 - May 17 with 700 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 13:55 - May 17 by ITFC_Forever |
VAR should be outright disallowing it and not even giving the ref the decision. |
Why don't we just do away with refs and let two blokes in a portacabin at Stockley Park run the match. Sounds ridiculous, but that's what you are suggesting. |  |
| |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:11 - May 17 with 656 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:04 - May 17 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Why don't we just do away with refs and let two blokes in a portacabin at Stockley Park run the match. Sounds ridiculous, but that's what you are suggesting. |
VAR is supposed to be there to ensure the correct decision happens.
It doesn’t.
Wrong decisions are still continually given to protect the big clubs. | |
| |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:13 - May 17 with 637 views | pointofblue |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:11 - May 17 by ITFC_Forever |
VAR is supposed to be there to ensure the correct decision happens.
It doesn’t.
Wrong decisions are still continually given to protect the big clubs. |
Why would they want to protect Manchester United today? This game doesn't matter. Whatever happens they're 99% certain to.finish third. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:15 - May 17 with 618 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:11 - May 17 by ITFC_Forever |
VAR is supposed to be there to ensure the correct decision happens.
It doesn’t.
Wrong decisions are still continually given to protect the big clubs. |
This wasn't really the wrong decision though, for the reasons I've described.
Yes, its absolutely ridiculous, yes its a really stupid interpretation of the rules, yes it needs to be cleared up.
But the correct decision did happen, because the ref went against VAR. If he goes with it, there would be controversy the other way around, as you say, not as extensive but it would still be there. | |
| |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:19 - May 17 with 595 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:15 - May 17 by Cheltenham_Blue |
This wasn't really the wrong decision though, for the reasons I've described.
Yes, its absolutely ridiculous, yes its a really stupid interpretation of the rules, yes it needs to be cleared up.
But the correct decision did happen, because the ref went against VAR. If he goes with it, there would be controversy the other way around, as you say, not as extensive but it would still be there. |
Funnily enough i think had he not given it, no one would have mentioned it again lol. I think 99.9% of people watching those replays expected that to be chalked off |  |
| |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:20 - May 17 with 585 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:19 - May 17 by FrimleyBlue |
Funnily enough i think had he not given it, no one would have mentioned it again lol. I think 99.9% of people watching those replays expected that to be chalked off |
Yep, and I completely get that.
But Sky/MotD would have analysed the fk out of it and created the controversy.
Its definitely what Sky live for.
Edit: They'll now make a controversy out of this and say how the rule is stupid, goes against the game, the ref should have ruled it out, even though he applied the law correctly etc etc etc.
Its apparently 'good telly' [Post edited 17 May 14:23]
| |
| |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:43 - May 17 with 488 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Another VAR shocker in the United game. on 14:13 - May 17 by pointofblue |
Why would they want to protect Manchester United today? This game doesn't matter. Whatever happens they're 99% certain to.finish third. |
Because they’re Man U.
There’s no way that goal would have stood at the other end of the pitch. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
