| Chambers Red Card 11:59 - May 9 with 1521 views | Samuelowen88 |
Do we know when we will hear if it’s been appealed ? |  |
| |  |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:05 - May 9 with 1498 views | Steve_M |
It won't be, no point in risking an extra match ban. He'll just miss the first match of the season. |  |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:07 - May 9 with 1481 views | TractorCam |
We won't appeal. |  |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:07 - May 9 with 1478 views | Superblue95 |
Why would we appeal? It was a blatant red. Accept and move on |  |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:16 - May 9 with 1451 views | Heathlander |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:07 - May 9 by Superblue95 |
Why would we appeal? It was a blatant red. Accept and move on |
Does the double jeopardy thingamajig not come into play? Penalty and a yellow? Or have I got that completely wrong. |  | | |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:18 - May 9 with 1449 views | GlebeTractor |
There is nothing to appeal.
Was it a genuine attempt to play the ball?
It was a pull, so no.
Red card. DOGSO denying obvious goal scoring opportunity. |  |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:21 - May 9 with 1435 views | Superblue95 |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:16 - May 9 by Heathlander |
Does the double jeopardy thingamajig not come into play? Penalty and a yellow? Or have I got that completely wrong. |
That rule only applies if there was a genuine attempt to play the ball. Chambo was pulling him back and kicking his heels for good measure | |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:21 - May 9 with 1434 views | TractorCam |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:16 - May 9 by Heathlander |
Does the double jeopardy thingamajig not come into play? Penalty and a yellow? Or have I got that completely wrong. |
Bart made the save as he was tugged down didn't he? Therefore red card. | |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:22 - May 9 with 1437 views | PhilTWTD |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:05 - May 9 by Steve_M |
It won't be, no point in risking an extra match ban. He'll just miss the first match of the season. |
Just checked and it's not being appealed. Slightly surprised as I think the ref interpreted the rule wrongly in the circumstances and that's the sort of thing the appeals thing was brought in to address.
 No Chambers Red Card Appeal 9th May 2019 12:19Town have decided not to lodge an appeal against the red card skipper Luke Chambers was shown in Sunday's 3-2 final-day victory over Leeds United at Portman Road.  24
|  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Chambers Red Card on 12:26 - May 9 with 1391 views | SouperJim |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:22 - May 9 by PhilTWTD |
Just checked and it's not being appealed. Slightly surprised as I think the ref interpreted the rule wrongly in the circumstances and that's the sort of thing the appeals thing was brought in to address.
No Chambers Red Card Appeal 9th May 2019 12:19Town have decided not to lodge an appeal against the red card skipper Luke Chambers was shown in Sunday's 3-2 final-day victory over Leeds United at Portman Road. 24
|
It's a grey area innit, for me he was holding his shirt while making a genuine attempt to get his foot on the ball. The ref clearly motioned that he was giving the foul for holding his shirt, so on that basis I would guess double jeopardy doesn't apply. |  |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:29 - May 9 with 1389 views | Steve_M |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:22 - May 9 by PhilTWTD |
Just checked and it's not being appealed. Slightly surprised as I think the ref interpreted the rule wrongly in the circumstances and that's the sort of thing the appeals thing was brought in to address.
No Chambers Red Card Appeal 9th May 2019 12:19Town have decided not to lodge an appeal against the red card skipper Luke Chambers was shown in Sunday's 3-2 final-day victory over Leeds United at Portman Road. 24
|
With one camera angle and the obviousness of the foul it makes more sense not to I think even if there is a case.
With 100s of cameras then it might have been different. A bit like the angle on Leeds' second goal. To see the lower tier of the Co-op stand on their feet suggests something was blatantly wrong from that angle. | |
| |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:33 - May 9 with 1382 views | PhilTWTD |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:29 - May 9 by Steve_M |
With one camera angle and the obviousness of the foul it makes more sense not to I think even if there is a case.
With 100s of cameras then it might have been different. A bit like the angle on Leeds' second goal. To see the lower tier of the Co-op stand on their feet suggests something was blatantly wrong from that angle. |
The second goal looked an obvious handball from right at the back of the Co-op Stand and just looked at it again and seems obvious. When are they introducing VAR into League One?
I suppose any appeal on those grounds depends on the referee's opinion. If he says he felt it was a deliberate trip rather than him misintepreting the rule - which you'd guess he might to cover his back - then it might be difficult to overturn. | | | |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:35 - May 9 with 1371 views | PhilTWTD |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:26 - May 9 by SouperJim |
It's a grey area innit, for me he was holding his shirt while making a genuine attempt to get his foot on the ball. The ref clearly motioned that he was giving the foul for holding his shirt, so on that basis I would guess double jeopardy doesn't apply. |
I didn't see the referee gesture - or much of a pull come to that - and all the talk post-match in the press room was about legs getting tangled, which is what it looked like to me, and on the clip I've just watched, although looked clumsier than I remembered at the time. | | | |
| Chambers Red Card on 12:52 - May 9 with 1324 views | Ftnfwest |
there was definitely 'contact' which seems to be enough for a sending off these days! |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
