So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! 17:44 - Jan 24 with 981 views | chrismakin | How the hell has that not been mentioned or even shown on the highlights, [Post edited 24 Jan 2021 17:45]
|  |
| |  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 17:46 - Jan 24 with 952 views | stiff_talking | Toto wonder strike ! Big debate now on whether the ball was actually out of play |  | |  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 17:47 - Jan 24 with 948 views | Romeo4 | It really was quite bizarre. The ball didn’t look like it went out. It would have earned a point. And yet hardly any fuss or emotion was shown when it was ruled out. Just illustrates the apathy around the place. |  | |  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 17:49 - Jan 24 with 921 views | positivity | it was shown on the efl highlights show, looked fine (all the pundits thought it was a goal), but the angle wasn't conclusive. cracking finish from toto, wonder if him and mcguinness should be upfront next week, mcg knows where the net is too |  |
|  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 17:49 - Jan 24 with 914 views | chrismakin |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 17:47 - Jan 24 by Romeo4 | It really was quite bizarre. The ball didn’t look like it went out. It would have earned a point. And yet hardly any fuss or emotion was shown when it was ruled out. Just illustrates the apathy around the place. |
Was going to say, wasn't even mentioned by Lambert either was it? i'd be going mad in that position, probably taken another fine from the FA if that were me |  |
|  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 18:00 - Jan 24 with 826 views | Scuzzer | Yeah. Looked to me as the ball stayed in. Wonderful finish by Toto. Perhaps we need him to play centre forward. |  |
|  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 18:27 - Jan 24 with 715 views | TractorWood |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 17:47 - Jan 24 by Romeo4 | It really was quite bizarre. The ball didn’t look like it went out. It would have earned a point. And yet hardly any fuss or emotion was shown when it was ruled out. Just illustrates the apathy around the place. |
The goal was a handful of seconds after it 'went out' so it's always difficult to know if he would have scored if defenders were fully engaged etc. Ifs and buts. |  |
|  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 18:32 - Jan 24 with 682 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 17:49 - Jan 24 by positivity | it was shown on the efl highlights show, looked fine (all the pundits thought it was a goal), but the angle wasn't conclusive. cracking finish from toto, wonder if him and mcguinness should be upfront next week, mcg knows where the net is too |
"wonder if him and mcguinness should be upfront next week, mcg knows where the net is too" Err clearly not, as we're rubbish with two up. McGuinness on his own. Toto in the no10 role |  |
|  |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 18:36 - Jan 24 with 652 views | Garv |
So,, I stopped watching on 89 minutes yesturday but apparently we scored?! on 18:27 - Jan 24 by TractorWood | The goal was a handful of seconds after it 'went out' so it's always difficult to know if he would have scored if defenders were fully engaged etc. Ifs and buts. |
I doubt there was much more than a second between Chambers' touch and Toto's finish. |  |
|  |
| |