Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? 12:55 - Mar 21 with 651 views factual_blue Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter?
Your Vote: You need to be logged in to vote on our site polls
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:06 - Mar 21 with 624 viewsYou_Bloo_Right No "Battenberg" option?
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:10 - Mar 21 with 620 viewsWD19 Which responses would give pink and yellow segments on the graph?
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:11 - Mar 21 with 619 viewsMattinLondon Battenberg is lovely. If any food or drink is to be deemed abusive than ‘real ale’ or ‘bitter’ is more fitting.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:24 - Mar 21 with 601 viewswkj Battenberg is awful, but much less offensive to the taste buds than day old Madera.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:26 - Mar 21 with 595 viewswkj Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:11 - Mar 21 by MattinLondon Battenberg is lovely. If any food or drink is to be deemed abusive than ‘real ale’ or ‘bitter’ is more fitting.
I do think that Ghostship is horrific if that helps.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:34 - Mar 21 with 589 viewsBasingstokeBlue Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 13:06 - Mar 21 by You_Bloo_Right No "Battenberg" option?
Go Battenberg yourself.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:09 - Mar 21 with 572 viewshoppy No, because that would be giving it some kind of recognition, which it doesn’t deserve.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:31 - Mar 21 with 566 viewsGeoffSentence Would it appease you if we called it Mountbatten cake?
Login to get fewer adsShould 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 15:25 - Mar 21 with 547 viewsfactual_blue Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 14:31 - Mar 21 by GeoffSentence Would it appease you if we called it Mountbatten cake?
No. Just ban it.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 21:28 - Mar 21 with 493 viewsronnyd Love it.
Should 'battenberg' be included as abusive language on the TWTD swear filter? on 21:37 - Mar 21 with 486 viewsEwan_Oozami Careful Facters, I'll get the "phantom" on to you...