| Question for Phil 17:15 - Jun 15 with 1128 views | OwainG1992 |
How important is it for us to actually get decent fees in like the one for Dozzell?
Might be a daft question but what sort of impact do you see it having on recruitment?
Ta. |  |
| |  |
| Question for Phil on 17:45 - Jun 15 with 1039 views | chrismakin |
Altho I'm not phil lol
Isnt it the simple case that any cash up front figures go straight into the % of turnover pot
So Dozzells transfer has basically given us 600k to add to player wage pot. |  |
| |
| Question for Phil on 17:47 - Jun 15 with 1013 views | GavTWTD |
| Question for Phil on 17:45 - Jun 15 by chrismakin |
Altho I'm not phil lol
Isnt it the simple case that any cash up front figures go straight into the % of turnover pot
So Dozzells transfer has basically given us 600k to add to player wage pot. |
Shirley player sales aren't included in the % calculation and you can spend 100% of money gained from sales? I've no idea but that sounds mad. |  |
| |
| Question for Phil on 17:49 - Jun 15 with 972 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Question for Phil on 17:45 - Jun 15 by chrismakin |
Altho I'm not phil lol
Isnt it the simple case that any cash up front figures go straight into the % of turnover pot
So Dozzells transfer has basically given us 600k to add to player wage pot. |
Although not all for this year due to amortisation (transfer fees are averaged out over the length of the contract). |  |
| |
| Question for Phil on 17:49 - Jun 15 with 958 views | footers |
| Question for Phil on 17:47 - Jun 15 by GavTWTD |
Shirley player sales aren't included in the % calculation and you can spend 100% of money gained from sales? I've no idea but that sounds mad. |
makin maths put the notional value of ITFC at £2bn so think it's pretty ropey, tbf. |  |
| |
| Question for Phil on 17:49 - Jun 15 with 957 views | pointofblue |
| Question for Phil on 17:47 - Jun 15 by GavTWTD |
Shirley player sales aren't included in the % calculation and you can spend 100% of money gained from sales? I've no idea but that sounds mad. |
I think that's what chrismakin meant - the money will go into the pot increasing our income, meaning we have an extra £500k (if we've already spent £500k on Burns) to spend on transfer fees or wages. [Post edited 15 Jun 2021 17:53]
|  |
| |
| Question for Phil on 17:49 - Jun 15 with 957 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Question for Phil on 17:45 - Jun 15 by chrismakin |
Altho I'm not phil lol
Isnt it the simple case that any cash up front figures go straight into the % of turnover pot
So Dozzells transfer has basically given us 600k to add to player wage pot. |
Although not all for this year due to amortisation (transfer fees are averaged out over the length of the contract).
Edit - although that might just be for purchases, not sure. | |
| |
| Question for Phil on 17:50 - Jun 15 with 942 views | Cotty |
| Question for Phil on 17:49 - Jun 15 by Swansea_Blue |
Although not all for this year due to amortisation (transfer fees are averaged out over the length of the contract). |
One thing missing from our new backroom staff - a high profile accountant signing |  | | |
| Question for Phil on 17:56 - Jun 15 with 867 views | PhilTWTD |
| Question for Phil on 17:45 - Jun 15 by chrismakin |
Altho I'm not phil lol
Isnt it the simple case that any cash up front figures go straight into the % of turnover pot
So Dozzells transfer has basically given us 600k to add to player wage pot. |
Assume same. If I've read the situation correctly, fees we pay aren't included in the calculation. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Question for Phil on 17:59 - Jun 15 with 810 views | chrismakin |
| Question for Phil on 17:49 - Jun 15 by pointofblue |
I think that's what chrismakin meant - the money will go into the pot increasing our income, meaning we have an extra £500k (if we've already spent £500k on Burns) to spend on transfer fees or wages. [Post edited 15 Jun 2021 17:53]
|
Not as far as I'm aware. Our payments paid out on transfers dont actually effect anything its solely on what comes in where we basically take 60% off it and pop it in the salary pot. ( this Is based on all player sales where money is transferred. So say a player was being sold in installments. The 60% applies to each payment when received not the overall total figure of the transfer value agreed. [Post edited 15 Jun 2021 18:00]
| |
| |
| Question for Phil on 18:02 - Jun 15 with 754 views | pointofblue |
| Question for Phil on 17:59 - Jun 15 by chrismakin |
Not as far as I'm aware. Our payments paid out on transfers dont actually effect anything its solely on what comes in where we basically take 60% off it and pop it in the salary pot. ( this Is based on all player sales where money is transferred. So say a player was being sold in installments. The 60% applies to each payment when received not the overall total figure of the transfer value agreed. [Post edited 15 Jun 2021 18:00]
|
Ah I see - that makes sense.
Thanks for clarifying. [Post edited 15 Jun 2021 18:02]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
