Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Hirst incident 18:18 - Apr 22 with 2076 viewsWickets

Should it have been a penalty for us at 1-0 ?
0
Hirst incident on 18:23 - Apr 22 with 2013 viewsnoggin

100% It looked stonewall to me.

Poll: If KM goes now, will you applaud him when he returns with his new club?

0
Hirst incident on 18:37 - Apr 22 with 1919 viewsWickets

Hirst incident on 18:23 - Apr 22 by noggin

100% It looked stonewall to me.


Yup and Ref gave corner but the defender was nowhere near the ball .
0
Hirst incident on 19:04 - Apr 22 with 1774 viewsDeano69

No doubt in my mind

Poll: Best Tin of Chocolates

0
Deffo.... on 19:18 - Apr 22 with 1696 viewsnorfsufblue

Ref took ages to give a corner because he was trying to work out how to avoid giving a pen!.... giving a goal kick in that situation was ridiculous!
[Post edited 22 Apr 2023 20:48]
0
Hirst incident on 19:20 - Apr 22 with 1677 viewsSwansea_Blue

I can only assume the ref thought he wasn’t going to keep the ball in play and was trying to buy a pen. He did go down a bit easy, but we’ve certainly seen those given.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Hirst incident on 20:28 - Apr 22 with 1461 viewsArnieM

Stonewall penalty . Absolutely not in doubt . What the hell are these Lino’s paid to do ?

Poll: Would this current Town team beat the current narwich team

0
Hirst incident on 22:17 - Apr 22 with 1217 viewsMullet

Was even more blatant than Chaplin's one against PV on Tuesday. Just booted him basically.

Poll: Which itfc kit do you usually buy
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

0
Hirst incident on 22:52 - Apr 22 with 1087 viewsFreddies_Ears

I saw it from my position near the halfway line on the side. Stonewall penalty, defender was nowhere near the ball.
0
Login to get fewer ads

Hirst incident on 00:02 - Apr 23 with 923 viewsPhilTWTD

Consensus from my area of the press box was that it wasn't, which is that end of the field. Thought the defender got a touch at the time but unclear on the video I saw. Also the ball was a fair way from GH so think that may have counted against the claim.
0
Hirst incident on 09:21 - Apr 23 with 564 viewsWickets

Hirst incident on 00:02 - Apr 23 by PhilTWTD

Consensus from my area of the press box was that it wasn't, which is that end of the field. Thought the defender got a touch at the time but unclear on the video I saw. Also the ball was a fair way from GH so think that may have counted against the claim.


Looked stonewall on ifollow !
0
Hirst incident on 09:27 - Apr 23 with 513 viewsDJR

Hirst incident on 00:02 - Apr 23 by PhilTWTD

Consensus from my area of the press box was that it wasn't, which is that end of the field. Thought the defender got a touch at the time but unclear on the video I saw. Also the ball was a fair way from GH so think that may have counted against the claim.


That was my view too, albeit from the opposite end of the pitch.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025