| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! 14:00 - Nov 4 with 5763 views | Mullet |
4-2-3-1 for us then? Connolly this year's Kevin Foley? [Post edited 4 Nov 2017 14:01]
|  |
| |  |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:02 - Nov 4 with 5703 views | StokieBlue |
We don't appear to have a central midfield?
Should be interesting.
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:03 - Nov 4 with 5647 views | pointofblue |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:02 - Nov 4 by StokieBlue |
We don't appear to have a central midfield?
Should be interesting.
SB |
Be fair, will any of us notice the difference? |  |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:05 - Nov 4 with 5574 views | Herbivore |
He's given up hasn't he? |  |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:06 - Nov 4 with 5555 views | LankHenners |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:02 - Nov 4 by StokieBlue |
We don't appear to have a central midfield?
Should be interesting.
SB |
Connolly will play there I guess - when we signed him Joe Royle made a comment about that being the position he'll end up playing.
As against Sunderland, Mick backing his forwards to make the most of playing against a shaky, injury hit defence. Should be goals here today (for both sides). |  |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:06 - Nov 4 with 5539 views | christiand |
What's the formation going to be then? I'm really not convinced that MM knows what his best formation is, best XI etc.... Just seems to get the squad 18 and then picks out the first XI names. | |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:06 - Nov 4 with 5531 views | braveblue |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:02 - Nov 4 by StokieBlue |
We don't appear to have a central midfield?
Should be interesting.
SB |
No change there then!! | | | |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:07 - Nov 4 with 5512 views | floridaboy |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:02 - Nov 4 by StokieBlue |
We don't appear to have a central midfield?
Should be interesting.
SB |
Connolly at right back, Spence with Chambers. Webster alongside Skuse???
Bart
Connolly Chambers Spence Knudsen
Skuse Webster
McGoldrick
Celina Garner Waghorn
Might work! | | | |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:07 - Nov 4 with 5506 views | Northern_Blue81 |
Is Connolly playing at left back with Jonas centre half as a back 5 or is the defender playing centre midfield? Confusing. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:08 - Nov 4 with 5470 views | BackToRussia |
Well. Its more interesting than usual at least. |  |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:10 - Nov 4 with 5416 views | Northern_Blue81 |
Is basically (possibly) a 5-1-4. Makes sense. | | | |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:11 - Nov 4 with 5375 views | Mullet |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:10 - Nov 4 by Northern_Blue81 |
Is basically (possibly) a 5-1-4. Makes sense. |
5-1-4 makes sense? I'd say that'd be the most crazy formation possible! | |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:13 - Nov 4 with 5334 views | Terry_Nutkins |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:02 - Nov 4 by StokieBlue |
We don't appear to have a central midfield?
Should be interesting.
SB |
Connolly and Skuse. Sounds solid to me with lots of creativity ahead of them. Spot on selection. | |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:14 - Nov 4 with 5294 views | Northern_Blue81 |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:11 - Nov 4 by Mullet |
5-1-4 makes sense? I'd say that'd be the most crazy formation possible! |
If we are going to play kick and run, we don't need a midfield. Bring on the 5-1-4 which may well morph into a 4-0-6 if we send the centre half up as another striker and Skuse as attacking midfield. Oof! | | | |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:15 - Nov 4 with 5280 views | christiand |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:11 - Nov 4 by Mullet |
5-1-4 makes sense? I'd say that'd be the most crazy formation possible! |
I like floridaboy’s formation suggestion that makes more sense. | |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:17 - Nov 4 with 5242 views | Northern_Blue81 |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:07 - Nov 4 by floridaboy |
Connolly at right back, Spence with Chambers. Webster alongside Skuse???
Bart
Connolly Chambers Spence Knudsen
Skuse Webster
McGoldrick
Celina Garner Waghorn
Might work! |
Surely we want Webster settled into being our long term CB rather than trying him out as CDM. He may well be our best player in the nest few seasons. | | | |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:18 - Nov 4 with 5217 views | Mullet |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:15 - Nov 4 by christiand |
I like floridaboy’s formation suggestion that makes more sense. |
No it doesn't. It'd be unusual to put Spence at CB with Webster ahead of him in a new role is madness!
I'd suggest Connolly next to Skuse means they can fill in between Spence-Waghorn and Jonas - Celina when PNE try and press us and pin us back in our box.
Nice of Mick to keep us guessing. | |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:21 - Nov 4 with 5170 views | Terry_Nutkins |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:18 - Nov 4 by Mullet |
No it doesn't. It'd be unusual to put Spence at CB with Webster ahead of him in a new role is madness!
I'd suggest Connolly next to Skuse means they can fill in between Spence-Waghorn and Jonas - Celina when PNE try and press us and pin us back in our box.
Nice of Mick to keep us guessing. |
Im with you. Be amazed if its not connolly and Skuse. He even said he would consider that. Its just whether it is 442 as i thought or 4231 as you said. Think you might be right. | |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:27 - Nov 4 with 5062 views | christiand |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:18 - Nov 4 by Mullet |
No it doesn't. It'd be unusual to put Spence at CB with Webster ahead of him in a new role is madness!
I'd suggest Connolly next to Skuse means they can fill in between Spence-Waghorn and Jonas - Celina when PNE try and press us and pin us back in our box.
Nice of Mick to keep us guessing. |
Certainly not madness, Webster could play that role in midfield, also Spence has been exposed a lot recently at right back. However, I think Watson has got it right 4-2-3-1, with what you suggested Mullet, Connolly and Skuse as the defensive midfielders sitting in front of the back 4. Still think these constant changes of formations and personnel on a weekly basis is simply ridiculous. | |
| |
| 4-3-3 on 14:30 - Nov 4 with 5009 views | Dyland |
nft |  |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:35 - Nov 4 with 4969 views | HarryfromBath |
Preston's line-up looks to be something along these lines:
Maxwell
Fisher - Huntington - Boyle - O'Connor
Pearson - Welsh
Barkhuizen - Browne - Johnson
Hugill
Their starting XI is top-heavy with central midfielders. Pearson, Welsh & Browne could end up screening a back four which is made up of the only fully-fit first-team squad defenders they have available. [Post edited 4 Nov 2017 14:35]
|  |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:38 - Nov 4 with 4939 views | connorscontract |
I can't believe you lot are all forgetting Skuse used to play Right Back at Bristol City.
6-0-4 formation. Def info. | | | |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:43 - Nov 4 with 4910 views | Herbivore |
I think we're a 4-2-3-1, just not sure if it's Connolly, Webster or Spence in the 2 with Skuse. | |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:44 - Nov 4 with 4902 views | Northern_Blue81 |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:27 - Nov 4 by christiand |
Certainly not madness, Webster could play that role in midfield, also Spence has been exposed a lot recently at right back. However, I think Watson has got it right 4-2-3-1, with what you suggested Mullet, Connolly and Skuse as the defensive midfielders sitting in front of the back 4. Still think these constant changes of formations and personnel on a weekly basis is simply ridiculous. |
Connolly is suppose to be a left or right full back.
There is talk he MIGHT be a CDM at some point.
I wish we would play players in the correct position and play with what we can do at all times and stop trying to re programme them to try and match up the opponent who I just noted are also playing some sort of 4-2-3-1.
He will change it after 20 mins anyway, so not sure why I am bothered! | | | |
| Spence will surely be at RB (n/t) on 14:49 - Nov 4 with 4873 views | Dyland |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:43 - Nov 4 by Herbivore |
I think we're a 4-2-3-1, just not sure if it's Connolly, Webster or Spence in the 2 with Skuse. |
| |
| |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:51 - Nov 4 with 4861 views | Fixed_It |
| Team news ch-ch-changes! 5 of em! on 14:13 - Nov 4 by Terry_Nutkins |
Connolly and Skuse. Sounds solid to me with lots of creativity ahead of them. Spot on selection. |
Agreed. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
