Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
An americas World Cup then 11:56 - Jun 13 with 2309 viewsvapour_trail

What a week for trump

Trailing vapour since 1999.
Poll: Should Gav and Phil limiti the number of polls?

1
An americas World Cup then on 12:00 - Jun 13 with 2298 viewsconnorscontract

Another one to add to the list of "Reasons to emigrate to Canada".
0
An americas World Cup then on 12:02 - Jun 13 with 2286 viewsJ2BLUE

Was obviously going to happen. The predicted income for the associations voting was much higher with the American bid. After Russia and Qatar it was also an open goal for them. The US could host a world cup next week.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:15 - Jun 13 with 2255 viewsCrock

I hate FIFA. Holding the World Cup in 3 countries is 2 countries too many.
And all 3 of those countries could easily have hosted it by themselves.

Poll: Favourite number?

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:19 - Jun 13 with 2237 viewsStokieBlue

An americas World Cup then on 12:15 - Jun 13 by Crock

I hate FIFA. Holding the World Cup in 3 countries is 2 countries too many.
And all 3 of those countries could easily have hosted it by themselves.


What's the objection? Travel time or just the fact it's 3 countries?

SB

Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:20 - Jun 13 with 2237 viewsconnorscontract

An americas World Cup then on 12:15 - Jun 13 by Crock

I hate FIFA. Holding the World Cup in 3 countries is 2 countries too many.
And all 3 of those countries could easily have hosted it by themselves.


Mexico has hosted it twice already, so less likely to host it on their own again. I think they were included for tactical voting purposes "to broaden the appeal" of the bid.

Better hope Trump doesn't slap tariffs on Scarves, Vuvuzelas and face paint or there will be scenes of carnage at the border as fans criss-cross!
0
An americas World Cup then on 12:23 - Jun 13 with 2229 viewssparks

An americas World Cup then on 12:15 - Jun 13 by Crock

I hate FIFA. Holding the World Cup in 3 countries is 2 countries too many.
And all 3 of those countries could easily have hosted it by themselves.


3 countries is just about ok 3 countries spanning a vast continent is absurd. Well over 2000 miles.

The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it. (Sir Terry Pratchett)
Poll: Is Fred drunk this morning?

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:27 - Jun 13 with 2214 viewsitfcjoe

An americas World Cup then on 12:02 - Jun 13 by J2BLUE

Was obviously going to happen. The predicted income for the associations voting was much higher with the American bid. After Russia and Qatar it was also an open goal for them. The US could host a world cup next week.


The risk reports in the Morocco bid should have ensured it was a walk in the park for the US

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:32 - Jun 13 with 2192 viewsCrock

An americas World Cup then on 12:19 - Jun 13 by StokieBlue

What's the objection? Travel time or just the fact it's 3 countries?

SB


Both

Poll: Favourite number?

0
Login to get fewer ads

An americas World Cup then on 12:41 - Jun 13 with 2161 viewsStokieBlue

An americas World Cup then on 12:32 - Jun 13 by Crock

Both


The travel times in Russia aren't exactly short. It's good they didn't use Vladivostok. The flight from St. Petersburg would be 12 hours.

SB

Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:42 - Jun 13 with 2160 viewsconnorscontract

An americas World Cup then on 12:32 - Jun 13 by Crock

Both


After Manaus in Brazil, travel between Canada and the US, or US and Mexico, will be simple! Canada to Mexico, simple, but longer.

These are high volume leisure and business routes with all the transport infrastructure in place.
1
An americas World Cup then on 12:45 - Jun 13 with 2148 viewsCrock

An americas World Cup then on 12:41 - Jun 13 by StokieBlue

The travel times in Russia aren't exactly short. It's good they didn't use Vladivostok. The flight from St. Petersburg would be 12 hours.

SB


But Russia is one country. And what is the point of including Mexico and Candada in the bid when they have 3 potential host cities each while USA have 17?

Poll: Favourite number?

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:46 - Jun 13 with 2146 viewsStokieBlue

An americas World Cup then on 12:45 - Jun 13 by Crock

But Russia is one country. And what is the point of including Mexico and Candada in the bid when they have 3 potential host cities each while USA have 17?


That's a different point to the travel times though and has been addressed by other posters.

SB

Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:47 - Jun 13 with 2146 viewsCaptainObvious

An americas World Cup then on 12:15 - Jun 13 by Crock

I hate FIFA. Holding the World Cup in 3 countries is 2 countries too many.
And all 3 of those countries could easily have hosted it by themselves.


48 countries as well. what a farce. why don't they just invite the whole world. maybe jupiter as well as a guest.

i.p. verification result : "not blueas"
Poll: Garner or Pitman?

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:47 - Jun 13 with 2144 viewsCaptainObvious

An americas World Cup then on 12:23 - Jun 13 by sparks

3 countries is just about ok 3 countries spanning a vast continent is absurd. Well over 2000 miles.


about as big as Russia though - maybe smaller?
[Post edited 13 Jun 2018 13:02]

i.p. verification result : "not blueas"
Poll: Garner or Pitman?

0
An americas World Cup then on 12:52 - Jun 13 with 2123 viewsCrock

An americas World Cup then on 12:46 - Jun 13 by StokieBlue

That's a different point to the travel times though and has been addressed by other posters.

SB


I said both didn't I?

Poll: Favourite number?

0
An americas World Cup then on 13:01 - Jun 13 with 2095 viewsSuperfrans

An americas World Cup then on 12:15 - Jun 13 by Crock

I hate FIFA. Holding the World Cup in 3 countries is 2 countries too many.
And all 3 of those countries could easily have hosted it by themselves.


To be fair, there wasn't much choice. Morocco were the only other bidder and they were clearly incapable of hosting it, given the number of countries participating and the fact they have none of the stadia or infrastructure built.

It's another of the flaws of this plan to expand to 48 teams - they've immediately reduced the pool of potential hosts.

I do hope England bid again soon. It would be great to get it back here, maybe in 2030...

Poll: What is your voting intention on December 12?
Blog: Dear Martin Samuel...

0
An americas World Cup then on 14:04 - Jun 13 with 2020 viewshorsehollerer

An americas World Cup then on 12:23 - Jun 13 by sparks

3 countries is just about ok 3 countries spanning a vast continent is absurd. Well over 2000 miles.


That said, it's still quicker to fly north/south between Canada and Mexico than east/west between NYC and LA.

Blog: The Late, Late Blubfest Show

0
An americas World Cup then on 14:20 - Jun 13 with 1998 viewsCurrie10

Almost as if Trump gets things done and knows what he's doing............
0
An americas World Cup then on 14:23 - Jun 13 with 1992 viewsSpruceMoose

An americas World Cup then on 14:20 - Jun 13 by Currie10

Almost as if Trump gets things done and knows what he's doing............


Almost as if some people are desperate to give him credit for things he doesn't deserve credit for!

Pronouns: He/Him/His. "Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country."
Poll: Selectamod

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024