| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:07 - Aug 28 with 4476 views | textbackup |
at what point do we just sack them off. |  |
|  |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:17 - Aug 28 with 4344 views | Bent_double |
Can't the FL step in and help, or the PFA?
The player clearly wants to move here, but sounds like Blackpool are doing there best to mess things up for everyone. |  |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:22 - Aug 28 with 4285 views | textbackup |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:17 - Aug 28 by Bent_double |
Can't the FL step in and help, or the PFA?
The player clearly wants to move here, but sounds like Blackpool are doing there best to mess things up for everyone. |
that said, we have no idea what ME is doing with the deal.... he might be taking £5 off every time it comes close to finalising | |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:25 - Aug 28 with 4253 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:22 - Aug 28 by textbackup |
that said, we have no idea what ME is doing with the deal.... he might be taking £5 off every time it comes close to finalising |
I think it’s been reported elsewhere that Blackpool are the ones moving the goal posts. Town have agreed a fee, only for Blackpool to turn round and say they want more.
As you say though, all getting a bit stupid now. |  |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:32 - Aug 28 with 4164 views | ReusersTown |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:17 - Aug 28 by Bent_double |
Can't the FL step in and help, or the PFA?
The player clearly wants to move here, but sounds like Blackpool are doing there best to mess things up for everyone. |
What sort of suggestion is that?!. Anytime a player want's to move the PFA can step in and force it? Ridiculous! |  | | |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:32 - Aug 28 with 4161 views | pointofblue |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:07 - Aug 28 by textbackup |
at what point do we just sack them off. |
Got to be soon, otherwise we're going to run out of time for an alternative. There could be another player/club in absolute limbo over this who may tell us where to go due to us treating them as a Plan B option. | |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:40 - Aug 28 with 4070 views | TraktahBoi |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:32 - Aug 28 by pointofblue |
Got to be soon, otherwise we're going to run out of time for an alternative. There could be another player/club in absolute limbo over this who may tell us where to go due to us treating them as a Plan B option. |
That’s if there is a Plan B option if the Tilt deal goes Pete Tong and we don’t stitch ourselves up like previous windows. Guessing that would be Oshilaja at Wimbledon? Someone mentioned Danny Batth at Wolves on the forum earlier, would love that but don’t think he fits the PH mould based on his signings so far. | | | |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:40 - Aug 28 with 4064 views | jas0999 |
Whatever happens with this deal, we need a CB and Striker by Friday. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:47 - Aug 28 with 3978 views | Bent_double |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:32 - Aug 28 by ReusersTown |
What sort of suggestion is that?!. Anytime a player want's to move the PFA can step in and force it? Ridiculous! |
No, not everytime, just in situations where it appears that one party is messing the other two parties around.
OK? | |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:48 - Aug 28 with 3962 views | Freddy |
it'll get done this week, just dragging on | | | |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:59 - Aug 28 with 3862 views | ReusersTown |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:47 - Aug 28 by Bent_double |
No, not everytime, just in situations where it appears that one party is messing the other two parties around.
OK? |
Not really as all that has happened is we want to buy their player and they have rejected our offers. Would set a stupid precedent, if it were even possible. | | | |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:12 - Aug 28 with 3745 views | Currie10 |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:25 - Aug 28 by Kieran_Knows |
I think it’s been reported elsewhere that Blackpool are the ones moving the goal posts. Town have agreed a fee, only for Blackpool to turn round and say they want more.
As you say though, all getting a bit stupid now. |
Well they've hardly moved it from £700k - £4.5 mill have they.
Stop penny pinching and finish it off. |  | | |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:15 - Aug 28 with 3711 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:12 - Aug 28 by Currie10 |
Well they've hardly moved it from £700k - £4.5 mill have they.
Stop penny pinching and finish it off. |
That’s not the point.
If you agree a price with someone, it’s taking the p1ss if they then change their mind and ask for more. |  |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:15 - Aug 28 with 3698 views | HARRY10 |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:25 - Aug 28 by Kieran_Knows |
I think it’s been reported elsewhere that Blackpool are the ones moving the goal posts. Town have agreed a fee, only for Blackpool to turn round and say they want more.
As you say though, all getting a bit stupid now. |
"Blackpool to turn round "
would that mean they then have their backs to us ? | | | |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:22 - Aug 28 with 3601 views | SpruceMoose |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:12 - Aug 28 by Currie10 |
Well they've hardly moved it from £700k - £4.5 mill have they.
Stop penny pinching and finish it off. |
Easy to say when you're spending somebody else's money... |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:29 - Aug 28 with 3513 views | BLUEBEAT |
Bored with it.
Just tell Blackpool to fck off.
It’s not like there’s a load of other clubs lined up gagging for some Tilt to the hilt... |  |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:57 - Aug 28 with 3271 views | Bent_double |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 19:59 - Aug 28 by ReusersTown |
Not really as all that has happened is we want to buy their player and they have rejected our offers. Would set a stupid precedent, if it were even possible. |
You don't know that they have rejected our offer(s).
We don't know if they suddenly upped the price that had previously been agreed when they discovered we were down to our last fit CB.
They appear to have history as far as messing other clubs around with transfers goes.
Considering their financial situation, you'd think they'd be happy to agree a fee now and get a players wages off the books.
Of course, it could be us that are the problem. | |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:59 - Aug 28 with 3254 views | pointofblue |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:57 - Aug 28 by Bent_double |
You don't know that they have rejected our offer(s).
We don't know if they suddenly upped the price that had previously been agreed when they discovered we were down to our last fit CB.
They appear to have history as far as messing other clubs around with transfers goes.
Considering their financial situation, you'd think they'd be happy to agree a fee now and get a players wages off the books.
Of course, it could be us that are the problem. |
Both Andy Holt and Darragh MacAnthony stated we were hard but fair to deal with when questioned on Twitter; I can't see why we would be acting any differently towards Blackpool. | |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 22:57 - Aug 28 with 2851 views | ArnieM |
So yet again we’ll Pratt around trying to sign a player . Go to the wire . Don’t get him and are left with ONE fit/ available CB. Only at f luckin Ipswich . Do we never learn?? |  |
| |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 23:19 - Aug 28 with 2747 views | ReusersTown |
| Tilt deal taken a backward step according to EADT on 20:57 - Aug 28 by Bent_double |
You don't know that they have rejected our offer(s).
We don't know if they suddenly upped the price that had previously been agreed when they discovered we were down to our last fit CB.
They appear to have history as far as messing other clubs around with transfers goes.
Considering their financial situation, you'd think they'd be happy to agree a fee now and get a players wages off the books.
Of course, it could be us that are the problem. |
None of that was your point though from reading the original comment. You want a governing body to intervene as blackpool will not currently sell us their player!, as i stated thats ridiculous!. Blackpool can conduct their business however they like, within reason | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
