Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish 15:42 - Aug 21 with 6966 viewskizaitfc

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-singapore-research/singapo

Poll: Mick in or out? (not a dig at Mick just want to see the overall opinion on here)

0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:48 - Aug 21 with 3334 viewsjeera

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:46 - Aug 21 by gazzer1999

Excellent, even the mighty moose missed that one, looks like you got good grades this week.


1,000 lines for you.

Poll: Xmas dinner: Yorkshires or not?

0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:49 - Aug 21 with 3333 viewsFreddies_Ears

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 17:50 - Aug 21 by footers

Yeah, only 46,000 dead and multiple feck ups and u-turns on important policy.

Never change, gazzer.


Plus 20,000 untested but still Covid excess deaths in care homes.
1
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:51 - Aug 21 with 3332 viewsgazzer1999

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:48 - Aug 21 by jeera

1,000 lines for you.


That takes me back a bit to primary school, sorry sir I must do better.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:55 - Aug 21 with 3311 viewsjeera

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:51 - Aug 21 by gazzer1999

That takes me back a bit to primary school, sorry sir I must do better.


Primary!!?

You must be younger than me. I had to use a nibbed pen in those days.

Preferably fountain, but we were allowed the new modern fancy cartridges.

We were usually only given up to 100 lines because any more and it become rather expensive.
[Post edited 21 Aug 2020 21:56]

Poll: Xmas dinner: Yorkshires or not?

1
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:58 - Aug 21 with 3301 viewsfooters

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:51 - Aug 21 by gazzer1999

That takes me back a bit to primary school, sorry sir I must do better.


In every subject.

Here's some maths homework:

How much per taxpayer has the UK spent on Brexit?

I'll accept data from January this year onwards. And of course await your reply of what benefits we're each paying for that. Cheers.

Dear old footers KC - Private Counsel to Big Farmer - Liberator of Vichy TWTD
Poll: Battle of the breakfast potato... who wins?

0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 22:00 - Aug 21 with 3303 viewsjeera

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 21:49 - Aug 21 by Freddies_Ears

Plus 20,000 untested but still Covid excess deaths in care homes.


The loss of life is bad enough, but the unnecessary loss too...

Also, the money wasted could have been used to save and change lives. I keep seeing this £15 billion touted around and that sounds beyond all reasoning.

I did post search results on this earlier but not sure anyone looked. I know the subject has been covered lots of times but in the region of £15 billion?

https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=ufs_X-PcG8i45gLPl4KYCQ&q=money+wasted

Poll: Xmas dinner: Yorkshires or not?

0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 02:15 - Aug 22 with 3238 viewsEnigma_Blue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:56 - Aug 21 by footers

Ha!

Yes, 'they', whoever 'they' may be, are very sly and only publish things on super-secret websites like Reuters and Associated Press for people to read. Pretty clever if you think about it. Hiding in plain sight.


I could be wrong but assume he is referring to me. If it is then that's not exactly what I said, I listed sources i prefer to get my news from as I believe they are more reliable & less biased compared to most mainstream sources, two of them where Reuters & the associated press, i did list others.

Despite being the world's leading multimedia international news agency Reuters is not particularly well known when it comes to the public consciousness therefore some people don't consider it mainstream. I prefer to use them because they are generally amongst the most reliable and unbiased sources of news as more often than not their reporting is based on information straight from source, same with the Associated press.

I also mentioned Al Jazeera, Rich Planet TV amongst others such as Off Guardian.
Not quite the same as stating I don't use Mainstream media I use Reuters & The associated press.

5/10 for effort though.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 3:14]
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 08:17 - Aug 22 with 3189 viewsTractorWood

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:50 - Aug 21 by jeera

There was another poster on here not so long ago boasting they don't get their news from mainstream media.

Being in the know, they prefer to 'rely on Reuters and Associated Press.'

Marvellous stuff.


Ridiculous. I try to get a truly balanced media intake with the BBC, Guardian and Russia today.

I know that was then, but it could be again..
Poll: At present who do you think you'll vote for?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 13:52 - Aug 22 with 3135 viewsLibero

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 02:15 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

I could be wrong but assume he is referring to me. If it is then that's not exactly what I said, I listed sources i prefer to get my news from as I believe they are more reliable & less biased compared to most mainstream sources, two of them where Reuters & the associated press, i did list others.

Despite being the world's leading multimedia international news agency Reuters is not particularly well known when it comes to the public consciousness therefore some people don't consider it mainstream. I prefer to use them because they are generally amongst the most reliable and unbiased sources of news as more often than not their reporting is based on information straight from source, same with the Associated press.

I also mentioned Al Jazeera, Rich Planet TV amongst others such as Off Guardian.
Not quite the same as stating I don't use Mainstream media I use Reuters & The associated press.

5/10 for effort though.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 3:14]


Rich Planet TV, lol.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 14:31 - Aug 22 with 3103 viewsEnigma_Blue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 13:52 - Aug 22 by Libero

Rich Planet TV, lol.


Richard D Hall is an excellent independent investigative journalist. I don't agree with all of his findings and he really should distance himself from that Holocaust denier lunatic Dr Nick Kollastrom but in the main he gets more right than he does wrong. He is extremely good at exposing many untruths that are pushed forward by the more main stream media. Some people lazily label him as a conspiracy theorist and lump him in with the likes of David Icke. The difference is Rich D Hall actually investigates & researches as opposed to Icke who just spouts wild theories.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 14:32]
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 14:38 - Aug 22 with 3094 viewsStokieBlue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 14:31 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

Richard D Hall is an excellent independent investigative journalist. I don't agree with all of his findings and he really should distance himself from that Holocaust denier lunatic Dr Nick Kollastrom but in the main he gets more right than he does wrong. He is extremely good at exposing many untruths that are pushed forward by the more main stream media. Some people lazily label him as a conspiracy theorist and lump him in with the likes of David Icke. The difference is Rich D Hall actually investigates & researches as opposed to Icke who just spouts wild theories.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 14:32]


WTAF.

I had never heard of RichTV but I've taken a 1 minute look and this is on there and by Hall himself makes your entire post invalid.

In early 2020 it was announced that a new virus was sweeping the globe. People all over the world have been subjected to "lockdown" measures, curtailment of freedom and travel bans in a supposed attempt to slow the "spread" of the supposed Corona virus. In just a few weeks the UK has caved in to completely unnecessary fascist measures being dictated by global oligarchs from outside of the country. The whole Corona nonsense has shown just how spineless our politicians and leaders are, as if we didn't know already. Like a lizard crawling out from a desert rock, Bill Gates appeared on BBC Breakfast News extolling his plan to vaccinate the entire world. The megalomaniac geek couldn't keep the filthy smug grin from his face, as he explained his plan to "write cheques" for governments so they could buy his soon to be released vaccine. If you think this man has honourable intentions you need to go and have your brain extracted and replaced with a one that works. Richard D. Hall explains ...


https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=282&part=1&gen=9

He's just as bad as the other people you've cited. Some of the other stuff on there is awful.

SB
1
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:03 - Aug 22 with 3073 viewsEnigma_Blue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 14:38 - Aug 22 by StokieBlue

WTAF.

I had never heard of RichTV but I've taken a 1 minute look and this is on there and by Hall himself makes your entire post invalid.

In early 2020 it was announced that a new virus was sweeping the globe. People all over the world have been subjected to "lockdown" measures, curtailment of freedom and travel bans in a supposed attempt to slow the "spread" of the supposed Corona virus. In just a few weeks the UK has caved in to completely unnecessary fascist measures being dictated by global oligarchs from outside of the country. The whole Corona nonsense has shown just how spineless our politicians and leaders are, as if we didn't know already. Like a lizard crawling out from a desert rock, Bill Gates appeared on BBC Breakfast News extolling his plan to vaccinate the entire world. The megalomaniac geek couldn't keep the filthy smug grin from his face, as he explained his plan to "write cheques" for governments so they could buy his soon to be released vaccine. If you think this man has honourable intentions you need to go and have your brain extracted and replaced with a one that works. Richard D. Hall explains ...


https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=282&part=1&gen=9

He's just as bad as the other people you've cited. Some of the other stuff on there is awful.

SB


A 1 minute look lol

I stated in my post I don't agree with every conclusion he comes to. Just because you or I may not agree with certain theories does not make my post invalid and it certainly doesn't make all of his work invalid either. The thing with him is his conclusions are not set in stone and as new evidence comes to light he actually changes his views on certain things.

All his videos are free to view & the only way he makes money is from a speaking tour he does once a year where it's clear the proceeds from this go to furthering his investigations & research, the lengths he goes to in his investigations is quite something.

Writing of somebody's entire body of work done over a ten year period based on a one minute glance is just laughable.

His investigation into the Joe Cox murder is his best and a real eye opener. If people don't want to take the time to watch this or any of his other videos that's fine but I would say if they don't their opinion of him and his work is not valid.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 15:06]
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:09 - Aug 22 with 3062 viewsLibero

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 14:31 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

Richard D Hall is an excellent independent investigative journalist. I don't agree with all of his findings and he really should distance himself from that Holocaust denier lunatic Dr Nick Kollastrom but in the main he gets more right than he does wrong. He is extremely good at exposing many untruths that are pushed forward by the more main stream media. Some people lazily label him as a conspiracy theorist and lump him in with the likes of David Icke. The difference is Rich D Hall actually investigates & researches as opposed to Icke who just spouts wild theories.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 14:32]


LOL, f*cking helllll.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:11 - Aug 22 with 3061 viewsLibero

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 14:38 - Aug 22 by StokieBlue

WTAF.

I had never heard of RichTV but I've taken a 1 minute look and this is on there and by Hall himself makes your entire post invalid.

In early 2020 it was announced that a new virus was sweeping the globe. People all over the world have been subjected to "lockdown" measures, curtailment of freedom and travel bans in a supposed attempt to slow the "spread" of the supposed Corona virus. In just a few weeks the UK has caved in to completely unnecessary fascist measures being dictated by global oligarchs from outside of the country. The whole Corona nonsense has shown just how spineless our politicians and leaders are, as if we didn't know already. Like a lizard crawling out from a desert rock, Bill Gates appeared on BBC Breakfast News extolling his plan to vaccinate the entire world. The megalomaniac geek couldn't keep the filthy smug grin from his face, as he explained his plan to "write cheques" for governments so they could buy his soon to be released vaccine. If you think this man has honourable intentions you need to go and have your brain extracted and replaced with a one that works. Richard D. Hall explains ...


https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=282&part=1&gen=9

He's just as bad as the other people you've cited. Some of the other stuff on there is awful.

SB


Yep, this is why I’m lolling, along with various other tw@tty things he’s said.

Don’t get me wrong, sone of his Maddy McCann stuff was actually very well donee did asked pertinent questions, but unfortunately he’s a crack pot loon that’s desperate to jump from one conspiracy theory to another, not an investigative journalist.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:14 - Aug 22 with 3054 viewsStokieBlue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:03 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

A 1 minute look lol

I stated in my post I don't agree with every conclusion he comes to. Just because you or I may not agree with certain theories does not make my post invalid and it certainly doesn't make all of his work invalid either. The thing with him is his conclusions are not set in stone and as new evidence comes to light he actually changes his views on certain things.

All his videos are free to view & the only way he makes money is from a speaking tour he does once a year where it's clear the proceeds from this go to furthering his investigations & research, the lengths he goes to in his investigations is quite something.

Writing of somebody's entire body of work done over a ten year period based on a one minute glance is just laughable.

His investigation into the Joe Cox murder is his best and a real eye opener. If people don't want to take the time to watch this or any of his other videos that's fine but I would say if they don't their opinion of him and his work is not valid.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 15:06]


Conversely, if one peddles conspiracy theories in such a brazen manner then one can expect the rest of ones body of work to be called into question.

"The difference is Rich D Hall actually investigates & researches as opposed to Icke who just spouts wild theories."

Doesn't look that way from the first article I saw and cited. Perhaps he has some excellent stuff in there but if you associate with conspiracies then you have a long way to build that credibility back up again.

So a further quick glance:

- He believes the Manchester bombing was fabricated
- He believes the Boston Marathon bombing was fabricated
- Doesn't believe that NASA has rovers on Mars
- 9/11 cover ups
- That no planes hit the towers on 9/11 and they were removed with advanced technology and the pictures faked
- Energy devices that are withheld that break the laws of thermodynamics
- The secret space fleet

That doesn't even begin to mention what other people have posted on that channel.

Why does not making money mean that his views are valid?

SB
1
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:16 - Aug 22 with 3051 viewsLibero

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:14 - Aug 22 by StokieBlue

Conversely, if one peddles conspiracy theories in such a brazen manner then one can expect the rest of ones body of work to be called into question.

"The difference is Rich D Hall actually investigates & researches as opposed to Icke who just spouts wild theories."

Doesn't look that way from the first article I saw and cited. Perhaps he has some excellent stuff in there but if you associate with conspiracies then you have a long way to build that credibility back up again.

So a further quick glance:

- He believes the Manchester bombing was fabricated
- He believes the Boston Marathon bombing was fabricated
- Doesn't believe that NASA has rovers on Mars
- 9/11 cover ups
- That no planes hit the towers on 9/11 and they were removed with advanced technology and the pictures faked
- Energy devices that are withheld that break the laws of thermodynamics
- The secret space fleet

That doesn't even begin to mention what other people have posted on that channel.

Why does not making money mean that his views are valid?

SB


Yup, you’ve got the measure if him.

I’ve watched all his McCann documentaries and the 9/11 stuff.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:48 - Aug 22 with 3021 viewsEnigma_Blue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:14 - Aug 22 by StokieBlue

Conversely, if one peddles conspiracy theories in such a brazen manner then one can expect the rest of ones body of work to be called into question.

"The difference is Rich D Hall actually investigates & researches as opposed to Icke who just spouts wild theories."

Doesn't look that way from the first article I saw and cited. Perhaps he has some excellent stuff in there but if you associate with conspiracies then you have a long way to build that credibility back up again.

So a further quick glance:

- He believes the Manchester bombing was fabricated
- He believes the Boston Marathon bombing was fabricated
- Doesn't believe that NASA has rovers on Mars
- 9/11 cover ups
- That no planes hit the towers on 9/11 and they were removed with advanced technology and the pictures faked
- Energy devices that are withheld that break the laws of thermodynamics
- The secret space fleet

That doesn't even begin to mention what other people have posted on that channel.

Why does not making money mean that his views are valid?

SB


If you are not prepared to watch at least some of his videos in their entirety then it is not possible to debate this.

Not making money does not make his views more valid but he can't be accused of pushing conspiracy theories just to try & make money is what I mean.

I don't agree with his theory on 9/11 or that the Sandy Hook Massacre was False Flag although that theory is pushed more by Dr Kollastrom. But some of his other investigations are excellent. His Maddie McCann investigation as Libero mentioned also the Joe Cox Murder and the Cumbria shootings are well worth a watch.

I watched the Manchester Arena bombings video in its entirety and whilst I don't agree with his overall conclusion that the event was fabricated i do believe the amount of victims particularly the injured was exaggerated. It is clear after that video the UK media put out fake photos & videos of the aftermath of the event. Of course this doesn't mean the whole event was fabricated and I certainly don't believe it was.
Like I said though it is not possible to debate any of his work unless people take the time to analyse it.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 15:55]
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:54 - Aug 22 with 3017 viewsStokieBlue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:48 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

If you are not prepared to watch at least some of his videos in their entirety then it is not possible to debate this.

Not making money does not make his views more valid but he can't be accused of pushing conspiracy theories just to try & make money is what I mean.

I don't agree with his theory on 9/11 or that the Sandy Hook Massacre was False Flag although that theory is pushed more by Dr Kollastrom. But some of his other investigations are excellent. His Maddie McCann investigation as Libero mentioned also the Joe Cox Murder and the Cumbria shootings are well worth a watch.

I watched the Manchester Arena bombings video in its entirety and whilst I don't agree with his overall conclusion that the event was fabricated i do believe the amount of victims particularly the injured was exaggerated. It is clear after that video the UK media put out fake photos & videos of the aftermath of the event. Of course this doesn't mean the whole event was fabricated and I certainly don't believe it was.
Like I said though it is not possible to debate any of his work unless people take the time to analyse it.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 15:55]


So in summary you don't really believe quite a lot of what he says but people should still watch it because you do believe one or two things he says.

You're going to need to prove that rather horrible position that the number of injuries in Manchester was exaggerated given you are agreeing with it and not just citing him.

Frankly I am not willing to spend my time watching someone who has some clearly odious views and opinions which even you, as someone who likes some of his work, think are wrong.

SB
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 16:00]
1
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 16:05 - Aug 22 with 3001 viewsLibero

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:48 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

If you are not prepared to watch at least some of his videos in their entirety then it is not possible to debate this.

Not making money does not make his views more valid but he can't be accused of pushing conspiracy theories just to try & make money is what I mean.

I don't agree with his theory on 9/11 or that the Sandy Hook Massacre was False Flag although that theory is pushed more by Dr Kollastrom. But some of his other investigations are excellent. His Maddie McCann investigation as Libero mentioned also the Joe Cox Murder and the Cumbria shootings are well worth a watch.

I watched the Manchester Arena bombings video in its entirety and whilst I don't agree with his overall conclusion that the event was fabricated i do believe the amount of victims particularly the injured was exaggerated. It is clear after that video the UK media put out fake photos & videos of the aftermath of the event. Of course this doesn't mean the whole event was fabricated and I certainly don't believe it was.
Like I said though it is not possible to debate any of his work unless people take the time to analyse it.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 15:55]


I’ve watched hours of him and think Stokie’s dead right.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 16:20 - Aug 22 with 2989 viewsEnigma_Blue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 15:54 - Aug 22 by StokieBlue

So in summary you don't really believe quite a lot of what he says but people should still watch it because you do believe one or two things he says.

You're going to need to prove that rather horrible position that the number of injuries in Manchester was exaggerated given you are agreeing with it and not just citing him.

Frankly I am not willing to spend my time watching someone who has some clearly odious views and opinions which even you, as someone who likes some of his work, think are wrong.

SB
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 16:00]


Just because I don't agree with some of his views is not reason enough for me to stop watching all his videos for a chance to find out more about an event that hasn't been portrayed in the mainstream media and perhaps get nearer to the full story. I often check other sources to back up his claims. I did this after watching his Maddie Mccann investigation by reading the Portuguese police files. His UK based investigations are on the whole excellent and they often raise some very pertinent questions.

In terms of proving the number of injuries in Manchester was exaggerated all the evidence is there in his video. And if you or anyone else isnt prepared to watch his video then watch UK Critical Thinkers video on YouTube.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 16:33]
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 16:23 - Aug 22 with 2983 viewsEnigma_Blue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 16:05 - Aug 22 by Libero

I’ve watched hours of him and think Stokie’s dead right.


You think Stokie is dead right but yet you have wasted hours of your life watching this odious man's video's.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 16:43 - Aug 22 with 2968 viewsLibero

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 16:23 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

You think Stokie is dead right but yet you have wasted hours of your life watching this odious man's video's.


Yes, was that not clear in my initial response?

It’s from watching his content I’ve reached this conclusion.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 16:43]
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 17:10 - Aug 22 with 2948 viewsEnigma_Blue

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 16:43 - Aug 22 by Libero

Yes, was that not clear in my initial response?

It’s from watching his content I’ve reached this conclusion.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 16:43]


No as apparently Stokie has been able to come to the exact same conclusion as you after watching just one minute of a video and a quick browse of his website. What took you so long then? I am wondering if perhaps some of his videos you actually found really interesting and informative but you just can't bring yourself to admit it.
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 17:12 - Aug 22 with 2941 viewsLibero

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 17:10 - Aug 22 by Enigma_Blue

No as apparently Stokie has been able to come to the exact same conclusion as you after watching just one minute of a video and a quick browse of his website. What took you so long then? I am wondering if perhaps some of his videos you actually found really interesting and informative but you just can't bring yourself to admit it.


Interesting? certainly and occasionally informative, however he undercuts any pertinent point he has by jumping around from conspiracy theory to conspiracy theory, reporting each one with the same level of certainty, regardless of factual accuracies/inaccuracies.

He’s a crack pot.
[Post edited 22 Aug 2020 17:14]
0
Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 17:39 - Aug 22 with 2923 viewsBlueBadger

Some positive news re. COVID-19 the media don't publish on 20:44 - Aug 21 by gazzer1999

Wright on cue guys, it was said tongue in cheek. Didn't expect to be classed with racists and be knocked to the ground though. Still never mind you lot keep up your act, and promote aggression.


It would look a loo more 'tongue in cheek' if wasn't something you actually believe though.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025