| Woolfy gone? (n/t) 17:41 - Sep 22 with 3781 views | Bluefish |
|  |
| |  |
| Aquaducts? (n/t) on 12:02 - Sep 23 with 410 views | Bloots |
| I think you are.... on 11:43 - Sep 23 by NthQldITFC |
Ah yes, but what have the Tootingites ever done for us? [Post edited 23 Sep 2020 11:44]
|
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:11 - Sep 23 with 390 views | Superblue95 |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 09:20 - Sep 23 by MonkeyAlan |
Woolly is injured. Out for 2 months. You are a drama queen. |
Who’s doing the commentary from now on so if Brenner is out of action? |  |
| |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:31 - Sep 23 with 357 views | PJH |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 11:25 - Sep 23 by PhilTWTD |
Lambert didn't know on Friday. I don't think the signing has anything to do with it, they've been after a centre-half all summer, Richard Keogh was obviously one they were trying to sign. McGuinness evidently impressed in the game down here and I'd heard whispers soon after that that we were looking at getting someone on loan but didn't know who it might be. |
But when we were actively looking for another centre-half it seemed that Toto was as good as finished here didn't it?
At the moment we have (in theory) five central defenders for two places. |  | | |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:37 - Sep 23 with 343 views | hype313 |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:31 - Sep 23 by PJH |
But when we were actively looking for another centre-half it seemed that Toto was as good as finished here didn't it?
At the moment we have (in theory) five central defenders for two places. |
To be fair 3 of the 5 can play at RB and LB, so given the fact that KVY isn't reliable on the Injury front and as good as Ward has been, at 35 can we expect him to play the vast majority of games that come thick and fast?
Think it's a shrewd bit of business, which will probably cost us peanuts. |  |
| |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:46 - Sep 23 with 323 views | PJH |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:37 - Sep 23 by hype313 |
To be fair 3 of the 5 can play at RB and LB, so given the fact that KVY isn't reliable on the Injury front and as good as Ward has been, at 35 can we expect him to play the vast majority of games that come thick and fast?
Think it's a shrewd bit of business, which will probably cost us peanuts. |
Yes that makes sense but at the moment we seem to have more urgent needs than another central defender unless there are major long term doubts about KVY or Woolfy (or both) being available to us.
It does look to be a very good bit of business in isolation although the question (for me anyway) is still why have we done it? | | | |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:50 - Sep 23 with 305 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Woolfy gone? (n/t) on 12:46 - Sep 23 by PJH |
Yes that makes sense but at the moment we seem to have more urgent needs than another central defender unless there are major long term doubts about KVY or Woolfy (or both) being available to us.
It does look to be a very good bit of business in isolation although the question (for me anyway) is still why have we done it? |
If we don't get a striker who can be a hold-up man and score goals then yes, this will seem an odd acquisition. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
