| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land 23:56 - Mar 2 with 159627 views | Muncher |
I’ve been doing a bit of digging at HM Land Registry today and what I have seen backs up what Phil has previously mentioned and leads me to believe the takeover is well underway and likely just waiting EFL approval.
The Playford Road site (2 parcels of land) is the subject of a priority search in respect of an intended purchase by Gamechanger 20 Ltd which was lodged on 23 February by law firm Gateley PLC out of their Birmingham office (first instruction by that client).The Bent Lane site is subject to a similar priority search in respect of part of the site only, meaning the Evans group company is retaining part of it.
A priority search is carried out by solicitors to preserve their place in the queue of potential applications for dealing, it confers a priority period of about 45 days. It is a matter of public record and available to view by professionals who have the requisite portal account. It is typically only done in the immediate anticipation of completing a transaction, it can be done slightly ahead of this, but usually is done on the day of exchange of contracts. I’m a commercial property solicitor so carry out these searches on a regular basis. My best guess (based on the timing of the search) is Evans likely entered into a conditional contract last Tuesday for the sale of the land (and club). You would not carry out such a search unless a deal including the detail had either been agreed or was extremely close. The reason such searches are not carried out lightly is because it prevents the proprietor from entering into other transactions while the priority is lodged. If a deal is not happening you should cancel the search, but all 3 remain in place.
There is no corresponding priority search in respect of the stadium lease and I would not expect there to be as the lease is owned by the club as tenant and I would expect Gamechanger 20 Ltd is acquiring the existing share capital owned by Evans.
I am happy to share screenshots if anyone would like to see, but the searches are in relation to the Playford Road site (title number SK219236 & SK203140) and the bent lane site (SK200320) they appear under the “application enquiry” tab.
EDIT:
I have now have a placed a brief article on my firm's website here discussing it:
https://prettys.co.uk/news/takeover-ipswich-town-football-club-could-be-progress
[Post edited 8 Mar 2021 12:59]
|  | | |  |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:35 - Mar 23 with 5353 views | Beckets |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:32 - Mar 23 by itfcbishop |
I'm 99% sure Evans is waiting to play out this season. He wouldn't sell if we got promoted but would probably look at offers if we're stuck in league one. We have a new manager and the easiest run-in.
People have said he can add a clause in the contract if we are promoted. But he won't sell in the championship. I believe Evans really wants Ipswich to succeed. Unfortunately i feel he hasn't got a clue how to run a football club. People with money and power are way too stubborn to just roll over. [Post edited 23 Mar 2021 12:40]
|
On the contrary, I’d say he has got a clue how to ruin a football club! |  | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:40 - Mar 23 with 5313 views | 70s_Legend |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:32 - Mar 23 by itfcbishop |
I'm 99% sure Evans is waiting to play out this season. He wouldn't sell if we got promoted but would probably look at offers if we're stuck in league one. We have a new manager and the easiest run-in.
People have said he can add a clause in the contract if we are promoted. But he won't sell in the championship. I believe Evans really wants Ipswich to succeed. Unfortunately i feel he hasn't got a clue how to run a football club. People with money and power are way too stubborn to just roll over. [Post edited 23 Mar 2021 12:40]
|
He has a strong history of sitting on his hands too long and not making decisions when they need to made. That's why we're sitting here now in league one waiting for a new manager to start a new era at the end of March when it should have started months/years ago.
To try and drag out a deal until May when it has already been agreed in principle just because the season might suddenly come good would be pinnacle Evans. You just know he is going to balls this up and we'll still be floundering around between plans in a years time. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:40 - Mar 23 with 5307 views | itfcbishop |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:35 - Mar 23 by Beckets |
On the contrary, I’d say he has got a clue how to ruin a football club! |
i must of had how much he has ruined the club on my mind! |  | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:45 - Mar 23 with 5285 views | Muncher |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:21 - Mar 23 by Hessleblue |
Thanks for the regular updates Muncher. Given the searches have now been in place for a month, what is your professional opinion on the likelihood of conditional contracts having been exchanged? |
I can't say definitively. You could have a deal which is completely dead in the water and the searches are just allowed to lapse, that would be fairly normal.
You wouldn't do the searches unless you were going under contract, or you thought you were likely to go under contract. It could be that they never actually went under contract for whatever reason, last minute delays or a charge of heart.
It strikes me as odd that a deal would progress in terms of pre-completion property searches and getting EFL approval if the numbers or the principle of the deal was not agreed.
Considering how a deal could fall apart, if I had to guess I would say it would be most likely to fall over before it went to the EFL, rather than after.
Completely unconnected from a football club purchase (which is far more complex), if I saw priority searches had been lodged in favour of my neighbour's house for an impending purchase, I would say the likelihood of me having new neighbours in a few weeks time would be extremely high. I'd put the welcome bottle of wine on the shopping list for the next trip to Sainsburys, put it that way. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:06 - Mar 23 with 5171 views | Battersea_Blue |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 12:09 - Mar 23 by tractorboy1978 |
I'd assume the EFL's ratification is around the background of those involved, ability to fund the club, where the funds are coming from and suitability of the consortium as owners. I doubt it goes into the final intricacies of the consideration Evans is receiving etc so highly possible a deal could be sent to the EFL without final terms being agreed. |
I've not posted for a long time, just "lurked". Been keeping tabs on this thread, biting my tongue at times, but perhaps I can add some insight into acquisitions in general, as that is my profession.
I've answered this post as @tractorboy1978 is correct.
The process has obviously gone through all the normal stages - interest, deal agreed in principle, heads of terms and NDA's. That's when the work really starts, as it's the due diligence where the intricacies are determined. All heads of terms does is lay out the deal in principle, primarily from the information the seller provides to the buyer. Of course "digging" is done prior to heads of terms, but this is only what's in the public domain and what can be gleaned from 3rd parties. It's only when due diligence is performed that the real truths come out.
I would imagine the EFL were made aware once heads of terms and NDA's had been signed.
While the EFL begin their ratification process, the due diligence will also get under way. This is where any skeletons would come out, if the people doing the due diligence do their job properly. It'll consist of going through all the financials in minute detail, all contracts, commitments, historic business dealings, personnel, etc. etc. etc.
In my years of experience in acquisitions, over 60% of deals fall through at due diligence stage, for a multitude of reasons. It may be issues come to light that weren't declared at heads of terms stage, it might be items the seller didn't realise would be a problem for the buyer, it might be items the seller hoped the buyer wouldn't find.
Items could be found that affect the buyers valuation, whereby a re-negotiation takes place, or one of both parties just walk away. I've had the due diligence process take anything from two weeks to 6 months, depending on the complexity of the business being sold and in every single case deals have been re-negotiated due to findings during the due diligence process.
I'll give an example of one acquisition I consulted on that went belly up at quite a late stage in the due diligence process. Price had been agreed and the whole structure of the acquisition had been mapped out. One of the final stages was looking through all the personnel files and we found that the owner had offered all staff who worked with the company for 10 years a paid 6 month sabbatical, where they could simply take off on a fully paid holiday for 6 months. Ironically two very senior employees were due to qualify for this within months and were planning their 6 months off. The buyer pulled out immediately.
So I imagine there's a very thorough due diligence process happening right now, which could take many weeks. And at any time the buyer may find something to cause them to either re-negotiate or simply pull out. Due diligence also works both ways - I'm sure Marcus's people are all over the potential buyer too.
There's lots that can go wrong, right up to the day of signing final contracts. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:40 - Mar 23 with 5046 views | tractorboy1978 |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:06 - Mar 23 by Battersea_Blue |
I've not posted for a long time, just "lurked". Been keeping tabs on this thread, biting my tongue at times, but perhaps I can add some insight into acquisitions in general, as that is my profession.
I've answered this post as @tractorboy1978 is correct.
The process has obviously gone through all the normal stages - interest, deal agreed in principle, heads of terms and NDA's. That's when the work really starts, as it's the due diligence where the intricacies are determined. All heads of terms does is lay out the deal in principle, primarily from the information the seller provides to the buyer. Of course "digging" is done prior to heads of terms, but this is only what's in the public domain and what can be gleaned from 3rd parties. It's only when due diligence is performed that the real truths come out.
I would imagine the EFL were made aware once heads of terms and NDA's had been signed.
While the EFL begin their ratification process, the due diligence will also get under way. This is where any skeletons would come out, if the people doing the due diligence do their job properly. It'll consist of going through all the financials in minute detail, all contracts, commitments, historic business dealings, personnel, etc. etc. etc.
In my years of experience in acquisitions, over 60% of deals fall through at due diligence stage, for a multitude of reasons. It may be issues come to light that weren't declared at heads of terms stage, it might be items the seller didn't realise would be a problem for the buyer, it might be items the seller hoped the buyer wouldn't find.
Items could be found that affect the buyers valuation, whereby a re-negotiation takes place, or one of both parties just walk away. I've had the due diligence process take anything from two weeks to 6 months, depending on the complexity of the business being sold and in every single case deals have been re-negotiated due to findings during the due diligence process.
I'll give an example of one acquisition I consulted on that went belly up at quite a late stage in the due diligence process. Price had been agreed and the whole structure of the acquisition had been mapped out. One of the final stages was looking through all the personnel files and we found that the owner had offered all staff who worked with the company for 10 years a paid 6 month sabbatical, where they could simply take off on a fully paid holiday for 6 months. Ironically two very senior employees were due to qualify for this within months and were planning their 6 months off. The buyer pulled out immediately.
So I imagine there's a very thorough due diligence process happening right now, which could take many weeks. And at any time the buyer may find something to cause them to either re-negotiate or simply pull out. Due diligence also works both ways - I'm sure Marcus's people are all over the potential buyer too.
There's lots that can go wrong, right up to the day of signing final contracts. |
Thanks for that - really interesting. And with a football club there are a whole host of potential 'sticking points' that could equate to sizeable £££ differences in valuation. Even more so with the fall out of COVID I would imagine, i.e who fronts the cost for the ST compensation due for this season? | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:55 - Mar 23 with 4981 views | hype313 |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:06 - Mar 23 by Battersea_Blue |
I've not posted for a long time, just "lurked". Been keeping tabs on this thread, biting my tongue at times, but perhaps I can add some insight into acquisitions in general, as that is my profession.
I've answered this post as @tractorboy1978 is correct.
The process has obviously gone through all the normal stages - interest, deal agreed in principle, heads of terms and NDA's. That's when the work really starts, as it's the due diligence where the intricacies are determined. All heads of terms does is lay out the deal in principle, primarily from the information the seller provides to the buyer. Of course "digging" is done prior to heads of terms, but this is only what's in the public domain and what can be gleaned from 3rd parties. It's only when due diligence is performed that the real truths come out.
I would imagine the EFL were made aware once heads of terms and NDA's had been signed.
While the EFL begin their ratification process, the due diligence will also get under way. This is where any skeletons would come out, if the people doing the due diligence do their job properly. It'll consist of going through all the financials in minute detail, all contracts, commitments, historic business dealings, personnel, etc. etc. etc.
In my years of experience in acquisitions, over 60% of deals fall through at due diligence stage, for a multitude of reasons. It may be issues come to light that weren't declared at heads of terms stage, it might be items the seller didn't realise would be a problem for the buyer, it might be items the seller hoped the buyer wouldn't find.
Items could be found that affect the buyers valuation, whereby a re-negotiation takes place, or one of both parties just walk away. I've had the due diligence process take anything from two weeks to 6 months, depending on the complexity of the business being sold and in every single case deals have been re-negotiated due to findings during the due diligence process.
I'll give an example of one acquisition I consulted on that went belly up at quite a late stage in the due diligence process. Price had been agreed and the whole structure of the acquisition had been mapped out. One of the final stages was looking through all the personnel files and we found that the owner had offered all staff who worked with the company for 10 years a paid 6 month sabbatical, where they could simply take off on a fully paid holiday for 6 months. Ironically two very senior employees were due to qualify for this within months and were planning their 6 months off. The buyer pulled out immediately.
So I imagine there's a very thorough due diligence process happening right now, which could take many weeks. And at any time the buyer may find something to cause them to either re-negotiate or simply pull out. Due diligence also works both ways - I'm sure Marcus's people are all over the potential buyer too.
There's lots that can go wrong, right up to the day of signing final contracts. |
I should imagine there a few skeletons lurking around which are rising from the ground.... |  |
| |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:55 - Mar 23 with 4976 views | Muncher |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:40 - Mar 23 by tractorboy1978 |
Thanks for that - really interesting. And with a football club there are a whole host of potential 'sticking points' that could equate to sizeable £££ differences in valuation. Even more so with the fall out of COVID I would imagine, i.e who fronts the cost for the ST compensation due for this season? |
On a share sale it will almost certainly be the buyer, but they will take it into account as a liability going forward, much like many others. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:15 - Mar 23 with 4908 views | Battersea_Blue |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:55 - Mar 23 by Muncher |
On a share sale it will almost certainly be the buyer, but they will take it into account as a liability going forward, much like many others. |
Yes, in the case of a football club the liabilities and potential assets will form a large part of due diligence. Potential assets would not only be player valuations but any sell-on clauses we have on players previously sold. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:18 - Mar 23 with 4888 views | Beckets |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:15 - Mar 23 by Battersea_Blue |
Yes, in the case of a football club the liabilities and potential assets will form a large part of due diligence. Potential assets would not only be player valuations but any sell-on clauses we have on players previously sold. |
The issue of will there/won’t there be a salary cap and in what form could be another potential delay? | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:24 - Mar 23 with 4857 views | Battersea_Blue |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:18 - Mar 23 by Beckets |
The issue of will there/won’t there be a salary cap and in what form could be another potential delay? |
It possibly was a potential delay when the salary cap was in place and the PFA about to vote on it, but my understanding is that going forward there will be no salary cap. That would have certainly changed the dynamics and forward planning. I imagine the potential buyer is pleased there'll be no salary cap. [Post edited 23 Mar 2021 14:25]
| | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:26 - Mar 23 with 4840 views | tractorboy1978 |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:15 - Mar 23 by Battersea_Blue |
Yes, in the case of a football club the liabilities and potential assets will form a large part of due diligence. Potential assets would not only be player valuations but any sell-on clauses we have on players previously sold. |
It would certainly be a point of discussion when it comes to the selling price. That's a £2m-£3m liability potentially. As you say, asset values and other liabilities will also come into consideration. Although as far as player valuations go - I can't imagine much credence is placed on them as a player can go from being worth a couple of million to almost nothing over night! [Post edited 23 Mar 2021 14:27]
| | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:40 - Mar 23 with 4793 views | Battersea_Blue |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:26 - Mar 23 by tractorboy1978 |
It would certainly be a point of discussion when it comes to the selling price. That's a £2m-£3m liability potentially. As you say, asset values and other liabilities will also come into consideration. Although as far as player valuations go - I can't imagine much credence is placed on them as a player can go from being worth a couple of million to almost nothing over night! [Post edited 23 Mar 2021 14:27]
|
Yes, that's one of the major reasons why buying a football club is so complex.
If I was writing the contract on behalf of Marcus I'd have all sorts of "if this happens" in there. If I was writing the contract on behalf of the potential buyers my "if this happens" section would be almost non-existent.
Imagine how Marcus would feel if there were no "if this happens" clauses, next season Flynn Downes flourishes and Man U buy him for £8 million. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:58 - Mar 23 with 4734 views | Metal_Hacker |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:40 - Mar 23 by Battersea_Blue |
Yes, that's one of the major reasons why buying a football club is so complex.
If I was writing the contract on behalf of Marcus I'd have all sorts of "if this happens" in there. If I was writing the contract on behalf of the potential buyers my "if this happens" section would be almost non-existent.
Imagine how Marcus would feel if there were no "if this happens" clauses, next season Flynn Downes flourishes and Man U buy him for £8 million. |
You had me then up until the last paragraph  |  |
| |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 18:16 - Mar 23 with 4491 views | BlueBorn86 |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:58 - Mar 23 by Metal_Hacker |
You had me then up until the last paragraph |
@union602 has tweeted this and Brett Johnson liked it on Twitter.
“We love them, but we are very biased after the ones who owned us our first few years. They have done everything they said, they have made us one of the top clubs at our level & continue to push forward year after year. If/When the takeover happens, you won't be disappointed.”
Sorry, I don’t know how to share screenshots! Make of it what you will. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 19:22 - Mar 23 with 4375 views | Dennyx4 |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:40 - Mar 23 by Battersea_Blue |
Yes, that's one of the major reasons why buying a football club is so complex.
If I was writing the contract on behalf of Marcus I'd have all sorts of "if this happens" in there. If I was writing the contract on behalf of the potential buyers my "if this happens" section would be almost non-existent.
Imagine how Marcus would feel if there were no "if this happens" clauses, next season Flynn Downes flourishes and Man U buy him for £8 million. |
Is this the likely reason there were no player sales in January?
We had offers for Jackson & Donacien, that were reported, but maybe the consortium would reduce the purchase price by any sale.
May explain why we sent Donacien out on loan, as opposed to selling for a fee. May even have got a loan fee for him. |  | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 21:24 - Mar 23 with 4203 views | TheBoyBlue |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 07:50 - Mar 23 by SenatorBlue |
This frustrates the hell out of me.
What this club desperately needs is structure, football experienced leaders, investment and an injection of interest and invigoration, not a continuation of part time leadership and investment at a level that barely keeps us afloat, whilst player quality continuously declines, by someone who recently said the structure is in place. News flash Marcus, no it isn’t.
We finally have hired the right manager, but he’ll soon get frustrated when his attempts to rebuild after the cull are hampered by a frees and loans budget, and zero recruitment structure and analysis in place to identify the players that fit his style.
As things stand, under Evans, and the longer he dwells/holds on/doesn’t show anything that he actually does want to give it a go, I have no faith this summer will be anything other than a failure. [Post edited 23 Mar 2021 7:51]
|
Depressing isn't it?
Personally I think Paul Cook is his best managerial appointment yet (bar McCarthy, that's not saying much admittedly!), but the best we can hope for with Evans at the helm is that he will slow the decline. Maybe he'll get us up, but we won't be competitive and will likely come back down. Once Cook goes, the slide to League 2 will continue. | |
| |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 23:51 - Mar 23 with 4062 views | Battersea_Blue |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 19:22 - Mar 23 by Dennyx4 |
Is this the likely reason there were no player sales in January?
We had offers for Jackson & Donacien, that were reported, but maybe the consortium would reduce the purchase price by any sale.
May explain why we sent Donacien out on loan, as opposed to selling for a fee. May even have got a loan fee for him. |
That's a possibility, but unlikely in my opinion.
Marcus wouldn't stop 'business as usual", unless the completion of the deal was really imminent. Plus there would be provisions in any contract that would take income and potential income into account.
You do bring up a good point on acquisitions in general, though in the case of selling a football club, it doesn't apply so much.
My first piece of advice to any seller when I'm involved in the potential sale of their business is "keep focussed on your business = business as usual". Too many owners get outside interest and immediately start thinking about emigrating to a desert island, buying the Ferrari, moving into a big house, etc. etc. Worst thing to do. The potential seller simply must keep focussed on running their business as if no deal was going to happen. Seen it so many times. Revenue and profits start to drop cos he/she is thinking about the money. With the process potentially taking months, a business can fall off a cliff in that period unless the owner keeps focussed.
In the case of a football club, it's not so much outgoings but incomings that might be curtailed if a deal is close, as the owner won't want to spend his/her money. That could be why we got a bunch of loan signings in the transfer window rather than outright purchases. | | | |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 09:17 - Mar 24 with 3790 views | Kieran_Knows |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 18:16 - Mar 23 by BlueBorn86 |
@union602 has tweeted this and Brett Johnson liked it on Twitter.
“We love them, but we are very biased after the ones who owned us our first few years. They have done everything they said, they have made us one of the top clubs at our level & continue to push forward year after year. If/When the takeover happens, you won't be disappointed.”
Sorry, I don’t know how to share screenshots! Make of it what you will. |
|  |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 09:26 - Mar 24 with 3746 views | Kieran_Knows |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 18:16 - Mar 23 by BlueBorn86 |
@union602 has tweeted this and Brett Johnson liked it on Twitter.
“We love them, but we are very biased after the ones who owned us our first few years. They have done everything they said, they have made us one of the top clubs at our level & continue to push forward year after year. If/When the takeover happens, you won't be disappointed.”
Sorry, I don’t know how to share screenshots! Make of it what you will. |
| |
| |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 09:31 - Mar 24 with 3732 views | xrayspecs |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 23:51 - Mar 23 by Battersea_Blue |
That's a possibility, but unlikely in my opinion.
Marcus wouldn't stop 'business as usual", unless the completion of the deal was really imminent. Plus there would be provisions in any contract that would take income and potential income into account.
You do bring up a good point on acquisitions in general, though in the case of selling a football club, it doesn't apply so much.
My first piece of advice to any seller when I'm involved in the potential sale of their business is "keep focussed on your business = business as usual". Too many owners get outside interest and immediately start thinking about emigrating to a desert island, buying the Ferrari, moving into a big house, etc. etc. Worst thing to do. The potential seller simply must keep focussed on running their business as if no deal was going to happen. Seen it so many times. Revenue and profits start to drop cos he/she is thinking about the money. With the process potentially taking months, a business can fall off a cliff in that period unless the owner keeps focussed.
In the case of a football club, it's not so much outgoings but incomings that might be curtailed if a deal is close, as the owner won't want to spend his/her money. That could be why we got a bunch of loan signings in the transfer window rather than outright purchases. |
On loans versus permanent signings in January, I suspect the salary cap played a significant part in our approach.
We were told the we were already at the cap, so could not add more new contracts. I suspect that we are not paying the wages of the loanees, the lending clubs being more interested in them getting game time and experience. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:43 - Mar 24 with 3496 views | ArnieM |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 18:16 - Mar 23 by BlueBorn86 |
@union602 has tweeted this and Brett Johnson liked it on Twitter.
“We love them, but we are very biased after the ones who owned us our first few years. They have done everything they said, they have made us one of the top clubs at our level & continue to push forward year after year. If/When the takeover happens, you won't be disappointed.”
Sorry, I don’t know how to share screenshots! Make of it what you will. |
Who is union 602? |  |
| |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:53 - Mar 24 with 3470 views | BlueBorn86 |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:43 - Mar 24 by ArnieM |
Who is union 602? |
I think, they are a group of fans from a team that he has already purchased. Blue Action style. | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 14:40 - Mar 24 with 3371 views | RopeyAdvice |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:53 - Mar 24 by BlueBorn86 |
I think, they are a group of fans from a team that he has already purchased. Blue Action style. |
“There’s a lot of work going on behind the scenes and I think our supporters can be excited and happy with that." | | | |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 15:05 - Mar 24 with 3306 views | ArnieM |
| The takeover by Gamechanger 20 Ltd - The training ground land on 13:53 - Mar 24 by BlueBorn86 |
I think, they are a group of fans from a team that he has already purchased. Blue Action style. |
Ah ok ... well I guess Brett would give that a thumbs up then wouldnt he . | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
