| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? 23:00 - Dec 2 with 1572 views | chrismakin |
I expect
Walton
Donacien
Toto
Edmundson
Clements
Morsy
Evans
Jackson
Chaplin
Celina
Bonne |  |
| |  |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:04 - Dec 3 with 324 views | clive_baker |
We need to go strong, but with the context of a big league game Tuesday night, so it's a balance for me.
Walton
KVY
Woolfenden
Edmundson
Penney
Evans
Harper
Edwards
Chaplin
Aluko
Pigott
Hold back Donacien, Bonne, Morsy, Celina for Tuesday. |  |
| |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:15 - Dec 3 with 300 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Jackson?!?!
ZERO chance.
Two goals against teenagers in a pointless cup will not get him a starting place.
Bench.. maybe. |  |
| |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:24 - Dec 3 with 269 views | Mookamoo |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:04 - Dec 3 by clive_baker |
We need to go strong, but with the context of a big league game Tuesday night, so it's a balance for me.
Walton
KVY
Woolfenden
Edmundson
Penney
Evans
Harper
Edwards
Chaplin
Aluko
Pigott
Hold back Donacien, Bonne, Morsy, Celina for Tuesday. |
That seems good to me.
Maybe try and give El Miz a slightly more meaningful game, in which case have him instead of Harper, or move Harper up instead of Chaplin. |  | | |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:32 - Dec 3 with 262 views | clive_baker |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:24 - Dec 3 by Mookamoo |
That seems good to me.
Maybe try and give El Miz a slightly more meaningful game, in which case have him instead of Harper, or move Harper up instead of Chaplin. |
Could be an option, I certainly wouldn't be surprised if he starts tomorrow. Personally I would be tempted to start him with Morsy on Tuesday, it would be a bold call but I really like his energy in the middle.
So Toto, Donacien, Morsy, El Miz, Bonne, Celina all keeping their powder dry for Charlton. | |
| |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:44 - Dec 3 with 248 views | homer_123 |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:00 - Dec 3 by chrismakin |
There's nothing to be called out for.
This OP is solely about what do people think PC will pick as the lineup. .. any response other than to the OP is nothing but a baiting attempt as its a very simple OP with no room for anything other than what do you think he will do.
SB knows what he was doing. He did it before. I'm not entertaining it. If he wishes to contribute to the OP for people to discuss with him that's cool. But I'm not being that guy again who argues for 10 pages. |
"...its a very simple OP with no room for anything other than what do you think he will do."
Honestly chris, I think you misunderstand the point of forums.
Can I ask - if you were in a pub with mates on Saturday before the game and said that Jackson was the best striker at the Club and then, on the following Tuesday night said that Bonne was the best striker at the Club and one your mates pointed out that last Saturday you had Jackson was - that would be wrong to do that?
By the way - I'm not saying it's wrong to change your mind or alter your views or opinions but, equally, it's not wrong for people to question said changes or contradictions. |  |
| |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:48 - Dec 3 with 239 views | chrismakin |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 10:44 - Dec 3 by homer_123 |
"...its a very simple OP with no room for anything other than what do you think he will do."
Honestly chris, I think you misunderstand the point of forums.
Can I ask - if you were in a pub with mates on Saturday before the game and said that Jackson was the best striker at the Club and then, on the following Tuesday night said that Bonne was the best striker at the Club and one your mates pointed out that last Saturday you had Jackson was - that would be wrong to do that?
By the way - I'm not saying it's wrong to change your mind or alter your views or opinions but, equally, it's not wrong for people to question said changes or contradictions. |
I'm completely in agreement with you.
But. This isn't about a change of opinion and neither was his reply. | |
| |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 11:17 - Dec 3 with 202 views | wkj |
| Team for Sat then. What we expecting? on 09:40 - Dec 3 by StokieBlue |
I'm using the forum as intended.
You posted a frankly ridiculously hot take which many didn't agree with (as it usually the way) and I'm simply asking why Cook won't go with it given you spent many posts arguing it was the best option. You are deciding not to answer the question.
As for reporting for abuse - you're the only one here who has called someone a "d1ckhead" and were banned. People in glass houses and all that.
SB [Post edited 3 Dec 2021 9:42]
|
Don't be a dck stokie. If someone can post as freely as they like, you can't go around replying as freely as you like. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
