Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 13:49 - Jan 24 with 1452 viewsSteve_M

FFS.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/24/met-apologises-to-academic-for-s


Poll: When are the squad numbers out?
Blog: Cycle of Hurt

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 14:07 - Jan 24 with 1384 viewsBanksterDebtSlave

Thank goodness this stuff has been consigned to the bad old days..!!
The police will always be the biggest gang in town.

"They break our legs and tell us to be grateful when they offer us crutches."
Poll: Do you wipe after having a piss?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 14:53 - Jan 24 with 1308 viewsbluelagos

Wonder if any of these Met officers have been sacked? And why does it take 9 years for the Met to fess up and apologise?

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 14:54 - Jan 24 with 1305 viewsN2_Blue

Wow.

I used to have time for the police but the kind of stuff that has come out in recent years is shameful. I know you can't blame a few rotten apples but in my view police vetting is wholly inadequate.

Unfortunately societal standards have slipped so low and i dislike the human race more and more. The standards have slipped into every bastion of live and i don't believe its a few rotten apples anymore. The police seem deep in unpleasant individuals. Yes there are many amazing individuals I'm sure but the proportion of scum in their ranks is far too large to be excusable.

(Apologies to any who work or have loved ones in the force - just how i feel these days - I'm quite glad i never pursued this as a career path as i very seriously considered when i was in my 20s.)

Poll: Is it now time to sack Paul Cook?

3
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 14:58 - Jan 24 with 1294 viewsfactual_blue

No UK police force has ever been fit for purpose.

Ever since 1829 their remit has been all but undeliverable.

Ta neige, Acadie, fait des larmes au soleil
Poll: Best at sniping
Blog: [Blog] The Shape We're In

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:00 - Jan 24 with 1290 viewsIllinoisblue

West Midlands and South Yorkshire forces looking on approvingly and getting ready to ask somebody to hold their beer.

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:05 - Jan 24 with 1254 viewsbluelagos

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 14:54 - Jan 24 by N2_Blue

Wow.

I used to have time for the police but the kind of stuff that has come out in recent years is shameful. I know you can't blame a few rotten apples but in my view police vetting is wholly inadequate.

Unfortunately societal standards have slipped so low and i dislike the human race more and more. The standards have slipped into every bastion of live and i don't believe its a few rotten apples anymore. The police seem deep in unpleasant individuals. Yes there are many amazing individuals I'm sure but the proportion of scum in their ranks is far too large to be excusable.

(Apologies to any who work or have loved ones in the force - just how i feel these days - I'm quite glad i never pursued this as a career path as i very seriously considered when i was in my 20s.)


Vetting is one thing, but this is a lot bigger imho. It is the culture within policing that is problem, that they are institutionally corrupt.

Ask yourself why has this taken 9 years to come to an apology? How many Met officers will have viewed that footage and not at that point immediately held up their hands and recognised they got it badly wrong? Highlighted it was wrong and immediately taken the necessary steps to ensure her complaint was addressed at that time?

I would suggest in all likelyhood that would be dozens of officers over the years. Dozens of them content to go along with the Met's denials that anything was wrong when it is crystal clear an innocent woman was treated in the most disgusting manner for nothing other than giving someone a "card" detailing their rights.

That is corruption, that is cultural and it is institutional.

Why you feel the need to apologise to anyone who works within policing I have no idea. If I or a loved one worked with the police, I'd want all examples of misconduct highlighted and acted upon, as this lady has done.

That some police and their friends/family don't like that merely suggests that they too are part of the problem. Those who prefer others to cover up and/or ignore the truth about British policing rather than face the truth are part of the problem, irrespective of how uncomfortable that might be for them personally.
[Post edited 24 Jan 2022 15:13]

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

2
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:13 - Jan 24 with 1217 viewsN2_Blue

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:05 - Jan 24 by bluelagos

Vetting is one thing, but this is a lot bigger imho. It is the culture within policing that is problem, that they are institutionally corrupt.

Ask yourself why has this taken 9 years to come to an apology? How many Met officers will have viewed that footage and not at that point immediately held up their hands and recognised they got it badly wrong? Highlighted it was wrong and immediately taken the necessary steps to ensure her complaint was addressed at that time?

I would suggest in all likelyhood that would be dozens of officers over the years. Dozens of them content to go along with the Met's denials that anything was wrong when it is crystal clear an innocent woman was treated in the most disgusting manner for nothing other than giving someone a "card" detailing their rights.

That is corruption, that is cultural and it is institutional.

Why you feel the need to apologise to anyone who works within policing I have no idea. If I or a loved one worked with the police, I'd want all examples of misconduct highlighted and acted upon, as this lady has done.

That some police and their friends/family don't like that merely suggests that they too are part of the problem. Those who prefer others to cover up and/or ignore the truth about British policing rather than face the truth are part of the problem, irrespective of how uncomfortable that might be for them personally.
[Post edited 24 Jan 2022 15:13]


I just didn't want to tarnish the work and careers of some people who do very difficult and thankless jobs I guess. I mean we do need law and order and someone has to do it... and some will actively challenge this stuff. Things like this come out because some individuals with a moral compass become aware of things and refuse to stay silent or complicit.

But otherwise I agree with everything you say BL

Poll: Is it now time to sack Paul Cook?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:18 - Jan 24 with 1201 viewsbluelagos

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:13 - Jan 24 by N2_Blue

I just didn't want to tarnish the work and careers of some people who do very difficult and thankless jobs I guess. I mean we do need law and order and someone has to do it... and some will actively challenge this stuff. Things like this come out because some individuals with a moral compass become aware of things and refuse to stay silent or complicit.

But otherwise I agree with everything you say BL


I know you are on the right side here. But...

"Things like this come out because some individuals with a moral compass become aware of things and refuse to stay silent or complicit"

But it didn't come out did it? It only came out when the recordings came out which backed the lady's version of events. How many of those officers you think spoke out at the time? Or when she first complained?

And the reason they didn't is because of the culture of policing - to protect each other. In some ways it's understandable - they rely on each other in dangerous situations - but that doesn't make it acceptable.

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

0
Login to get fewer ads

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:23 - Jan 24 with 1182 viewsN2_Blue

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:18 - Jan 24 by bluelagos

I know you are on the right side here. But...

"Things like this come out because some individuals with a moral compass become aware of things and refuse to stay silent or complicit"

But it didn't come out did it? It only came out when the recordings came out which backed the lady's version of events. How many of those officers you think spoke out at the time? Or when she first complained?

And the reason they didn't is because of the culture of policing - to protect each other. In some ways it's understandable - they rely on each other in dangerous situations - but that doesn't make it acceptable.


I agree.

I'm not talking in this particular instance which is why it is shameful considering the dozens of other officers in that force who would have been aware. It's shocking - not just the incident itself.

But there are serving police officers that would bring things up like this if they were aware. I have first count testament to that.

Poll: Is it now time to sack Paul Cook?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:32 - Jan 24 with 1153 viewsGlasgowBlue

Two paragraphs in and already it's stomach churning. These officers must have mothers, wives, girlfriends or daughters?

And even if they don't they should be sufficiently educated to know that they are officers of the law. Not Roy Chubby Brown.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:47 - Jan 24 with 1118 viewsIllinoisblue

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:32 - Jan 24 by GlasgowBlue

Two paragraphs in and already it's stomach churning. These officers must have mothers, wives, girlfriends or daughters?

And even if they don't they should be sufficiently educated to know that they are officers of the law. Not Roy Chubby Brown.


Vile scum who should be disciplined/fired. I still don’t get how it goes from “I’m not giving you my name” to having your clothes cut off with scissors for a strip search. Even allowing for some guardian spin that doesn’t add up.

62 - 78 - 81
Poll: What sport is the most corrupt?

1
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:48 - Jan 24 with 1111 viewsHARRY10

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:23 - Jan 24 by N2_Blue

I agree.

I'm not talking in this particular instance which is why it is shameful considering the dozens of other officers in that force who would have been aware. It's shocking - not just the incident itself.

But there are serving police officers that would bring things up like this if they were aware. I have first count testament to that.


It should be the case that ALL officers "would bring things up like this if they were aware."

The balance is tipped too far in favour of the 'rotten apples'.

It is now a daily occurrence to read of a copper who has sexually assaulted, engaged in sex whilst on duty, shoplifted, attacked someone etc

How the hell are these unsuitables allowed to be recruited, never mind remain in the force ?
0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:59 - Jan 24 with 1053 viewsDanTheMan

WTF?

In 2018 Howard appeared before a disciplinary panel, which cleared him of gross misconduct. He argued the search was necessary to assess any risk Duff might pose to herself, and its chair concluded his actions were those of a responsible officer. The CCTV footage now obtained by Duff of the police station custody area on the day she was searched shows Howard telling officers to show her “resistance is futile” and to search her “by any means necessary”.

“Treat her like a terrorist,” he says. “I don’t care.”


Just incredible. What a bunch of w@nkers.

Poll: FM Parallel Game Week 1 (Fulham) - Available Team

1
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:06 - Jan 24 with 1027 viewsbluelagos

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:59 - Jan 24 by DanTheMan

WTF?

In 2018 Howard appeared before a disciplinary panel, which cleared him of gross misconduct. He argued the search was necessary to assess any risk Duff might pose to herself, and its chair concluded his actions were those of a responsible officer. The CCTV footage now obtained by Duff of the police station custody area on the day she was searched shows Howard telling officers to show her “resistance is futile” and to search her “by any means necessary”.

“Treat her like a terrorist,” he says. “I don’t care.”


Just incredible. What a bunch of w@nkers.


Is almost as it the IOPC are not fit for purpose.

I am only 8 years waiting a response to my complaints about the West Mids and South Yorks police...

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:10 - Jan 24 with 1006 viewsDanTheMan

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:06 - Jan 24 by bluelagos

Is almost as it the IOPC are not fit for purpose.

I am only 8 years waiting a response to my complaints about the West Mids and South Yorks police...


I just don't get it.

Either

A) Nobody thought it would be a good idea to actually check this CCTV before clearing this person
or
B) They did think about it but chose not to.

So outrageously incompetent at best and corrupt at worst.

No wonder you've had so many issues.

Poll: FM Parallel Game Week 1 (Fulham) - Available Team

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:10 - Jan 24 with 1004 viewsEwan_Oozami

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:13 - Jan 24 by N2_Blue

I just didn't want to tarnish the work and careers of some people who do very difficult and thankless jobs I guess. I mean we do need law and order and someone has to do it... and some will actively challenge this stuff. Things like this come out because some individuals with a moral compass become aware of things and refuse to stay silent or complicit.

But otherwise I agree with everything you say BL


I defer to Lenny Bruce on this issue....

[Post edited 24 Jan 2022 16:10]

You are the obsolete SRN4 to my Fairey Rotodyne....
Poll: What else could go on top of the cake apart from icing and a cherry?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:12 - Jan 24 with 997 viewsHARRY10

We are on a downward slide towards having the kind of police service all too familiar to Southern Europeans - never mind other parts of the world.

There the police are feared because folk know they are a law unto themselves.

It is not policing by consent, but policing by intimidation and fear.
0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:24 - Jan 24 with 972 viewsmonytowbray

A few bad apples, etc.

ACAB.

TWTD never forgets…
Poll: How close will a TWTD election poll be next to June results?

0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:30 - Jan 24 with 946 viewsXYZ

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 15:48 - Jan 24 by HARRY10

It should be the case that ALL officers "would bring things up like this if they were aware."

The balance is tipped too far in favour of the 'rotten apples'.

It is now a daily occurrence to read of a copper who has sexually assaulted, engaged in sex whilst on duty, shoplifted, attacked someone etc

How the hell are these unsuitables allowed to be recruited, never mind remain in the force ?


The point about the rotten apples saying is that rotten apples soon turn the whole barrel rotten.
0
The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 18:29 - Jan 24 with 860 viewsPendejo

The Metropolitan police aren't fit for purpose - Part 673 on 16:24 - Jan 24 by monytowbray

A few bad apples, etc.

ACAB.


ACAB is so lazy and disrespectful, speaking as someone for whom a specific sergeant took a disliking to at PR for a few seasons I developed an intense dislike of them.

However from 90s often had to work alongside the police I found a different perspective.
More recently I have regailed this site with youngest offspring's adventures with Met Police Volunteer Cadets and have come to know a few Met officers.

My final thoughts on the matter are;-
A cop shop and it's team reflects the dominant sargeant
Reading thru that, who the feck viewed / listened to the cctv and thought the behaviour acceptable to exonerate the sergeant? Treat others how you wish to be treated, it is that easy.

uberima fides
Poll: Who will Charlie Austin play for next season?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025