Mackems vs Wycombe 10:06 - May 21 with 5762 views | Steve_M | Camden is full of Mackems this morning, I didn’t have the heart to tell them they will probably get sh1thoused by Wycombe today. Think I would rather Sunderland go up, they will definitely be competitive next season but I’m not sure Wycombe will be. Obviously Sunderland messing it up badly would also be quite funny. | |
| | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:14 - May 21 with 3438 views | J2BLUE | I think Sunderland can deal with Wycome. We need Sunderland gone. Especially if Derby are taken over and manage to avoid another points deduction. | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:14 - May 21 with 3439 views | Steve_M | I’ll just leave this here too:
| |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:39 - May 21 with 3305 views | Hipsterectomy | Fair play to them. This is their third season in the play offs in this sht league, with two finals at Wembley. Didn't expect them to take over London this time. Surely they can't mess it up again? | |
| Walter Smith's Barmy Army |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:43 - May 21 with 3292 views | footers | Can't go to Wembley without a Bob Marley lighter and a belly full of Chinese buffet! Hope they do Wycombe anyhow. Not many fans have suffered more than us recently but the Mackems certainly have. | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:50 - May 21 with 3264 views | Chrisd | Sunderland will do it today, 15 unbeaten going into this game. Like Forest in the Championship, you sense they have the momentum going in their favour. Alex Neil has done a great job up there, they were dropping like a stone before he arrived. | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:02 - May 21 with 3211 views | davblue |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:50 - May 21 by Chrisd | Sunderland will do it today, 15 unbeaten going into this game. Like Forest in the Championship, you sense they have the momentum going in their favour. Alex Neil has done a great job up there, they were dropping like a stone before he arrived. |
Sunderland have a few more match winners, but if Wycombe impose their game on them it will be a hard afternoon for Sunderland. | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:03 - May 21 with 3212 views | davblue |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:14 - May 21 by J2BLUE | I think Sunderland can deal with Wycome. We need Sunderland gone. Especially if Derby are taken over and manage to avoid another points deduction. |
If Wycombe can keep Ainsworth they should be in the mix, they’ve improved year on year he’s been there, whatever you don’t agree with their playing style he’s done an outstanding job there. | | | |
[Redacted] on 11:06 - May 21 with 3194 views | victorywilhappen |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:43 - May 21 by footers | Can't go to Wembley without a Bob Marley lighter and a belly full of Chinese buffet! Hope they do Wycombe anyhow. Not many fans have suffered more than us recently but the Mackems certainly have. |
[Redacted] | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:13 - May 21 with 3160 views | Churchman | Good luck to Sunderland. A mate is a mackem and we could do with them out of our way next season. A club of that size shouldn’t be in this pub level division anyway. I actually think they’ll beat Wycombe. It’s a home game for them. They know how to mix it too. The beautiful game it won’t be | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:34 - May 21 with 3068 views | footers |
I'm not entirely unconvinced that there's an ancient Indian burial ground under the turf at PR. Perhaps the new pitch being installed will uncover it and rectify the issue. | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:36 - May 21 with 3061 views | pelles321 | VAR being used this afternoon. May impede some Wycombe tactics. Sunderland to win in stoppage time, standard. | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:52 - May 21 with 2996 views | Illinoisblue | Sunderland taking 44,000. Wycombe have somehow found 23,000 fans. Much more interested in this than last week’s cup final. Mackems should win it but Wycombe are no mugs. | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:59 - May 21 with 2955 views | Lord_Lucan | I'm in a hotel in Hounslow and there are loads having a beer in here - well, there were, they have mostly departed but still a few stragglers. Typical lost northern souls in the big city, they thought they could just jump on a bus. | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 13:18 - May 21 with 2715 views | Lord_Lucan |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 10:14 - May 21 by Steve_M | I’ll just leave this here too:
|
Just seen this. Amazing stuff. I’m welling up! | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 13:23 - May 21 with 2695 views | PioneerBlue | I can easily see why people think Wycombe could do a Wycombe on Sunderland but having watched Sunderland home and away and a few times on tv they are the new Wycombe without the full s housery, they also have a few more tools to win games. They will get it done (I think). | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 13:43 - May 21 with 2622 views | EastTownBlue |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 13:23 - May 21 by PioneerBlue | I can easily see why people think Wycombe could do a Wycombe on Sunderland but having watched Sunderland home and away and a few times on tv they are the new Wycombe without the full s housery, they also have a few more tools to win games. They will get it done (I think). |
At PR at the end of last year, under that little sh!t of a manager Johnson, they were the first team I saw blatantly use a fake keeper injury for a time out. | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 14:30 - May 21 with 2480 views | JimmyJazz | Come on Wycombe, the longer Sunderland are stuck in this league deflects from our pathetic attempts to get out - i.e. not even a play off place in 3 years | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 14:35 - May 21 with 2465 views | RegencyBlue |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 11:52 - May 21 by Illinoisblue | Sunderland taking 44,000. Wycombe have somehow found 23,000 fans. Much more interested in this than last week’s cup final. Mackems should win it but Wycombe are no mugs. |
For many of the Wycombe fans it’s the most nervous they’ve been since they started supporting them - ten days ago! | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:10 - May 21 with 2353 views | Illinoisblue | Lively start so far, ridiculous pace to the game. Can’t help thinking Wycombe should lose based solely on Stockdale’s purple and green shirt. There’s just no need for it. | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:13 - May 21 with 2313 views | Churchman |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:10 - May 21 by Illinoisblue | Lively start so far, ridiculous pace to the game. Can’t help thinking Wycombe should lose based solely on Stockdale’s purple and green shirt. There’s just no need for it. |
Yes, it’s got flex of bile and brown stuff all over it. Not a good look. Sunderland look the stronger of the two. | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:15 - May 21 with 2296 views | EastTownBlue | Stockdale. WTF ? | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:15 - May 21 with 2288 views | Churchman |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:13 - May 21 by Churchman | Yes, it’s got flex of bile and brown stuff all over it. Not a good look. Sunderland look the stronger of the two. |
Looks like Stockdale was trying to get some of the brown stuff off as the ball flew past him there. Not his finest hour | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:17 - May 21 with 2262 views | Illinoisblue |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:15 - May 21 by Churchman | Looks like Stockdale was trying to get some of the brown stuff off as the ball flew past him there. Not his finest hour |
Terrible goalkeeping. And terrible from Wycombe to let the Sunderland player to run from halfway unchallenged | |
| |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:19 - May 21 with 2218 views | Churchman |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:17 - May 21 by Illinoisblue | Terrible goalkeeping. And terrible from Wycombe to let the Sunderland player to run from halfway unchallenged |
Wycombe look lethargic and Sunderland are winning every 50/50 | | | |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:21 - May 21 with 2213 views | JDB23 |
Mackems vs Wycombe on 15:17 - May 21 by Illinoisblue | Terrible goalkeeping. And terrible from Wycombe to let the Sunderland player to run from halfway unchallenged |
Yeah poor defending and goalkeeping. Having said that, if you don’t shoot you don’t score and we definitely need to have more efforts on goal even from lower percentage positions. | | | |
| |