| Jackson uptop tomorrow? 13:35 - Jan 13 with 4722 views | FrimleyBlue |
No idea of the pace of the 2 new signings.. but I did wonder if we might see Jackson uptop to start with to stretch the likes of Wilson.
|  |
| |  |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 14:20 - Jan 13 with 1445 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 14:10 - Jan 13 by StokieBlue |
I'm not convinced we are any better at defending in the air when Burgess is playing. Most of the goals we concede aren't because the CB's have missed them, it's the full backs or wingers not winning the header.
Burgess has done fine but after watching Edmundson again the other match it's clear to me that Burgess is slower to make the decision on what to do with the ball. Still think Burgess will start tomorrow though.
SB |
Burgess is slower but he's improving imo. Edmundson showed again tho that mistakes are still in him. His error played a part in Keoghs stupidity for example.
Again tho we have options. But against league leaders I personally would stick with the defense that is coping OK. We just need the other players to minimise needless freekicks and minimise free crosses. | |
| |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 14:30 - Jan 13 with 1405 views | cressi |
If there is a God No No No |  | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 14:46 - Jan 13 with 1343 views | Stewart27 |
No
We need our number 9 to have a goalscoring threat.
We’ve spent money on number 9s who can score goals. | | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 15:06 - Jan 13 with 1293 views | Fixed_It |
The thing is - this isn't.even your daftest post of the day!! |  |
| |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 16:18 - Jan 13 with 1230 views | ringwoodblue |
Not unless McKenna’s plan is to get Plymouth down to ten men and nick a 1-0. Jacko doesn’t score many and we will need at least two to win tomorrow imho so it’s a No from me. |  |
| |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 17:11 - Jan 13 with 1191 views | SuperKieranMcKenna |
There is no train of thought to suggest Jackson will get picked up front…but you already knew this… | | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 17:15 - Jan 13 with 1184 views | jaykay |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 14:13 - Jan 13 by jaykay |
good to see you back in the fold.hope to see others back soon |
well 2 people have down voted this, i don't even have to look to see who they are. |  |
| forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 17:19 - Jan 13 with 1182 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 17:11 - Jan 13 by SuperKieranMcKenna |
There is no train of thought to suggest Jackson will get picked up front…but you already knew this… |
That's what people said the last time he did. And the time before that. | |
| |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 18:02 - Jan 13 with 1132 views | DinDjarin |
Same starting 11 as Portsmouth at a guess |  | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 18:04 - Jan 13 with 1132 views | DinDjarin |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 13:59 - Jan 13 by Garv |
Hope not.
Walton
JD Wolf Burgess*
Burns Evans Morsy Davis
Chaplin Broadhead
Ladapo
*Wouldn't be at all upset to see Edmundson. Seems crazy that he can't get a game and overall I still rate him over Burgess, but he deserves his place currently. |
Swap Broadhead for Harness and probably bang on | | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 19:10 - Jan 13 with 1099 views | Vaughan8 |
We've just signed 2 forwards and Ladapo is better than him. He'll be lucky to get on the bench! | | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 21:22 - Jan 13 with 1046 views | Ely_Blue |
Have you been on the wacky backy?
Anyone ever tell you less is more, as in post less drivel and you might make more sense! |  |
| |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 23:15 - Jan 13 with 1006 views | BigCommon |
Both Hirst and Broadhead are quick.. Not in the speed category of Jackson, but , still, no slouches .. Hirst surprisingly quick for a big lad. We may see him as a slight alternative to Ladapo. In that, he probably isn't as good with back to goal, as Freddy. But quick enough to be slipped in with ball to feet now and then, as well as a decent threat in the air.... I'm not so sure he is the like for like sub for Ladapo that some people think he is. Some similarities, but will also offer some differences. Which is a good thing, imo.
I think Ladapo will start up top. But we'll see. |  | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 23:52 - Jan 13 with 982 views | buoyant |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 13:36 - Jan 13 by Whataday78 |
que the unnecessary hate.... |
Que? Eh? Que? |  |
| |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 07:10 - Jan 14 with 934 views | PioneerBlue |
I would have thought not on this occasion. | |
| |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 10:54 - Jan 14 with 891 views | WestSussexBlue |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 13:38 - Jan 13 by Illinoisblue |
Given who we’ve just signed that would be quite something. |
Like Mcarthy playing Skuse and Douglas just to p1ss of the fans. | | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 12:18 - Jan 14 with 830 views | DavoIPB |
Jackson instead of burns? | | | |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 12:31 - Jan 14 with 815 views | positivity |
| Jackson uptop tomorrow? on 13:59 - Jan 13 by Garv |
Hope not.
Walton
JD Wolf Burgess*
Burns Evans Morsy Davis
Chaplin Broadhead
Ladapo
*Wouldn't be at all upset to see Edmundson. Seems crazy that he can't get a game and overall I still rate him over Burgess, but he deserves his place currently. |
agree with that team, all being fit.
hirst, harness and jackson to come off the bench, the former 2 have a good understanding from pompey days
subs bench is tough to pick there, if we can bring on 5 subs, i'd like to see 9 on there, going to have to leave out the likes of edmundson, edwards, aluko despite decent performances... [Post edited 14 Jan 2023 12:33]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
