| ITFC attitude to Blue Action 13:13 - Jan 17 with 11474 views | Zx1988 |
It's been interesting to read the comments on recent BA threads, that suggest that there is a real difference between the club's public messaging regarding creating an atmosphere, and the way in which they treat BA's attempts to create said atmosphere.
When I was reading up on the English Ultra scene yesterday, I noted that the Holmesdale Fanatics took 'strike' action against the lack of assistance/cooperation that they received from Crystal Palace.
Is this something that BA might consider if the club, as it seems, continue to refuse to work with them in a constructive manner and, instead, pay lip service to trying to keep them onside? |  |
| |  |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 09:39 - Jan 18 with 1683 views | FrimleyBlue |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 08:06 - Jan 18 by Metal_Hacker |
NO sorry...you were actually moaning about a blocked spectators view by the waving of flags not just strike action |
But that's not a moan aimed at BA. It's an opinion an open one due to the OP being on a public forum which you keep forgetting. Could be BA. Could be a 60 year old who likes to wave a flag.
You don't have to currently go to games to know or share a view that a person has the right to watch the game without any restriction of view. |  |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 10:52 - Jan 18 with 1584 views | Metal_Hacker |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 09:39 - Jan 18 by FrimleyBlue |
But that's not a moan aimed at BA. It's an opinion an open one due to the OP being on a public forum which you keep forgetting. Could be BA. Could be a 60 year old who likes to wave a flag.
You don't have to currently go to games to know or share a view that a person has the right to watch the game without any restriction of view. |
" You don't have to currently go to games to know or share a view that a person has the right to watch the game without any restriction of view. "
No I agree BUT it certainly gives the argument some credence
As for ME " keep forgetting " , I'm very mindful that this is a PUBLIC forum but it seems at times that YOU seem to forget the fact and you carry on as this is a "Frimmers Forum"
I'm usually quite easy going for the most but you really are making this forum ( of late not all the time ) very difficult to visit .I'm all for frank and open discussion but it seems this past while you as an individual revel in being "spikey" and creating some sort of siege mentality
I'm really all for adverse opinions , I realyl am BUT crying out loud , just lay off for a bit |  |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 11:27 - Jan 18 with 1504 views | FrimleyBlue |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 10:52 - Jan 18 by Metal_Hacker |
" You don't have to currently go to games to know or share a view that a person has the right to watch the game without any restriction of view. "
No I agree BUT it certainly gives the argument some credence
As for ME " keep forgetting " , I'm very mindful that this is a PUBLIC forum but it seems at times that YOU seem to forget the fact and you carry on as this is a "Frimmers Forum"
I'm usually quite easy going for the most but you really are making this forum ( of late not all the time ) very difficult to visit .I'm all for frank and open discussion but it seems this past while you as an individual revel in being "spikey" and creating some sort of siege mentality
I'm really all for adverse opinions , I realyl am BUT crying out loud , just lay off for a bit |
You are aware that most of the replies from me are to posters like yourself who dive in to claim what can and can't be posted on. You then bemoan when the thread ends up having further replies from me.
Your first reply has resulted in 6 further posters which to be honest didn't need posting but were because you felt its Your place to say who can post what and when. | |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 11:42 - Jan 18 with 1475 views | Metal_Hacker |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 11:27 - Jan 18 by FrimleyBlue |
You are aware that most of the replies from me are to posters like yourself who dive in to claim what can and can't be posted on. You then bemoan when the thread ends up having further replies from me.
Your first reply has resulted in 6 further posters which to be honest didn't need posting but were because you felt its Your place to say who can post what and when. |
You have serious issues mate. Honestly. Please don’t bother replying
I’ve tried to show patience but ……
Just crack on and I’ll deal with you in my own way | |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 12:51 - Jan 18 with 1405 views | Pinewoodblue |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 11:42 - Jan 18 by Metal_Hacker |
You have serious issues mate. Honestly. Please don’t bother replying
I’ve tried to show patience but ……
Just crack on and I’ll deal with you in my own way |
If you can’t cope with his posts put him on ignore. |  |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 13:00 - Jan 18 with 1372 views | Horsham |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 12:51 - Jan 18 by Pinewoodblue |
If you can’t cope with his posts put him on ignore. |
I think given he’s at the centre of so many conversations that would make the board very hard to read! |  | | |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 13:13 - Jan 18 with 1353 views | Metal_Hacker |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 13:00 - Jan 18 by Horsham |
I think given he’s at the centre of so many conversations that would make the board very hard to read! |
^^^^this ! | |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 13:21 - Jan 18 with 1321 views | PJH |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 13:00 - Jan 18 by Horsham |
I think given he’s at the centre of so many conversations that would make the board very hard to read! |
He made the site unenjoyable for me under the previous name he was using, it is no better now. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 13:31 - Jan 18 with 1263 views | Horsham |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 13:21 - Jan 18 by PJH |
He made the site unenjoyable for me under the previous name he was using, it is no better now. |
Well we’ve not really chatted but I have enjoyed your contributions in the past so it is sad you’re not enjoying being here. I’d sooner hear more of what you have to say and less of what Frimmers has to say to be honest. [Post edited 18 Jan 2023 13:32]
| | | |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 15:05 - Jan 18 with 1189 views | FrimleyBlue |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 11:42 - Jan 18 by Metal_Hacker |
You have serious issues mate. Honestly. Please don’t bother replying
I’ve tried to show patience but ……
Just crack on and I’ll deal with you in my own way |
Is that a threat. | |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 15:18 - Jan 18 with 1142 views | Metal_Hacker |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 15:05 - Jan 18 by FrimleyBlue |
Is that a threat. |
Sorry ...a threat ?
I'm a 55 year old bloke ...get a grip ffs | |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 15:26 - Jan 18 with 1120 views | ITFCWATP |
This thread is hilarious. Never seen such uproar over something that can only be seen as a positive - I was in section 6 on saturday and there was two altercations I see but to pin it on the entire BA is laughable.
IMO - SBR lower is where you stand and be vocal to watch a game. If you want to sit and enjoy the football sit somewhere else. If you dont like flags in front of your eyes, then BA need to work together with EVERYONE and the club to have a full section of participants.
Besides all of this - UP THE F*KING TOWN | | | |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 17:16 - Jan 18 with 1007 views | hoppy |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 15:26 - Jan 18 by ITFCWATP |
This thread is hilarious. Never seen such uproar over something that can only be seen as a positive - I was in section 6 on saturday and there was two altercations I see but to pin it on the entire BA is laughable.
IMO - SBR lower is where you stand and be vocal to watch a game. If you want to sit and enjoy the football sit somewhere else. If you dont like flags in front of your eyes, then BA need to work together with EVERYONE and the club to have a full section of participants.
Besides all of this - UP THE F*KING TOWN |
"...and the club to have a full section of participants"
I think that's likely to happen whenever we next play Norwich. |  |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 17:34 - Jan 18 with 969 views | StokieBlue |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 09:39 - Jan 18 by FrimleyBlue |
But that's not a moan aimed at BA. It's an opinion an open one due to the OP being on a public forum which you keep forgetting. Could be BA. Could be a 60 year old who likes to wave a flag.
You don't have to currently go to games to know or share a view that a person has the right to watch the game without any restriction of view. |
It's not actually a public forum, it's own by Phil and Gav and they determine what is acceptable to post and whom can post based on their T&C.
SB |  | | |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 17:38 - Jan 18 with 954 views | FrimleyBlue |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 17:34 - Jan 18 by StokieBlue |
It's not actually a public forum, it's own by Phil and Gav and they determine what is acceptable to post and whom can post based on their T&C.
SB |
you can view the forum without being logged in, therefore it's open to the public.
You do indeed have to be signed in to comment, and within that observe their T&C's which I do. | |
| |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 19:56 - Jan 18 with 825 views | Pinewoodblue |
| ITFC attitude to Blue Action on 17:38 - Jan 18 by FrimleyBlue |
you can view the forum without being logged in, therefore it's open to the public.
You do indeed have to be signed in to comment, and within that observe their T&C's which I do. |
Forum a place to exchange opinion. You have to log on to post therefore TWTD is not a Public Forum. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
