| Corbyn not standing as a Labour candidate 09:26 - Feb 15 with 20107 views | tractordownsouth |
Big choice for momentum now if he contests the election as an independent. Their MPs are mostly from the newer intakes and they won’t want to give up their jobs to campaign for Corbyn against a Labour candidate, but having alienated the moderate factions they need his base on board. [Post edited 15 Feb 2023 9:28]
|  |
| |  |
| Corbyn not standing as a Labour candidate on 14:14 - Feb 22 with 345 views | Darth_Koont |
| Corbyn not standing as a Labour candidate on 12:55 - Feb 22 by SuperKieranMcKenna |
So Panarama is the latest to hit the DK smear list. To be added to ECHR, BBC, Th Guardian. What about Ofcom? Or the Courts that found in favour of John Ware? All this dismissing credible, impartial institutions (like the Trumpists) is why people give up engaging with you.
Last post on this because I’m sure Phil will shut it down soon. |
Did you read the article? Can you address any, you know, actual points in that and what I’ve written. I’ve explained the significant shortcomings in the media and the failings exhibited by different organisations. In essence, that they don’t deal with the data, the objective facts or the indisputable weaponisation of the issue anything like they should have done.
We can go round in circles with you accusing and me debunking but I’d like to see the evidence you’re using. Or that you even have any evidence that contradicts the Chakrabarti Report, the Forde Inquiry and even the EHRC report that says almost nothing of what the weaponised campaign alleges re: rife antisemitism in the Labour Party and an unwillingness to do anything about it.
I’ve read all of them as well as a hefty chunk of the 900-page Labour Leaks. You seem to have only read a couple of opinion pieces from Guardian centrists and completely swallowed the factional narrative of those who hate the left more than the Tories. Throw in some loony pro-Israel apartheid-apologist fundamentalists and that’s quite a cocktail of nonsense you’re sipping from.
You’re not so much unwilling to engage but unable to engage and discuss objectively without showing yourself up. |  |
| |
| Corbyn not standing as a Labour candidate on 14:25 - Feb 22 with 315 views | Darth_Koont |
| Corbyn not standing as a Labour candidate on 12:53 - Feb 22 by Ryorry |
Corbyn's response to the publication/reproduction of the infamous antisemitic cartoon with its tropes (which I've searched for just now to get the date, but can't find, might have been 2017) - the one of 12 "businessmen" sitting round a table - alone demolishes your argument. Iirc* his persistent comments at the time were that he couldn't see anything antisemitic in it.
Which makes him look either naive, stupid, an apologist, or a combination of those. Take you pick.
*Edit: Have now found a Guardian article (23/03/2018) on the row, which related to comments JC had made on the mural on a facebook page in 2012. He did eventually fully apologise, but again iirc, not before arguing & towing the "can't see anything antisemitic in it" line for quite a while before issuing his apology & condemning the mural. [Post edited 22 Feb 2023 13:56]
|
Dodge everything. Re-hash a completely separate accusation. And also get most of the facts wrong at the same time.
GB would be proud. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
