| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons 23:35 - Aug 15 with 2385 views | Hipsterectomy |
They need to give City ~£11 mill due to a 20% clause, but looking at £45+ million after add ons is crazy money for this league |  |
| Walter Smith's Barmy Army |
| |  |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:37 - Aug 15 with 2351 views | Illinoisblue |
And Ward-Prowse gone for 30m. Good job they have parachute money to tide them over. |  |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:43 - Aug 15 with 2308 views | Hipsterectomy |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:37 - Aug 15 by Illinoisblue |
And Ward-Prowse gone for 30m. Good job they have parachute money to tide them over. |
The inflated market really is making a mockery of the parachute payments. I guess you have Leeds and, to an extent, Norwich this season, who have not really made good money from sales so have more holes to fill, but the wages lost are probably considerable. | |
| Walter Smith's Barmy Army |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:51 - Aug 15 with 2286 views | Illinoisblue |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:43 - Aug 15 by Hipsterectomy |
The inflated market really is making a mockery of the parachute payments. I guess you have Leeds and, to an extent, Norwich this season, who have not really made good money from sales so have more holes to fill, but the wages lost are probably considerable. |
My prediction: rules around reducing or scrapping parachute payments will come into effect just as we get promoted. | |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:52 - Aug 15 with 2269 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:51 - Aug 15 by Illinoisblue |
My prediction: rules around reducing or scrapping parachute payments will come into effect just as we get promoted. |
And then the Sky TV deal will completely collapse. |  |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 00:06 - Aug 16 with 2227 views | Illinoisblue |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:52 - Aug 15 by gainsboroughblue |
And then the Sky TV deal will completely collapse. |
Ha! And ITV Digital rises from the dead to save the day to formally close the banter era. | |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 08:24 - Aug 16 with 1710 views | GeoffSentence |
I wonder if we can interest Chelsea in Edwards or Hayes or any of our other players who may be moving on. |  |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 08:47 - Aug 16 with 1614 views | TractorCam |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:51 - Aug 15 by Illinoisblue |
My prediction: rules around reducing or scrapping parachute payments will come into effect just as we get promoted. |
Wouldn't effect us, we'll be looking at European football rather than relegation. |  |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:00 - Aug 16 with 1559 views | King_of_Portman_Rd |
Saw a stat somewhere (can’t be bothered to go hunting for it) but thought it was quite interesting involving player sales for the 3 relegated clubs.
Leicester has made £79m from 3 sales
Saints £90m+ from 4 sales
Leeds £3m from 8 sales
Either Leeds are keeping their best players or their best players were actually push poor and not worth the money they spent on them. Leicester & Saints though have brought in some serious coin
*figures may not be fully correct |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:13 - Aug 16 with 1510 views | ITFCBlues |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 23:43 - Aug 15 by Hipsterectomy |
The inflated market really is making a mockery of the parachute payments. I guess you have Leeds and, to an extent, Norwich this season, who have not really made good money from sales so have more holes to fill, but the wages lost are probably considerable. |
Norwich have Sara for next year and if he keeps going the way he is, that'll be 25-30m you'd suspect |  |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:15 - Aug 16 with 1502 views | tractordownsouth |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:00 - Aug 16 by King_of_Portman_Rd |
Saw a stat somewhere (can’t be bothered to go hunting for it) but thought it was quite interesting involving player sales for the 3 relegated clubs.
Leicester has made £79m from 3 sales
Saints £90m+ from 4 sales
Leeds £3m from 8 sales
Either Leeds are keeping their best players or their best players were actually push poor and not worth the money they spent on them. Leicester & Saints though have brought in some serious coin
*figures may not be fully correct |
Leeds have taken a very strange approach. Harrison, Aaronson, Kristensen, Koch and Wober have all gone out on loan, so they're losing a lot of key players without getting transfer fees in. |  |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:20 - Aug 16 with 1470 views | itfc48 |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:15 - Aug 16 by tractordownsouth |
Leeds have taken a very strange approach. Harrison, Aaronson, Kristensen, Koch and Wober have all gone out on loan, so they're losing a lot of key players without getting transfer fees in. |
I think their hands have been tied somewhat by relegation release clauses from what I've read. Rodrigo's was £3m which was ridiculous given how much they paid for him. |  | | |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:20 - Aug 16 with 1468 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:15 - Aug 16 by tractordownsouth |
Leeds have taken a very strange approach. Harrison, Aaronson, Kristensen, Koch and Wober have all gone out on loan, so they're losing a lot of key players without getting transfer fees in. |
They expect to ho straight back up don't they.
As for Chelsea £111 mil on Caceido another 60 plus on Lavia, it's non stop.
Just seem to buying players to stop anyone else having them |  |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:27 - Aug 16 with 1431 views | TractorCam |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:20 - Aug 16 by BlueandTruesince82 |
They expect to ho straight back up don't they.
As for Chelsea £111 mil on Caceido another 60 plus on Lavia, it's non stop.
Just seem to buying players to stop anyone else having them |
Indeed, Liverpool wanted both so Klopp is probably tearing up his office. | |
| |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:37 - Aug 16 with 1384 views | yorkshireblue |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:20 - Aug 16 by itfc48 |
I think their hands have been tied somewhat by relegation release clauses from what I've read. Rodrigo's was £3m which was ridiculous given how much they paid for him. |
Yeah, a lot of the players have clauses in their contract allowing them to leave on loan if they were relegated. They also have some players on big wages, which may prevent some of their better players leaving. They should get a few quid for Tyler Adams though.
That being said, colleague was only saying this morning how thin their squad is currently - think he said they have 11 available players (taking into account injuries and three players on strike) with any first team expereince. |  | | |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:38 - Aug 16 with 1375 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Saints selling Lavia to Chelsea for £53 mill before add ons on 09:00 - Aug 16 by King_of_Portman_Rd |
Saw a stat somewhere (can’t be bothered to go hunting for it) but thought it was quite interesting involving player sales for the 3 relegated clubs.
Leicester has made £79m from 3 sales
Saints £90m+ from 4 sales
Leeds £3m from 8 sales
Either Leeds are keeping their best players or their best players were actually push poor and not worth the money they spent on them. Leicester & Saints though have brought in some serious coin
*figures may not be fully correct |
Just waiting on some clubs to sell some players before we can do our business though .... |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
