| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) 14:17 - Jan 29 with 1438 views | carlisleaway |
|  | | |  |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:18 - Jan 29 with 1425 views | Parky |
Really? I think fridge keeps his place and keeps Burgess out of the team, personally. |  | | |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:20 - Jan 29 with 1407 views | Herbivore |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:18 - Jan 29 by Parky |
Really? I think fridge keeps his place and keeps Burgess out of the team, personally. |
Yeah, think that's going to be a very tough call to make. Fridge has been excellent since coming into the side. |  |
| |
| I'm in camp Fridge on 14:22 - Jan 29 with 1367 views | unstableblue |
Would be extremely harsh to drop him |  |
| |
| I'm a camp Fridge on 14:25 - Jan 29 with 1344 views | Bloots |
| I'm in camp Fridge on 14:22 - Jan 29 by unstableblue |
Would be extremely harsh to drop him |
 |  |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:36 - Jan 29 with 1244 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:18 - Jan 29 by Parky |
Really? I think fridge keeps his place and keeps Burgess out of the team, personally. |
I would agree. Not sure how you can drop him unless he has a couple of stinkers over the next few. |  |
| |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:18 - Jan 29 with 1144 views | HighgateBlue |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:20 - Jan 29 by Herbivore |
Yeah, think that's going to be a very tough call to make. Fridge has been excellent since coming into the side. |
The marauding runs are the clincher for me!
But I think Kieran may rotate a bit. It's possible that he only rotated previously to get Fridge up to speed because he knew Cam was going to the Asian Cup, but even so, he is a bit of a 'horses for courses' guy when it comes to team selection, so I think he'll use both of them as appropriate.
But yeah, just to drop Fridge wholesale would be pretty harsh. |  | | |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:23 - Jan 29 with 1106 views | wischip |
All we are saying is give Fridge a chance. |  | | |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:24 - Jan 29 with 1096 views | GlasgowBlue |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:20 - Jan 29 by Herbivore |
Yeah, think that's going to be a very tough call to make. Fridge has been excellent since coming into the side. |
I thought the same. But he was outpaced by Maidstone strikers on Saturday.
Attacking wise Fridge offers more. [Post edited 29 Jan 15:25]
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:28 - Jan 29 with 1054 views | mrfixit426 |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:24 - Jan 29 by GlasgowBlue |
I thought the same. But he was outpaced by Maidstone strikers on Saturday.
Attacking wise Fridge offers more. [Post edited 29 Jan 15:25]
|
We've started to keep clean sheets again since Fridge came back to partner Woolfie. |  | | |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:30 - Jan 29 with 1031 views | Herbivore |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:24 - Jan 29 by GlasgowBlue |
I thought the same. But he was outpaced by Maidstone strikers on Saturday.
Attacking wise Fridge offers more. [Post edited 29 Jan 15:25]
|
Maidstone aside he's been good though. Thought Tuanzebe had a bit of a shocker to be honest and Fridge was covering for him a fair bit. He's looked much more assured alongside Woolf, who for me has emerged lately as comfortably our best CB. I suspect we might see Burgess and Fridge rotating depending on the opponent and whose attributes are best suited. | |
| |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:31 - Jan 29 with 1020 views | TrumptonBlue |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:28 - Jan 29 by mrfixit426 |
We've started to keep clean sheets again since Fridge came back to partner Woolfie. |
Well, one. |  | | |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:33 - Jan 29 with 998 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:30 - Jan 29 by Herbivore |
Maidstone aside he's been good though. Thought Tuanzebe had a bit of a shocker to be honest and Fridge was covering for him a fair bit. He's looked much more assured alongside Woolf, who for me has emerged lately as comfortably our best CB. I suspect we might see Burgess and Fridge rotating depending on the opponent and whose attributes are best suited. |
Yes, I agree. TZ really had a bad game on Saturday. Slowed down the play too much and constantly was in the wrong spot. It was the first time i've watched him and thought that maybe he isn't actually the better option. | |
| |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:33 - Jan 29 with 992 views | mrfixit426 |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:31 - Jan 29 by TrumptonBlue |
Well, one. |
That's a start!
 | | | |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:39 - Jan 29 with 949 views | Herbivore |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:33 - Jan 29 by JammyDodgerrr |
Yes, I agree. TZ really had a bad game on Saturday. Slowed down the play too much and constantly was in the wrong spot. It was the first time i've watched him and thought that maybe he isn't actually the better option. |
Sounds like you were lucky enough to not watch the Leeds game in that case. | |
| |
| POST OF THE DAY (n/t) on 16:00 - Jan 29 with 847 views | unstableblue |
| I'm a camp Fridge on 14:25 - Jan 29 by Bloots |
|
| |
| |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 16:00 - Jan 29 with 845 views | norfsufblue |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 14:18 - Jan 29 by Parky |
Really? I think fridge keeps his place and keeps Burgess out of the team, personally. |
Fridge has actually been playing more than Burgess at the Asian cup so he might need getting back up to our requirements before who's best can even be contemplated? |  | | |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 17:47 - Jan 29 with 639 views | ReusersTown |
| All we want is Burgess back (n/t) on 15:24 - Jan 29 by GlasgowBlue |
I thought the same. But he was outpaced by Maidstone strikers on Saturday.
Attacking wise Fridge offers more. [Post edited 29 Jan 15:25]
|
Outpaced, really? He had about 15 yards to catch up on both if you're talking about the goals. Also interesting that you think Burgess would be the answer to a lack of pace, mobility is not one of his many strengths. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
